Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How gender and race deepen the cancer care divide

Meera Ravindranathan, MD
Physician
January 20, 2024
Share
Tweet
Share

In 2023, roughly 2 million people will have been diagnosed with some form of cancer, and while cancer can affect everyone, it does not affect everyone equally. Women – especially women of color and women with lower socioeconomic standing – often face significant hurdles when it comes to accessing the health care they need to prevent, treat, and survive cancer.

The downstream effect

Although there have been significant efforts to address gender disparities in cancer care, structural sexism, the unequal distribution of resources and power, remains a challenge in oncology, which negatively affects both female physicians and patients. A 2019 study around federal funding and gender found that female scientists receive fewer grants, and as much as 38 percent less in funding, than their male counterparts. Female researchers tend to prioritize studies around female-specific health problems – including cancers that disproportionately affect women. When these physicians and scientists don’t receive adequate funding, it affects the amount of research being done on women’s cancers, as well as the ability to correctly diagnose and treat these cancers. Moreover, long-held systemic biases within the medical field have resulted in fewer women being awarded National Institutes of Health grants or being promoted to department chairs in radiation and medical oncology.

This gender gap has followed women out of academia and into their daily practices. A recent study of gynecologic oncologists found that the median salary for women was $380,000 and $500,000 for men in that same profession. In oncology specifically, nearly one in four oncologists report burnout, with self-identified female and lesbian/gay/bisexual faculty at the highest risk.

This combination of underrepresentation in leadership positions, lack of equitable funding, and higher rates of burnout in the workplace for female oncologists trickles down from an institutional level and ultimately impacts the quality of care received by female cancer patients.

Disparities in female cancer care

In general, survival after a cancer diagnosis is shorter for people of all races who have a lower socioeconomic status (SES) and who live in a more rural area compared to those with higher SES and in or near a metropolitan area. However, women – regardless of race or SES – overwhelmingly report significant barriers to receiving care. These include having their symptoms dismissed, being denied testing, and constantly being “referred out” to a myriad of specialists who are often unable to provide solutions or diagnoses to alleviate their symptoms. There are few peer-reviewed journals regarding women’s health, and much of the focus of women’s health is on obstetrics and reproductive health, while female-specific diseases often fall by the wayside. Of the five main types of gynecologic cancers, only cervical cancer has screening tests for early detection, when treatment is often most effective. Because symptoms for gynecological cancers tend to be vague and can be attributed to other health issues, women regularly face hurdles to getting tested for these cancers and oftentimes must make multiple visits to various specialists before their complaints are taken seriously.

Additionally, women are still underrepresented in clinical trials, even in cancers that have a higher prevalence in women. Compared to men, women are 50 to 75 percent more likely to experience an adverse drug reaction, making their inclusion in clinical trials imperative to understanding the full scope of a drug’s potential adverse side effects and ensuring the correct dosage is properly administered based on an individual’s physiological characteristics.

While researchers have made many advances in treating a variety of cancers, people of color, those with lower SES, and individuals living in rural areas have not benefited equitably from these advances in cancer care. Across the board, Black people have a higher cancer burden and face greater obstacles to cancer prevention, detection, treatment, and survival. Black people have the highest death rate and shortest survival of any racial/ethnic group for most cancers in the U.S., with Black women 40 percent more likely to die of breast cancer than White women and twice as likely to die if they are over the age of 50.

Incidentally, Black women have reported experiencing significant discrimination in the medical setting. For cervical cancer, specifically, where Black women have the second highest incidence rate and the highest mortality rate, many women have reported not having their pain or symptoms taken seriously, leading to a general sense of distrust among the Black community when it comes to the medical field. This anticipation around potential discrimination coupled with the notion that their grievances will not be heard or believed by practitioners has led to Black women delaying seeking out medical treatment or skipping preventative appointments altogether, which ultimately leads to cancers being diagnosed at later stages with less optimal prognoses.

Addressing gender disparities

To bridge the gap in care experienced by female patients – especially those of color or lower SES ─ there must be a collaborative effort to prioritize women’s health, particularly as it relates to cancer. This begins with increased funding and improved visibility of the specific health issues women face. Prioritizing funding for women’s health research can lead to the creation of more diagnostic and screening tests tied to improved preventative care and increased potential for catching diseases, such as cancer, at earlier stages.

Additionally, women must be seen and treated as equals to their male peers – both within academia and while practicing. Ensuring women are paid equally for equal work, are included in leadership positions, and feel safe and comfortable within their working environment can lead to better overall outcomes as it pertains to women’s health. Additionally, practitioners must strive to improve the quality of care received across racial and socioeconomic statuses to eradicate the prevalent mistrust often associated with the medical field. Women are a diverse and complex group of patients in the medical system, and they must be treated as such to truly abolish the gender disparities in health care.

Meera Ravindranathan is a hematologist-oncologist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

Just how personal should personal statements be on medical school applications?

January 20, 2024 Kevin 0
…
Next

Navigating controversy: dialectics in conflict resolution [PODCAST]

January 20, 2024 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Just how personal should personal statements be on medical school applications?
Next Post >
Navigating controversy: dialectics in conflict resolution [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • “System-ness”: the key to successful health care transformation

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Health care wins, losses, and lessons

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Why new cancer treatments cannot save us

    Yongjia Wang
  • A letter to a cancer patient in palliative care

    Alison Vasa
  • Addressing disparities in gynecological care for women with physical disabilities

    Geffen Treiman
  • Cancer care costs everyone too much. What can we do about it?

    Andrew Hertler, MD

More in Physician

  • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

    Neil Baum, MD
  • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

    Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD
  • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Why listening to parents’ intuition can save lives in pediatric care

    Tokunbo Akande, MD, MPH
  • Finding balance and meaning in medical practice: a holistic approach to professional fulfillment

    Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib
  • How regulatory overreach is destroying innovation in U.S. health care

    Kayvan Haddadan, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...