Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Asylum seekers: a snapshot from an American physician’s lens

Madeline Cohen and Gauri G. Agarwal, MD
Policy
August 26, 2021
Share
Tweet
Share

Despite the bright pink walls of its exterior, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility stands inconspicuously, set back along a stretch of a frequently traveled road. We had come to meet Carla (identifying information changed), a detainee seeking asylum whose lawyer had requested a medical evaluation from our medical student-run human rights clinic. The immigration officer peered closely at our letter granting entrance and balked at the medical equipment and cell phone we needed to conduct our exam and document any injuries. An hour after a call to the Department of Homeland Security, we finally brought in our equipment and passed through the metal detectors. Our cell phone, typically used to document injury, was confiscated, and we were told that it would be provided when needed.

Asylum seekers are noncitizens who have come to or crossed U.S. borders and are applying for protection from persecution. The Refugee Act of 1980 requires that the United States provide protection to those who qualify as resettled refugees or asylum seekers. There are two paths to apply for asylum: affirmative and defensive. Asylum seekers who enter lawfully (e.g., with a tourist visa) or are under the age of 18, file affirmative applications with the asylum office of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Their asylum claims are adjudicated by an asylum officer in an interview setting. Noncitizens in deportation proceedings file a defensive application with an immigration judge at the Executive Office for Immigration Review within the Department of Justice. This is an adversarial process that resembles a trial, with evidence, examination, and oral testimony. There is no appointed counsel and the asylum seeker (with or without the assistance of an attorney) must present a case of a credible fear of future persecution on account of “race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion” should they be removed from the U.S. and returned to their home country. If they are granted asylum, they are eligible to become permanent residents.

Inside the facility, we saw young men and women with orange and gray prison-style jumpsuits and unlaced shoes. Several attorneys and a judge were on-site, holding asylum court. Carla was brought into a room with a large window and faced our team: a medical student, an attending physician, and an interpreter, all assembled through our student-run human rights clinic. She gave us a nervous smile as we introduced ourselves and explained our roles as impartial medical evaluators for her asylum application.

We asked about her childhood, her home, her siblings, her education, and her aspirations in her native country. We heard stories full of love, support, and comfort. In time, she met a man and became a mother. The story changed to one of control, confinement, and verbal and physical abuse. She feared for her life, and her children’s safety, enduring years of emotional trauma, physical violence, and repeated hospitalizations. When the police were called after episodes of abuse, they were of no help. They photographed broken glass and furniture, but not her physical injuries, claiming that the damaged property was what was “of value.” The culminating event that led Carla to flee to the United States was the night in which she endured rape and the attempted murder of her and her children. She was intercepted off the Florida coast and had been in this ICE facility for several months. She had mostly kept to herself as she awaited her trial. Every screening tool we administered indicated severe depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, clearly linked to uncertainty about her fate, the fate of her children, and a fear of being returned to a land that promised no justice or safety for her. Our interpreter, herself a survivor of intimate partner violence, rested her hand on Carla’s back as she sobbed. In the spartan setting of the Detainment Center, our examination was limited to assessing vital signs, documenting her injuries, and noting the diaphoresis that erupted when she spoke of her husband. After hearing her story and documenting her symptoms, we completed the evaluation and wished her the best.

Carla is one of approximately 120,000 men and women who have applied for asylum in the United States, each of whom carries the burden of proving, and thereby reliving, in a court of law the persecution or abuse they are escaping. Evidence is often scarce, especially when fleeing under duress. In Carla’s case, her husband had taken her phone and deleted items on social media that contained proof of threatening messages. Her body was her last piece of evidence and we carefully documented the cuts and scars that marked it.

As our team exited the ICE facility, we each reflected: the traumatic aspects of Carla’s story, the fact that she was detained despite having committed no crime as an asylum seeker, and the nature of being in a situation in which we had no access to her medical record, could provide no further follow up care, and could not refer her for mental health care. We were left with knowing only that we had listened carefully, allowed her the space to tell her story, and that we could provide this impartial service. A few months later, we were informed that Carla had been denied asylum and would be deported.

Carla’s story is a glimpse of our current system for those who have not had the opportunity to work with detainees who are survivors of torture, domestic abuse, trafficking, and religious and other forms of persecution. They face overcrowded facilities, limited access to health care, unsanitary living conditions, and the constant threat of being returned to even worse circumstances. Physicians can provide an important service to detainees by performing medical affidavits, bearing witness to center conditions, and ensuring the promotion of fundamental human rights. Carla’s story is not one of justice served, but one which illuminates the need for physician advocacy of this highly vulnerable population.

Madeline Cohen is an obstetrics-gynecology resident. Gauri G. Agarwal is an internal medicine physician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Tomgirl and tomboy: Rethinking gender stereotypes

August 26, 2021 Kevin 0
…
Next

Medicine rewards self-sacrifice often at the cost of physician happiness

August 26, 2021 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Tomgirl and tomboy: Rethinking gender stereotypes
Next Post >
Medicine rewards self-sacrifice often at the cost of physician happiness

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • An American physician in Sweden. Here’s what he thought about its health care.

    Richard Young, MD
  • How a physician keynote can highlight your conference

    Kevin Pho, MD
  • Chasing numbers contributes to physician burnout

    DrizzleMD
  • American physicians deserve timely payment

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • The black physician’s burden

    Naomi Tweyo Nkinsi

More in Policy

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

    Holland Haynie, MD
  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • AI is already replacing doctors—just not how you think

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

      Samantha Malley, FNP-C | Conditions
    • Why more doctors are choosing direct care over traditional health care

      Grace Torres-Hodges, DPM, MBA | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • AI is already replacing doctors—just not how you think

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

      Samantha Malley, FNP-C | Conditions
    • Why more doctors are choosing direct care over traditional health care

      Grace Torres-Hodges, DPM, MBA | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...