Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Consumers are losing the war against meat antibiotics

Martha Rosenberg
Conditions
July 27, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

Antibiotics serve two purposes for large-scale meat farmers. They allow them to raise animals in unsanitary, confined conditions that would otherwise kill or sicken them and they allow factory farmers to use less feed. How much less feed? Without antibiotics, 175,550 more tons of feed would be needed to grow U.S turkeys, lamented Michael Rybolt of the National Turkey Federation at 2008 hearings when the FDA tried to limit farm use.

It is thought that antibiotics increase weight in livestock by strengthening microbes that absorb nutrients, making food more “efficient.” (The same action of antibiotics may explain the human obesity epidemic postulate researchers.)

But the biggest harm of the animal antibiotic orgy on the farm is not human obesity. It is that it creates antibiotic-resistant microbes including E. Coli, salmonella, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), C. difficile and others. Each year in the United States, at least two-million people become infected with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics, and at least 23,000 people die each year as a direct result of these infections says the CDC.

One of the reasons pharma has not dedicated itself to developing new antibiotics to address the antibiotic-resistant microbes afflicting humans is there’s no money in them. Unlike the statins and psychoactive drugs which have made pharma arguably the most profitable industry in the world, antibiotics are only taken for a few days by humans.

But of course, feeding them by the ton to farm animals which enriches large-scale meat farmers and pharma is a different story. And, despite the efforts of public health agencies, hospitals, doctors and lawmakers to stop feeding healthy animals antibiotics at the expense of human health pharma is still brazenly pushing the practice. It is an issue that often pits doctors against veterinarians.

A recent New York Times article details how animal pharma giant Elanco has launched a shocking new campaign called “Pig Zero” that tells farmers to treat pigs with antibiotics when they are healthy and before a disease outbreak occurs. This is the exact opposite of what the CDC, doctors, and public health officials urge.

U.S. industrial farmers turn nasty when the government tries to take away their antibiotics. In 2008, the egg, chicken, turkey, dairy, pork, and cattle industries stormed Capitol Hill over the FDA’s attempt to prohibit the use of antibiotics called cephalosporins, and they won. Antibiotics are downright “green,” said the National Turkey Federation’s Rybolt at the hearings since less land is needed for crops.

After a decade-long battle with Bayer whose fluoroquinolone Baytril (enrofloxacin) was routinely used in poultry, the government managed to ban the antibiotic’s use in poultry water. But, and it is a big “but,” fluoroquinolones — including Baytril — are still clearly in use on U.S. farms, behind the public’s back. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Residue Program for Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products which tests for six fluoroquinolones found enrofloxacin (Baytril) and ciprofloxacin (Cipro) residues in meat in 2014.

Also found by the USDA were residues of danofloxacin, an antibiotic not even approved for humans. Danofloxacin is so dangerous its label says, “Animals intended for human consumption must not be slaughtered within four days from the last treatment. Do not use in cattle intended for dairy production. A withdrawal period has not been established for this product in preruminating calves. Do not use in calves to be processed for veal.”

Though a 2013 FDA guidance required Pharma companies that make livestock antibiotics remove “growth production” from the label, the drugs are still routinely used for the new indication of “disease prevention” Senior Staff Scientist at Consumers Union Dr. Michael Hansen told me soon after the new guidance.

One example of the persisting uses is seen in feedlots, said Dr. Hansen. Feeding cattle grain instead of a more natural diet produces a high level of liver abscesses, he said, and feedlot operators routinely give them the antibiotic Tylosin for the abscesses thus “preventing disease.” Tylosin reduces abscess incidence by 40 to 70 percent in such cattle according to medical journals.

The late Congresswoman Louise M. Slaughter, a microbiologist with a master’s degree in public health, said the 2013 guidance was “an inadequate response to the growing antibiotic-resistant crisis caused by overuse of antibiotics on the farm.”

A Reuters investigation in 2014, after the 2013 guidance confirmed her suspicions. The investigation determined that Tyson Foods, Pilgrim’s Pride, Perdue Farms, George’s and Koch Foods were using antibiotics “more pervasively than regulators realize.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Pilgrim’s Pride’s feed mill records show the antibiotics bacitracin and monensin are added “to every ration fed to a flock grown early this year.” (Pilgrim’s Pride threatened legal action against Reuters for its finding.) Also caught red-handed using antibiotics despite denying their use on its website, KFC-supplier Koch Foods’ chief financial officer Mark Kaminsky, said, “I regret the wording.”

