Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Could a pause in screenings increase missed cancer diagnoses?

Miles J. Varn, MD
Conditions
September 19, 2021
Share
Tweet
Share

When the COVID-19 pandemic began in the U.S. in 2020, most hospitals and physician’s offices paused elective and preventive care services to focus on treating large numbers of COVID patients, preserving medical supplies and bed space in hospitals, and reducing the risk of non-COVID patients being exposed to the virus. Cancer screenings were one of the services that were paused. In 2020, this pause resulted in an 86 percent to 94 percent drop in preventive cancer screenings compared to the same time period during the three previous years, according to data from 2.7 million electronic patient records representing 190 hospitals in 23 states. Another report, published in JAMA Open Network, found that in the early weeks of the pandemic, weekly diagnoses for breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, gastric, and esophageal cancer fell 46.4 percent. The decline was linked to the drop in screenings.

Although screenings rebounded and approached pre-pandemic levels during the summer of 2020, physicians have raised concerns that missed and delayed cancer screenings have the potential to lead to an increase in the number of people diagnosed with more advanced cancer and, possibly, 10,000 excess cancer deaths over the next decade. That concern was supported by data from the American Society of Radiation Oncologists, which noted that two-thirds of radiation oncologists surveyed noted new patients were being diagnosed with more advanced cancers.

Recently, the authors of the JAMA Open Network report updated their findings to include data on new cancer diagnoses through March 2021. They expanded the types of cancers included in the report, adding cervical and prostate cancer, and looked at new cancer diagnoses during three time periods—pre-pandemic (January 2019 to February 2020), pandemic period 1 (March to May 2020), pandemic period 2 (June to October 2020), and pandemic period 3 (November 2020 to March 2021). The data was drawn from the records of patients at Quest Diagnostics across the U.S. with orders that included ICD codes associated with the eight types of cancer.

They discovered that during pandemic period 1, diagnoses for all eight types of cancer decreased significantly, with the mean monthly number of new diagnoses decreasing 29.8 percent. For breast cancer, the decrease was 36.1 percent. In the second period, new cancer diagnoses rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, except in the case of prostate cancer.

However, in the third pandemic period, which coincided with the fall/winter 2020/21 rise in COVID cases, mean monthly numbers of newly diagnosed patients dipped again, falling significantly lower than pre-pandemic levels but not as low as in pandemic period 1 for all eight types of cancer. The current surge in COVID cases driven by the Delta variant may also drive down new diagnoses for the summer of 2021.

What does the drop in cancer screening and diagnosis mean for patients?

Delaying recommended cancer screenings has the potential to increase the risk of being diagnosed with more advanced cancer that’s more complex to treat and may be associated with poorer outcomes.

If you are anxious about getting screened and potential exposure to health care staff and other patients who may not be vaccinated or who may have an undiagnosed, asymptomatic COVID infection, the first step to getting the screenings you need is to call your doctor to talk about your concerns. Ask what steps are being taken to protect patients (physical distancing in the waiting room, limiting the number of patients in the waiting room, required face masks and appropriate PPE for patients and staff, regular cleaning and disinfection of equipment and surfaces, vaccination requirements for staff).

You should talk with your doctor about the risks of postponing screening. Factors to discuss include:

  • Your personal and family medical history
  • When you were last screened
  • History of cancer
  • Other factors that may increase your risk of cancer including genetic mutations associated with increased cancer risk, lifestyle factors like smoking, alcohol use, excess sun exposure, and age

You can also ask if there are other appropriate, effective forms of screening. For example, there are several different types of screening tests for colorectal cancer, including fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or a stool DNA test that can be done at home, although colonoscopy remains the gold standard for screening.

If you’re experiencing any symptoms that may be related to cancer, such as a lump in the breast, changes in a mole, difficulty swallowing, or blood in the stool, contact your doctor right away to schedule the needed diagnostic tests and follow-up.

Miles J. Varn is chief executive officer, PinnacleCare, and can be reached on LinkedIn.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

The degradation and devaluation of nurses

September 19, 2021 Kevin 7
…
Next

Racial disparities in surgical care [PODCAST]

September 19, 2021 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease, Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The degradation and devaluation of nurses
Next Post >
Racial disparities in surgical care [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Miles J. Varn, MD

  • Why sharing your complete medical history with your clinicians is important

    Miles J. Varn, MD
  • Managing key risk factors may lower your dementia risk

    Miles J. Varn, MD
  • Caregiver? Learn how to support older relatives at doctor’s appointments.

    Miles J. Varn, MD

Related Posts

  • Hormone replacement therapy is still linked to cancer

    Martha Rosenberg
  • We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

    Lisa N. Abaid, MD, MPH
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD
  • Despite progress in cancer care, cost and equity challenges still must be addressed

    David M. Aboulafia, MD
  • Using the Avengers to explain how cancer treatments work

    Jennifer Lycette, MD
  • Is social media a friend or foe of science?

    Michael Joyce, MD

More in Conditions

  • When hospitals act like platforms, clinicians become content

    Gerald Kuo
  • The risk of diagnostic ideology in child psychiatry

    Dr. Sami Timimi
  • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

    Richard A. Lawhern, PhD
  • A daughter’s reflection on life, death, and pancreatic cancer

    Debbie Moore-Black, RN
  • What to do if your lab results are borderline

    Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed
  • Direct primary care limitations for complex patients

    Zoe M. Crawford, LCSW
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Preventing physician burnout before it begins in med school [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • The risk of ideology in gender medicine

      William Malone, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Direct primary care vs psychotherapy models: Why they aren’t interchangeable

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden depth of the rural primary care shortage

      Esther Yu Smith, MD | Physician
    • When hospitals act like platforms, clinicians become content

      Gerald Kuo | Conditions
    • Preventing physician burnout: an educational approach

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Why high-quality embryos sometimes fail to implant [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Preventing physician burnout before it begins in med school [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • The risk of ideology in gender medicine

      William Malone, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Direct primary care vs psychotherapy models: Why they aren’t interchangeable

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden depth of the rural primary care shortage

      Esther Yu Smith, MD | Physician
    • When hospitals act like platforms, clinicians become content

      Gerald Kuo | Conditions
    • Preventing physician burnout: an educational approach

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Why high-quality embryos sometimes fail to implant [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...