Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How physicians can fix media bias with science

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
August 19, 2024
Share
Tweet
Share

The assassination attempt is the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The “gaslighting” is over. The rules for truth by legacy media are never examined for objectivity. We do not have the Inquisition in the United States; we have the legacy media.

One “fact-checker” measures truth by “Pinocchios.” There is a better way—hypothesis testing. Who better to know about hypothesis testing than a physician?

What if the facts about how Medicare is represented by two media outlets are tested? Hypothesis testing follows four rules:

1. Identify the truth: The truth is out there. Truth-telling has nine phases, each representing a specific duty that pertains to an ideal storyteller.

  • The initiation phase: The duty to collect all the facts.
  • The acceptance phase: The duty to accept a fact verifiable by objective evidence.
  • The rejection phase: The duty to reject an artifact not verifiable by objective evidence.
  • The attribution phase: The duty to source the facts.
  • The external review phase: The duty to examine the motives of others to influence facts.
  • The internal review phase: The duty to examine a personal motive to influence facts.
  • The discrimination phase: The duty to distinguish an opinion from a fact. Opinions, even a consensus by authorities, are not facts.
  • The equanimity phase: The duty not to contaminate a fact with emotion.
  • The analysis phase: The duty to use facts, and only facts, to arrive at a conclusion.

2. State the subject matter: It is the actual storyteller’s version of reality. The subject matter contains the same facts, but some may be subtly misrepresented, just enough to satisfy the conclusion. The subject matter is divided into the same nine phases as they pertain to the actual storyteller.

3. The Test: Each phase of the subject matter is compared to its counterpart in the truth. The comparison measures the “relative risk” resulting from the misrepresentation of a fact by the actual storyteller.

  • If there is no difference, the relative risk equals 1.0.
  • If there is a difference, the relative risk is greater than 1.0. A relative risk greater than 1.0 is a Risk of Bias. For the sake of transparency, the assignments of Risk of Bias are documented for anyone to see and, if need be, to dispute.

A single sample of nine relative risks emerges representing each phase in the subject matter. Some are 1.0, and some are greater than 1.0. Because storytellers naturally tend to exaggerate a fact, producing a relative risk greater than 1.0, this discrepancy itself is not proof of a departure from the truth. Bias is intentional. For proof, the collective difference among the nine relative risks in all phases of the subject matter must be statistically significant.

4. Analysis: To determine a statistically significant difference, the sample is analyzed using the single-sample T-test, found in any statistical software. The level of significance, or alpha, is 0.05, which corresponds to 95 percent confidence. The population mean, or mu, is 1.0, which corresponds to the truth. The result is the p-value.

  • If the p-value is equal to or greater than 0.05, there is no statistically significant difference between the subject matter and the truth. Although there may be a phase that contains an exaggeration, the risk of bias is not sufficient for it to misrepresent reality. Therefore, there is no bias. This is the null hypothesis. If the null hypothesis is retained, the subject matter is the null hypothesis.
  • If the p-value is less than 0.05, there is a statistically significant difference. Therefore, there is quantifiable proof of bias. This is the alternate hypothesis. The alternate hypothesis is accepted by default. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the subject matter is the alternate hypothesis.

Hypothesis testing, unlike “Pinocchios,” objectively makes a valid comparison between truth and facsimile. A Pinocchio, while quantitative, has no level of confidence. However, a p-value has a level of confidence of 95 percent. For a rational person, 95 percent confidence stands in stark contrast to a Pinocchio.

As an example of hypothesis testing, the truth consists of the verifiable facts about Medicare that are publicly available in government documents. The subject matter consists of two media outlets’ versions of the truth.

One storyteller is Fox News. The sample is 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.5, 1.5, 2.0, 1.0, and the p-value is 0.051893. The collective risk of bias is not sufficient to misrepresent reality.

The other storyteller is MSNBC. The sample is 1.5, 1.5, 1.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.5, 1.5, 2.0, 2.0, and the p-value is 0.000022. The collective risk of bias is sufficient to misrepresent reality.

The difference between the two p-values shows that MSNBC’s version of Medicare is 99.9 percent less reliable than Fox’s version.

ADVERTISEMENT

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

Why I won't let my wife see her EOBs anymore

August 19, 2024 Kevin 0
…
Next

How compassionate communities can transform the lives of schizophrenia patients

August 19, 2024 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Mainstream media

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why I won't let my wife see her EOBs anymore
Next Post >
How compassionate communities can transform the lives of schizophrenia patients

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • How physicians can reclaim control over medical malpractice risks

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The hidden cost of malpractice: Why doctors are losing control

    Howard Smith, MD
  • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Social media: Striking a balance for physicians and parents

    Dawn Baker, MD
  • I was trolled by another physician on social media. I am happy I did not respond.

    Casey P. Schukow, DO
  • Are negative news cycles and social media injurious to our health?

    Rabia Jalal, MD
  • How I used social media to get promoted to professor

    David R. Stukus, MD
  • Sharing mental health issues on social media

    Tarena Lofton
  • How physicians can engage on social media

    Alpa Patel Shah, DO

More in Physician

  • 9 proven ways to gain cooperation in health care without commanding

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Why physicians deserve more than an oxygen mask

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • More than a meeting: Finding education, inspiration, and community in internal medicine [PODCAST]

    American College of Physicians & The Podcast by KevinMD
  • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

    Trisza Leann Ray, DO
  • How physicians can reclaim control over medical malpractice risks

    Howard Smith, MD
  • Boost patient satisfaction with the power of fragrance

    Neil Baum, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • From hospital bed to harsh truths: a writer’s unexpected journey

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
    • Reclaiming trust in online health advice [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The business lesson new doctors must unlearn

      Stanley Liu, MD | Finance
    • 9 proven ways to gain cooperation in health care without commanding

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

      Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH | Conditions
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • From hospital bed to harsh truths: a writer’s unexpected journey

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
    • Reclaiming trust in online health advice [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The business lesson new doctors must unlearn

      Stanley Liu, MD | Finance
    • 9 proven ways to gain cooperation in health care without commanding

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...