Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why body type standards are wrong in measuring health

Marc Nelson
Conditions
November 4, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

When you visit your doctor for your regular check-up, just like every human being, your body and health are judged by three main scientific standards to determine if you are healthy and “normal.”

Standard 1 is the Standard Scientific Human Body Anatomy Book Body Type (BT1) found in any scientifically approved human body anatomy book. According to mainstream science and medical doctors, every human being is born in a standard BT1. Even if you are diagnosed with an abnormality like scoliosis or Poland’s Syndrome, you are still a BT1, just with a specific diagnosis. The BT1 is not accurate because it fails to take into account genetics and skinny fat (cellulite, thin fat, loose skin, saggy skin, creepy skin, normal weight obesity).

Standard 2 is the Body Mass Index (BMI), officially used since the mid-1980s. BMI is not accurate because it, too, fails to take into account genetics and skinny fat. It is also inaccurate because it does not calculate excess muscle/mass. For someone like Dwayne Johnson (The Rock), his BMI calculation likely places him in the overweight or obese columns of the standard BMI chart weight scale, but he most certainly is neither.

Standard 3 is the basal metabolic rate (BMR), calculated through the Mifflin St. Jeor equation and Harris-Benedict formula for activity. The standard BMR calculations do not incorporate skinny fat like the other two standards. Science recognizes that one pound of muscle burns six calories per day, but one pound of fat/skinny fat only burns 2-3 calories, all of which affect metabolism. If you have skinny fat on your body where there should be muscle/mass, but you are relying on the standard BMR calculations, you are likely eating too many calories per day.

The evolving definition of obesity

Until now, mainstream scientists and medical doctors have viewed obesity strictly as an energy imbalance. In other words, too many calories are consumed daily above your standard BMR, which takes you outside your safe BMI chart weight range columns (green) into the unsafe obese columns (red). Obesity is defined as having too much fat on your body.

Again, according to mainstream scientists and medical doctors, to lose the extra fat (calories) weight on your body and get back within your safe BMI to once again be a standard BT1, all you have to do is clean up your diet to reduce your daily calorie intake to at or below standard BMR for a long enough period of time. You can also increase calories burned through proper exercise to expedite the process. Sounds simple enough, right?

But there are real problems with this thinking and approach that mainstream scientists and medical doctors cannot and refuse to explain. For one, there are countless people worldwide who, even when they are within their safe BMI, still experience some form of skinny fat, including normal weight obesity, and do not look like the standard BT1. For many more, this has been a fact since birth — they have never been or looked like the standard BT1. Moreover, there are many people globally who, according to the standard BMI chart, are overweight or obese, but all their other health-indicating factors, including blood pressure, heart rate, cholesterol, blood sugar (A1c), etc. are normal, which has led to the more recent scientific terms obesity paradox and metabolically healthy obese (MHO).

The obesity epidemic, normal weight obesity, and body type science

The global obesity epidemic is getting worse. According to NIH.gov and CDC.gov, the prevalence of obesity in the U.S. has increased from 30.5 percent to 41.9 percent over the last two decades with severe obesity increasing from 4.7 percent to 9.2 percent. Furthermore, WHO.org reports that more than 1 billion people worldwide are obese, equating to 650 million adults, 340 million adolescents, and 39 million children. The scientific data clearly supports obesity being a dangerous disease that increases the likelihood of experiencing other serious conditions and diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, gallbladder disease, cancer, and stroke while reducing life expectancy.

Normal weight obesity, being within your safe BMI but still having too much fat on your body, carries with it many of the same risks as obesity. The overall annual health care costs associated with the disease of obesity are astronomical and unsustainable. Body type science is the key to real sustainability.

Scientific body type is determined by genetics. Diet, exercise, and lifestyle also play main roles. As body type science research grows and we better comprehend how genetics, including skinny fat, diet, exercise, and lifestyle affect the human body — particularly in terms of shape and type, we will more clearly understand what it means to be a healthy human being. This, in turn, will help mitigate the obesity epidemic and improve aggregate human health.

Marc Nelson is a scientific researcher.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

A doctor's foray into online therapy

November 4, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

My daughter and COVID: a tale of 3 doctors

November 4, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Obesity

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A doctor's foray into online therapy
Next Post >
My daughter and COVID: a tale of 3 doctors

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Marc Nelson

  • The rise of spiritual science: Uniting the soul and science

    Marc Nelson
  • My journey being gaslighted about obesity, skinny fat, and body type

    Marc Nelson

Related Posts

  • Is social media a friend or foe of science?

    Michael Joyce, MD
  • Hormone replacement therapy is still linked to cancer

    Martha Rosenberg
  • We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

    Lisa N. Abaid, MD, MPH
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD
  • Despite progress in cancer care, cost and equity challenges still must be addressed

    David M. Aboulafia, MD
  • Using the Avengers to explain how cancer treatments work

    Jennifer Lycette, MD

More in Conditions

  • Breast cancer and the daughter who gave everything

    Dr. Damane Zehra
  • Visual language in health care: Why words aren’t enough

    Hamid Moghimi, RPN
  • Why dietary advice changes: It is not the food, it is the world

    Gerald Kuo
  • Blood in urine after a child’s injury: When to worry

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Living with vitiligo: Overcoming shame and control

    Dr. Reshma Stanislaus
  • Post-stroke cognitive impairment: the hidden challenge of recovery

    Rida Ghani
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
    • Smart design choices improve patient care outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Smart design choices improve patient care outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breast cancer and the daughter who gave everything

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Conditions
    • Physician wellness is not yoga: Why resilience training fails

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • Visual language in health care: Why words aren’t enough

      Hamid Moghimi, RPN | Conditions
    • The coffee stain metaphor: Overcoming perfectionism in medicine

      Maryna Mammoliti, MD | Physician
    • From pediatrics to geriatrics: How treating children prepared me for dementia care

      Loretta Cody, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
    • Smart design choices improve patient care outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Smart design choices improve patient care outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Breast cancer and the daughter who gave everything

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Conditions
    • Physician wellness is not yoga: Why resilience training fails

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • Visual language in health care: Why words aren’t enough

      Hamid Moghimi, RPN | Conditions
    • The coffee stain metaphor: Overcoming perfectionism in medicine

      Maryna Mammoliti, MD | Physician
    • From pediatrics to geriatrics: How treating children prepared me for dementia care

      Loretta Cody, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...