Both the late U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy and Rep. Slaughter fought valiantly to curtail farm antibiotics, but they had formidable enemies. Pharma and factory farmers spent over $17 million to block the bill they were supporting, the Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2007 said Rep. Slaughter. “It seems scarcely believable that these precious medications could be fed by the ton to chickens and pigs,” wrote Kennedy in the bill, noting that up to 70 percent of all U.S. antibiotics go to livestock.

Nor do the meat antibiotics remain in the meat. Scientists at the University of Minnesota found antibiotic residues in corn, green onions and cabbage after growing them on soil fertilized with livestock manure. The drugs siphoned right up from the soil in just six weeks.

A University of Iowa study in 2010 found the resistant bacteria MRSA in 70 percent of hogs on farms studied and 64 percent of workers. Superbugs have even been found on an unopened soft drink can in a car following a poultry truck.

With pro-public health voices like Sen. Kennedy and Rep. Slaughter gone and a pro-industry administration in charge in the United States, it looks like consumers are losing the war against antibiotics war on the farm.

Martha Rosenberg is a health reporter and the author of Born With a Junk Food Deficiency.  

Image credit: Shutterstock.com 

Prev

Think you have health insurance? Think again.

July 27, 2019 Kevin 1
…
Next

The re-education of a physician into the school of pain

July 27, 2019 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Infectious Disease, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Think you have health insurance? Think again.
Next Post >
The re-education of a physician into the school of pain

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Martha Rosenberg

  • How drugmakers manipulate your health from diagnosis to prescription

    Martha Rosenberg
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • How drug companies turned “depression” into a billion-dollar industry

    Martha Rosenberg

Related Posts

  • Why developing new antibiotics is a losing battle

    Christopher Johnson, MD
  • The war on drugs: America’s secret racist war today

    Jay Wong
  • Why you should think twice about prescribing antibiotics

    Rich Rodriguez, MD
  • Should only infectious disease specialists be allowed to prescribe antibiotics?

    Craig Bowron, MD
  • How special interests won big and consumers lost big

    Robert Laszewski
  • Inappropriate antibiotics are the new drugs of abuse

    Rosemary Eseh-Logue, MD

More in Conditions

  • Extreme weight cutting harms health and resilience in youth wrestling

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Institutional reporting systems discourage clinical honesty

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • How doctors can turn criticism into collaboration

    Mary Remón, LCPC
  • Nurse-initiated protocols for sepsis: a strategic imperative for patient care and hospital operations

    Rhonda Collins, DNP, RN
  • How molecular discoveries are transforming preeclampsia prediction and care

    Thomas McElrath, MD, PhD and Kara Rood, MD
  • How neuroplasticity offers hope for complex PTSD

    Hannah Holmes
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Why rigorous training is vital for today’s surgeons

      Philip Alford, MD | Physician
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why hospital jobs are failing physicians: burnout, pay, and lost autonomy

      Justin Nabity, CFP | Finance
    • The cost of ending shadowing in medical education

      Matthew Ryan, MD, PhD | Education
    • Why enterprise risk management is key to value-based health care success

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Extreme weight cutting harms health and resilience in youth wrestling

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • The case for a standard pre-med major in U.S. universities

      Devin Behjatnia | Education
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why patients and doctors are fleeing flagship hospitals

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The hidden reason your vacations never feel like enough

      Kent DeLay, MD | Physician
    • Confronting the return of measles and vaccine misinformation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Why rigorous training is vital for today’s surgeons

      Philip Alford, MD | Physician
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why hospital jobs are failing physicians: burnout, pay, and lost autonomy

      Justin Nabity, CFP | Finance
    • The cost of ending shadowing in medical education

      Matthew Ryan, MD, PhD | Education
    • Why enterprise risk management is key to value-based health care success

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Extreme weight cutting harms health and resilience in youth wrestling

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • The case for a standard pre-med major in U.S. universities

      Devin Behjatnia | Education
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why patients and doctors are fleeing flagship hospitals

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The hidden reason your vacations never feel like enough

      Kent DeLay, MD | Physician
    • Confronting the return of measles and vaccine misinformation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...