Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Cancer care costs everyone too much. What can we do about it?

Andrew Hertler, MD
Policy
June 24, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

Today’s fee-for-service oncology business model misaligns incentives by rewarding practices for keeping margins and service volumes high — even when it’s wasteful — rather than for optimizing patient outcomes.

While discussions of drug pricing dominate the cost control conversation, we, as practitioners, have been abdicating responsibility and missing the opportunity to address cancer’s financial toxicity. We can do better. The practice-level assumption of financial risk for patient care — or the linkage of payment to defined clinical pathways and outcomes — can improve our patients’ outcomes while decreasing waste and cost.

3 misalignments driving up costs

When the patient isn’t paying for some or all of the service, and the physician knows this and this knowledge influences treatment approaches, we perpetuate the “double jeopardy” that has helped drive U.S. health expenditures to $3.5 trillion as of 2017. Cancer care represents 12 percent of all costs to the Medicare population, with costs rising 8 to 10 percent annually.

Medical oncology reimbursement is particularly misaligned in three (fixable!) ways:

1. Waste is rewarded. Oncology practices rely on drug cost spreads for 30 percent of their revenues. Perversely, more expensive drugs provide greater profitability. A patient who may benefit equally from Drug A over Drug B may receive Drug A because it costs more since the practice earns more for prescribing it.

2. Valuable care is uncompensated. Oncology practices provide significant value through care they can’t bill for, including oncologists’ phone calls with patients and staff-delivered services like dietary management, financial counseling, social work services, nurse triage, and education. Collaboration and holistic approaches are shortchanged.

3. Red tape can discourage care innovation. By dictating “how” care is delivered, heavily regulated documentation requirements and quality reporting measures can discourage innovation. The end goal for all parties is a high-quality outcome and having less of a microscope on how care is delivered could encourage new processes that improve patient health.

Redefining cancer care pathways can improve costs and outcomes

Despite the grim situation, three areas present substantial opportunities for savings. If each is incorporated into defined “value-based clinical care pathways,” where adherence to the pathway results in financial bonuses to physicians and practices, we can eliminate some of the backward incentives driving up care costs and instead incentivize better care outcomes.

The first of these is emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) utilization. As many as 56 percent of Medicare patients receiving chemotherapy visit the ED each year; 63 percent of these visits result in hospitalization. An estimated 50 percent of these ED visits could have been avoided with improved outpatient oncology care, according to The Advisory Board and the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Implementing open-access urgent care visits in oncology clinics, standardized nurse triage pathways and extended clinic hours have been shown to decrease ED visits, thereby decreasing IP admissions. In my own clinic, introducing open access clinic visits where a patient could see an oncology physician assistant decreased inpatient admissions by 40 percent.

A second opportunity lies in better palliative care. The early introduction of palliative care in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (in addition to chemotherapy) was shown to lead to improved quality of life, less aggressive end-of-life care, and higher median survival. Instituting outpatient palliative care services has also been estimated to provide savings of $6,000 to $11,500 per patient.

A third savings opportunity lies in improving chemotherapy utilization, which in a Medicare population makes up over half the total cost of care. In most situations, oncologists have multiple chemotherapy choices that offer similar efficacy and toxicity but differ in cost.

ADVERTISEMENT

Standardizing these choices via clinical pathways (guiding oncologists to the highest-value option and avoiding therapies with minimal clinical benefit) allowed my current company to consistently save 10 percent or more in chemotherapy costs.

Making responsibility for cancer costs attractive to oncology providers

Oncologists are embracing evidence-based medicine and an emphasis on high-quality care, as indicated by the uptake of clinical pathways and participation in ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

However, given the high cost of anti-cancer medications and the potential for catastrophic cases, practices with a relatively small number of patients (e.g., 500 to 1,000) may jeopardize their viability by assuming financial responsibility for their patients.

There are financial protections for taking on this capitated risk. For example, reinsurance or risk corridors, “pooling” risk, and/or engaging risk-sharing partners can help practices limit financial exposure.

It’s been hypothesized that one contributing factor to managed care’s failure with capitated providers in the 1990s was patient perception of undertreatment. To address this issue, it will be essential to link oncologists’ assumption of financial risk with transparent quality measure reporting, the result of which impacts the capitation rates Medicare and other payers set. Treating patients on clinical pathways designed transparently to provide the highest efficacy and least toxicity can offer patients assurance.

Additionally, measurable outcomes must be publicly reportable. Many of these are readily available in oncology — including survival, ability to return to work, ED/inpatient use and chemotherapy administration at the end of life — when it’s more likely to be detrimental rather than beneficial to the patient.

Clearly, the status quo of rapidly escalating cancer care costs for patients isn’t acceptable and if unchecked will ultimately limit their access to care. For some, it’s already swapping a cancer death sentence for a financial life sentence. The rising costs associated with rapid (and amazing) clinical innovation are also unsustainable: no practice can remain financially stable when “buy-and-bill” chemotherapy forces them to front millions in treatment costs and then hope to be reimbursed. By adopting more responsibility for the financial cost of cancer care through linking payments to clinical pathways that incentivize value, oncology practices can take costs into their own hands by rewarding outcomes rather than expenses.

Andrew Hertler is an oncologist and chief medical officer, New Century Health.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Physicians have been reduced to overpaid dairy farm labor

June 24, 2019 Kevin 12
…
Next

If you’re chronically ill, setting limitations can make your symptoms manageable

June 24, 2019 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physicians have been reduced to overpaid dairy farm labor
Next Post >
If you’re chronically ill, setting limitations can make your symptoms manageable

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • How inflation fueled health care costs

    Ricardo Chujutalli, MD, MBA and Jessica Yoong
  • 3 reasons why health care costs are rising

    Samuel Falkson
  • America leads the world in high tech care and health care costs

    Mark Kelley, MD
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD
  • Despite progress in cancer care, cost and equity challenges still must be addressed

    David M. Aboulafia, MD
  • A letter to a cancer patient in palliative care

    Alison Vasa

More in Policy

  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden chains holding doctors back

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • From hospital bed to harsh truths: a writer’s unexpected journey

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden chains holding doctors back

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • From hospital bed to harsh truths: a writer’s unexpected journey

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...