Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Tumor-informed residual disease testing can help inform cancer treatment

Alexey Aleshin, MD, MBA
Conditions
January 5, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

Life can feel full of uncertainty when battling cancer, with few guarantees. “Is there still cancer in my body?” and “Will it come back?” are common questions that have long been difficult to answer confidently until recently. Advances in next-generation sequencing — and a growing understanding of how our bodies respond to illness and treatment — have brought us closer than ever to predicting our individual futures, at least when it comes to cancer.

In recent years, cancer researchers have embraced new noninvasive technologies that can detect small amounts of DNA shed by tumors into the blood, also known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This is no easy feat, as ctDNA is extremely scarce after surgery and treatment — as low as a single molecule in a tube of blood. But by broadly sequencing one’s tumor, we can identify its unique genetic signature, allowing for the creation of a highly sensitive and personalized assay that can track cancer in the body over time.

Today, this is commonly referred to as molecular residual disease (MRD) testing, and it’s quickly becoming an important tool to help oncologists inform their cancer patients’ treatment and answer questions about the road that lies ahead.

With MRD testing, a positive result means we can correctly identify who is likely to recur more than 98 percent of the time. Conversely, studies have shown that a negative result means a patient’s risk of recurrence is significantly reduced. Still, MRD tests are not being utilized enough. With roughly 35 percent of colorectal cancer patients alone eventually experiencing recurrence within five years, MRD tests must be regularly implemented into clinical practice so that more patients can have access to personalized treatment and care.

Recent regulatory moves have paved the way forward: MRD testing is now covered as reasonable and necessary for Medicare patients with a history of certain types of cancer such as colorectal cancer. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also recently issued a final local coverage determination to extend coverage for MRD testing to immunotherapy response monitoring. MRD testing in lung cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal cancer, and other types of cancer has been the focus of validation studies that could further expand MRD testing access for cancer patients.

Data generated across cancer types is showing MRD testing to be highly prognostic and predictive, proving just as precise — if not more so — than traditional diagnostic tools. Studies have shown that personalized MRD tests can detect cancer recurrence months, or even years, before radiologic imaging. And one recent study found that measuring how quickly ctDNA levels grow over time can help predict patient survival and aid oncologists in clinical decision making.

In addition, personalized MRD testing can help accurately determine if certain treatments like immunotherapy are working. Though roughly 200,000 people are on immunotherapy each year, less than a third of people will respond positively. With serial ctDNA testing, oncologists can identify early on who is most likely to benefit. This allows them to tailor the treatment plan accordingly, in partnership with the patient. For example, if personalized ctDNA testing indicates that a patient is not responding to therapy, the patient can be spared the expense and difficulties of continuing the treatment, and the patient can also be spared continued exposure to toxicities.

And for many cancer patients already experiencing the pain and anxiety associated with a cancer diagnosis, MRD testing can help further reduce the mental burden of uncertainty. Part of the true value of MRD testing, therefore, lies in the peace of mind it provides. And we’re finding that more and more patients want to know this information. Even when one tests positive for MRD, knowing this empowers them with the confidence to make the most informed treatment decisions possible for their care. It gives them that extra bit of reassurance and puts them back in the driver’s seat. It also often allows them to act early, improving the chances they will be able to successfully treat the cancer.

As we continue to actively research applications for MRD testing across various cancer types and generate data to support novel technologies that can detect ctDNA with extremely high levels of precision, we bring more answers and information to more cancer patients. Tumor-informed MRD testing gives us the opportunity to transform knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment, helping us push forward the field of personalized medicine and save lives.

Alexey Aleshin is a hematology-oncology physician and general manager of early cancer detection and interim head of medical affairs of oncology, Natera. He can be reached on Twitter @aaleshin.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Unless we get back to the basics, there will be no end to the pandemic

January 5, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Depression is a notification that the old patterns are not working

January 5, 2022 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Unless we get back to the basics, there will be no end to the pandemic
Next Post >
Depression is a notification that the old patterns are not working

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Hormone replacement therapy is still linked to cancer

    Martha Rosenberg
  • Including the patient perspective on tumor boards

    Don S. Dizon, MD
  • The dismantling of informed consent is a disaster

    David Penner
  • How to avoid treatment you don’t need

    Marshall Allen
  • We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

    Lisa N. Abaid, MD, MPH
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD

More in Conditions

  • Financing cancer or fighting it: the real cost of tobacco

    Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya
  • 5 cancer myths that could delay your diagnosis or treatment

    Joseph Alvarnas, MD
  • When bleeding disorders meet IVF: Navigating von Willebrand disease in fertility treatment

    Oluyemisi Famuyiwa, MD
  • What one diagnosis can change: the movement to make dining safer

    Lianne Mandelbaum, PT
  • How kindness in disguise is holding women back in academic medicine

    Sylk Sotto, EdD, MPS, MBA
  • Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

    American College of Physicians
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • Reclaiming trust in online health advice [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech
    • When service doesn’t mean another certification

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Financing cancer or fighting it: the real cost of tobacco

      Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya | Conditions
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • Reclaiming trust in online health advice [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech
    • When service doesn’t mean another certification

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Financing cancer or fighting it: the real cost of tobacco

      Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya | Conditions
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...