Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why are COVID antibody tests of questionable relevance being marketed to the public?

Michelle Finkel, MD
Physician
August 15, 2020
Share
Tweet
Share

It started mid-March with the sensation that I had cut one of my knuckles. Within two weeks, several fingers were swollen like sausages, and my fingertips had developed painful, burning spots. Soon thereafter, my husband noted one red, swollen toe. We are both emergency physicians, but we could not understand what was causing the symptoms, and it was not until a month later that we started to see COVID fingers and toes creeping into the news. The burning sensation continued, and I was referred for a broad panel of labs, all of which came back normal, including – curiously – my COVID antibody test. I communicated with my primary care doctor, a dermatologist, and an infectious disease specialist, all of whom concluded I had “COVID fingers.” If I had had the virus in March, why was my antibody test negative?

Ideally, after exposure to a foreign substance – like a virus – our antibodies provide protection against future exposures to that same biologic material. Recently, though, studies have begun to show that the predictability of commercial testing for COVID antibodies may be weaker than previously thought. One problem might be that some patients have antibodies present but at levels lower than commercial laboratories’ thresholds for detection. An alternative might be a true absence of the antibodies: A Chinese study in Nature Medicine reported that 40% of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients were seronegative for IgG – the most common antibody found in our blood – during the early convalescent phase of the disease. (The antibody levels dropped further as time went on.) There are also questions about whether commercial laboratories are targeting the most relevant antibodies in favor of detecting easier targets that are less clinically useful.

It is also possible that COVID antibodies are less important than we think in providing immunity to the virus: One study found that cellular immunity – the protection we get from T cells – may play a big role in COVID recovery. Recently Dr. Fauci indicated that, for COVID, T cell immunity might have a degree of memory that goes beyond the presence of antibodies.

In addition to whether negative antibody testing truly demonstrates that someone has been spared from COVID, commercial antibody testing has been criticized for the converse: A positive test may reflect immunity to other related coronaviruses responsible for the common cold, for example, instead of the novel coronavirus that causes COVID. In our collective fervor to develop COVID antibody tests, we have had to accept ones that cannot distinguish between mild nuisance viruses and their potentially lethal cousin.

With these facts and my personal story in mind, I was troubled to receive an email earlier this month from the multibillion-dollar commercial laboratory Quest Diagnostics with the subject heading, “3 reasons to get an antibody test – NOW.” In an email blast to patients, Quest recommended that individuals consider getting antibody testing to “Give you and your doctor more information to help make your decision about getting back to everyday activity.”

Considering all of the unknowns with the COVID antibody test, it would seem irresponsible for a commercial laboratory to imply a positive test might allow someone to consider a resumption of a normal routine. The message contradicts the Center for Disease Control’s recommendations that those who have a positive antibody test continue to protect themselves and others. Even if someone has definitively had a COVID infection, the likelihood of reinfection is low, but we do not know for certain yet that it is zero.

Adding insult to injury, although Quest says the antibody test will give “you and your doctor more information,” Quest allows patients to order the test for themselves. Shifting the ordering of laboratory tests from providers to patients – and making money in the process – is a slippery slope of transferring health services out of what should be a professional realm into a transparently profit-oriented one. In case you are wondering, the cost of the Quest COVID antibody test is $119 out of pocket.

Opportunism and exploitation are known flaws of our business-oriented, entrepreneurship-friendly economic system. Directly marketing an expensive test of dubious value to consumers, excluding physicians and scientists who might otherwise explain the lack of utility of such a test, and insinuating that the results would permit a return to life as normal are unprofessional claims in a time of needed clarity and scruples.

In the midst of a public health crisis, it is disappointing that the laboratories we depend on as allies for diagnostic answers have executed a mass marketing initiative that is so misguided.

Michelle Finkel is an emergency physician and founder, Insider Medical Admissions.  She can be reached on Facebook, YouTube, and on Twitter @Insidermedical.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

A medical trainee's experience with mental health

August 15, 2020 Kevin 1
…
Next

4 ways to decrease your dread of being on-call

August 15, 2020 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A medical trainee's experience with mental health
Next Post >
4 ways to decrease your dread of being on-call

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Michelle Finkel, MD

  • We got the new COVID vaccine. It was a whopping $191 per shot.

    Michelle Finkel, MD
  • Made mistakes? How to spin them for your medical school applications.

    Michelle Finkel, MD
  • Why physicians should have golden parachutes

    Michelle Finkel, MD

Related Posts

  • COVID-19 misinformation is a public health crisis

    Jacob Uskavitch
  • A proposed public health response to facilitate continued adherence to COVID-19 restrictions

    Vismaya S. Bachu and Sajya M. Singh
  • COVID-19: Here’s how to gain the public’s trust

    Cullen M. Lilley
  • Finding happiness in the time of COVID

    Anonymous
  • Birthing in the era of COVID

    Jennifer Roelands, MD
  • How to get patients vaccinated against COVID-19 [PODCAST]

    The Podcast by KevinMD

More in Physician

  • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why working in Hawai’i health care isn’t all paradise

    Clayton Foster, MD
  • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Why compassion—not credentials—defines great doctors

    Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib
  • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • A world without vaccines: What history teaches us about public health

      Drew Remignanti, MD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How the 10th Apple Effect is stealing your joy in medicine

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From stigma to science: Rethinking the U.S. drug scheduling system

      Artin Asadipooya | Meds
    • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

      Max Rollwage, PhD | Tech
    • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

      Allen Fredrickson | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • A world without vaccines: What history teaches us about public health

      Drew Remignanti, MD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How the 10th Apple Effect is stealing your joy in medicine

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From stigma to science: Rethinking the U.S. drug scheduling system

      Artin Asadipooya | Meds
    • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

      Max Rollwage, PhD | Tech
    • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

      Allen Fredrickson | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...