Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Tumor-informed residual disease testing can help inform cancer treatment

Alexey Aleshin, MD, MBA
Conditions
January 5, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

Life can feel full of uncertainty when battling cancer, with few guarantees. “Is there still cancer in my body?” and “Will it come back?” are common questions that have long been difficult to answer confidently until recently. Advances in next-generation sequencing — and a growing understanding of how our bodies respond to illness and treatment — have brought us closer than ever to predicting our individual futures, at least when it comes to cancer.

In recent years, cancer researchers have embraced new noninvasive technologies that can detect small amounts of DNA shed by tumors into the blood, also known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This is no easy feat, as ctDNA is extremely scarce after surgery and treatment — as low as a single molecule in a tube of blood. But by broadly sequencing one’s tumor, we can identify its unique genetic signature, allowing for the creation of a highly sensitive and personalized assay that can track cancer in the body over time.

Today, this is commonly referred to as molecular residual disease (MRD) testing, and it’s quickly becoming an important tool to help oncologists inform their cancer patients’ treatment and answer questions about the road that lies ahead.

With MRD testing, a positive result means we can correctly identify who is likely to recur more than 98 percent of the time. Conversely, studies have shown that a negative result means a patient’s risk of recurrence is significantly reduced. Still, MRD tests are not being utilized enough. With roughly 35 percent of colorectal cancer patients alone eventually experiencing recurrence within five years, MRD tests must be regularly implemented into clinical practice so that more patients can have access to personalized treatment and care.

Recent regulatory moves have paved the way forward: MRD testing is now covered as reasonable and necessary for Medicare patients with a history of certain types of cancer such as colorectal cancer. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also recently issued a final local coverage determination to extend coverage for MRD testing to immunotherapy response monitoring. MRD testing in lung cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal cancer, and other types of cancer has been the focus of validation studies that could further expand MRD testing access for cancer patients.

Data generated across cancer types is showing MRD testing to be highly prognostic and predictive, proving just as precise — if not more so — than traditional diagnostic tools. Studies have shown that personalized MRD tests can detect cancer recurrence months, or even years, before radiologic imaging. And one recent study found that measuring how quickly ctDNA levels grow over time can help predict patient survival and aid oncologists in clinical decision making.

In addition, personalized MRD testing can help accurately determine if certain treatments like immunotherapy are working. Though roughly 200,000 people are on immunotherapy each year, less than a third of people will respond positively. With serial ctDNA testing, oncologists can identify early on who is most likely to benefit. This allows them to tailor the treatment plan accordingly, in partnership with the patient. For example, if personalized ctDNA testing indicates that a patient is not responding to therapy, the patient can be spared the expense and difficulties of continuing the treatment, and the patient can also be spared continued exposure to toxicities.

And for many cancer patients already experiencing the pain and anxiety associated with a cancer diagnosis, MRD testing can help further reduce the mental burden of uncertainty. Part of the true value of MRD testing, therefore, lies in the peace of mind it provides. And we’re finding that more and more patients want to know this information. Even when one tests positive for MRD, knowing this empowers them with the confidence to make the most informed treatment decisions possible for their care. It gives them that extra bit of reassurance and puts them back in the driver’s seat. It also often allows them to act early, improving the chances they will be able to successfully treat the cancer.

As we continue to actively research applications for MRD testing across various cancer types and generate data to support novel technologies that can detect ctDNA with extremely high levels of precision, we bring more answers and information to more cancer patients. Tumor-informed MRD testing gives us the opportunity to transform knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment, helping us push forward the field of personalized medicine and save lives.

Alexey Aleshin is a hematology-oncology physician and general manager of early cancer detection and interim head of medical affairs of oncology, Natera. He can be reached on Twitter @aaleshin.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Unless we get back to the basics, there will be no end to the pandemic

January 5, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Depression is a notification that the old patterns are not working

January 5, 2022 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Unless we get back to the basics, there will be no end to the pandemic
Next Post >
Depression is a notification that the old patterns are not working

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Hormone replacement therapy is still linked to cancer

    Martha Rosenberg
  • Including the patient perspective on tumor boards

    Don S. Dizon, MD
  • The dismantling of informed consent is a disaster

    David Penner
  • How to avoid treatment you don’t need

    Marshall Allen
  • We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

    Lisa N. Abaid, MD, MPH
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD

More in Conditions

  • Addressing menstrual health inequities in adolescents

    Callia Georgoulis
  • Healing beyond the surface: Why proper chronic wound care matters

    Alvin May, MD
  • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

    William J. Bannon IV
  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing menstrual health inequities in adolescents

      Callia Georgoulis | Conditions
    • How to advance workforce development through research mentorship and evidence-based management

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • The truth about perfection and identity in health care

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

      All Levels Leadership | Physician
    • Healing beyond the surface: Why proper chronic wound care matters

      Alvin May, MD | Conditions
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing menstrual health inequities in adolescents

      Callia Georgoulis | Conditions
    • How to advance workforce development through research mentorship and evidence-based management

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • The truth about perfection and identity in health care

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

      All Levels Leadership | Physician
    • Healing beyond the surface: Why proper chronic wound care matters

      Alvin May, MD | Conditions
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...