Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Here are the limitations of virtual doctor visits

Joseph Kvedar, MD
Tech
May 21, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

Virtual visits are increasingly the rage amongst forward-thinking healthcare providers that want to jump on the telehealth band wagon.  Extending the office visit across distance, using the same technology we use to keep in touch with loved ones (videoconferencing such as Skype and FaceTime), is a safe and logical way for providers to venture into a new tech-enabled world that may still be scary for some.

One way to think of this trend is to consider virtual visits an extension of the brick and mortar care model made famous a decade ago by companies like MinuteClinic.  Offer convenient access to a care provider for a limited number of conditions.

Virtual visits can take place by either video or voice connection.  These interactions are most often for indications that are non-life threatening, acute problems such as a sore throat, earache, urinary tract infection and the like.  There is also a role for this technology in follow-up care for conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, but for this post, we’ll focus on acute care.

Employers and health plans are interested in this mode of care delivery too.  In a relatively short period of time, virtual visits have gone from a curiosity to a “table stakes” offering in the world of employee health.  Several companies now offer services in the space, most notably Teladoc (now publically traded) and American Well.  These companies are interesting in that they can offer a complete service (i.e., software platform for access and a network of physicians who are waiting by the (video)phone for your call) or pieces of the service (for instance, just the software platform).  This has led to some confusion in the marketplace.  A consumer can now get a virtual visit from Walgreens or CVS (using the complete approach noted above).  Blue Cross of MA offers its fully insured members access to virtual visits through American Well’s software and network.

You can see why provider organizations would sit up and take notice, with concerns about loss of revenue in the very important segment of primary care, as well as fragmented care. Hence, providers are looking very carefully at how they can offer these services themselves, before they are disrupted by the likes of CVS, Walgreens, and their local health plan.

With this backdrop, I read two interesting journal articles this month.  The first, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, employed individuals trained to act as patients with the following acute illnesses:  ankle pain, strep throat, common cold, low back pain and urinary tract infection.  These were chosen because there are recognized quality measures (which go by the acronym HEDIS) for how they are to be handled in an outpatient setting.

These fake patients performed 599 virtual visits across a number of different vendor scenarios.  The findings revealed that quality of care delivered by this method is variable.  For instance, the correct diagnosis was arrived at in 458/599 visits.  Rates of guideline-adherent care ranged from 206 visits to 396 across eight different vendors.  The big challenge with this — and something we have trouble talking about — is lack of comparison to the face-to-face office visit.  For example, in traditional office-based circumstances, doctors misdiagnose and sometimes do not follow established guidelines.

The second paper was published in the Journal of Telemedicine and eHealth.  The authors specifically targeted virtual visits from Teladoc, and they did the comparison with office visits.  The approach was different, however, in that it involved a retrospective insurance claims analysis from a specific organization, the California Public Employees Retirement System.

The first interesting data point is that of 233,000 eligible individuals, 3,000 took advantage of virtual visits, accounting for just over 4,600 visits.  Utilization of just 1.3 percent is worth noting for those of us preparing to offer these services in the near future.  We probably don’t need to anticipate an avalanche of demand.

The punch line from this study: Teladoc doctors performed worse on a number of indicators than office-based practitioners.  Specifically, they did not order strep tests as much as office providers, and they ordered antibiotics for bronchitis more often.  This makes some intuitive sense, as it is additional work and bother for the virtual doctor to insist the patient get a strep test. (The patient will also be thinking, “Why did I bother to do this virtually and why do they offer this service if I have to travel for a strep test?”)  In the case of antibiotics, the virtual provider may be more cautious without the person in the same room and err on the side of treating with antibiotics.

Both of these papers highlight how early we still are in the widespread adoption of virtual visits.  Though there is lots of pressure to move, and we should do so, we have some time to get it right.  We can take comfort in the low utilization, and work on educating providers on the pitfalls of the virtual environment.  We can also educate our patients up front that even though their entry into the healthcare system will be virtual, they may need to travel to get additional diagnostic services, etc.

It seems that anytime a new tool or technology is introduced, we inevitably apply it broadly, learning as we go that the tool has ideal applications.  Think about how we reflexively use text messaging, email, voice calls and in-person meetings in the context of our work lives.  With time and a thoughtful approach, we’ll get there with virtual visits as well.

Of course, there will come a time when that strep test can be done in-home, at the time of the virtual visit (or even before).  We’ll have better tools for determining which cases of bronchitis should be treated with antibiotics.  Who knows, we might even be able to do some sort of portable imaging for your low back pain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Until then, we’ll be well served to educate both providers and consumers regarding both the excitement and the limitations of virtual visits.

Joseph Kvedar is director, Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare. He blogs at the cHealth Blog and is the author of the Internet of Healthy Things.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com 

Prev

MKSAP: 58-year-old man asks for advice on cardiac risk assessment

May 21, 2016 Kevin 0
…
Next

Drug addiction is a problem that requires treatment, not punishment

May 21, 2016 Kevin 6
…

Tagged as: Mobile health

Post navigation

< Previous Post
MKSAP: 58-year-old man asks for advice on cardiac risk assessment
Next Post >
Drug addiction is a problem that requires treatment, not punishment

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Joseph Kvedar, MD

  • Digital tools should not adversely affect the doctor-patient relationship

    Joseph Kvedar, MD
  • Sharing your personal health data? Don’t be scared!

    Joseph Kvedar, MD
  • 5 obstacles to texting patients

    Joseph Kvedar, MD

Related Posts

  • PCPs could counter virtual plans by increasing telehealth visits

    Ken Terry
  • Osler and the doctor-patient relationship

    Leonard Wang
  • Best practices in virtual residency interviewing

    Madhumitha Rajagopal and Jaclyn Yamada
  • The alarming possibility of virtual medical school

    Marc Braunstein, MD, PhD
  • Finding a new doctor is like dating

    R. Lynn Barnett
  • Doctor, how are you, really?

    Deborah Courtney

More in Tech

  • Why Grok 4 could be the next leap for HIPAA-compliant clinical AI

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • AI is already replacing doctors—just not how you think

    Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA
  • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

    Shanice Spence-Miller, MD
  • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

    Vineet Vishwanath
  • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

    Max Rollwage, PhD
  • 3 tips for using AI medical scribes to save time charting

    Erica Dorn, FNP
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why the heart of medicine is more than science

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • How Ukrainian doctors kept diabetes care alive during the war

      Dr. Daryna Bahriy | Physician
    • Why Grok 4 could be the next leap for HIPAA-compliant clinical AI

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How women physicians can go from burnout to thriving

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

      William J. Bannon IV | Conditions
    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 8 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why the heart of medicine is more than science

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • How Ukrainian doctors kept diabetes care alive during the war

      Dr. Daryna Bahriy | Physician
    • Why Grok 4 could be the next leap for HIPAA-compliant clinical AI

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How women physicians can go from burnout to thriving

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

      William J. Bannon IV | Conditions
    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Here are the limitations of virtual doctor visits
8 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...