Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

A clarion call about medical malpractice to leaders in health care

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
January 8, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

There are one million physicians practicing medicine in the United States. No medical intervention they recommend is immune from a complication. The exact number of complications is unknown. Some are medical errors inherent to the intervention, while others are random errors of nature caused by external factors.

When you add to this the fact that there are more lawyers in the United States today than ever before, something has to give. There are approximately 64,000 personal injury law firms. Of the unknown number of complications, 85,000 receive their attention—whether from a medical error or an error of nature. Each firm has a financial incentive to adjudicate a complication. It follows that 85,000 practitioners and facilities are sued every year.

This trend has been progressive for 50 years, beginning in 1975. At that time, the School of Health Policy and Management at the University of California foresaw a problem: bias in the system resulting in error-prone findings. Researchers identified two sources of bias: medical experts and the judicial threshold of preponderance of the evidence. Proving or disproving a distinction between a medical error and an error of nature, therefore, becomes scientifically ineffectual.

As a management science principle states, “Whatever gets measured, gets managed.” Measuring preponderance of evidence manages evidence. This serves the financial interests of lawyers but little else. This is the problem in a nutshell.

There is always money. All potential defendants have malpractice insurance to indemnify against medical errors. There is always self-interest. For each plaintiff attorney, there is a defense attorney. Both use preponderance of evidence to validate the merit of a claim. They need to justify their existence and know no other way.

Preponderance of evidence is their legal standard. It is defined as 50 percent probability plus a scintilla. This corresponds to a level of confidence slightly better than a coin toss—50-50. These lawyers retain medical experts—physicians who fill a market need. This is how free markets work. To be hired by a lawyer, these physicians are required to use this same standard. However, this is not how professionalism works. When doctors are obliged by lawyers to betray their own professional standard in favor of a legal standard, they act unprofessionally and threaten validity.

Indeed, there is a professional standard for doctors: the scientific method. Ordinarily, this is how physicians make decisions. It determines cause and effect by measuring differences between a desired result and an undesired one with a level of confidence of 95 percent. This is what doctors do. There is no better way to distinguish a medical error from an error of nature. If the difference is measured, the difference can be managed.

The same principle applies to accountants and actuaries working for malpractice carriers. Preponderance of evidence is not an accounting standard. They use cost drivers, such as dollars per error-prone opinion. When error-prone opinions are measured, error-prone opinions are managed.

The solution is obvious: measure the right thing. Return to the scientific method. It has been around since the days of Sir Francis Bacon. Ultimately, it is the one standard that underlies professional norms for doctors, actuaries, other decision-makers, and even lawyers. I adapt the scientific method for medical malpractice by using preponderance of evidence with scintilla at 45 percent. This adaptation has been published and peer-reviewed.

Anyone claiming to be a leader in health care and organized medicine knows—or should know—how to use the scientific method. If they do not or are oblivious to it, as far as I am concerned, they are “pretenders.” They feather their own caps. This is not what leaders do. I have their number, and soon so will everyone else because they expose themselves.

They stage a coup in management science. No matter your capacity—whether as a patient, lawyer, hospital administrator, practitioner of any sort, medical expert, health care administrator, or politician—you are, have been, or will be involved in medical malpractice litigation. There is no escaping it. Indifference is no longer an excuse. Either step up or step out.

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]

January 7, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

January 8, 2025 Kevin 1
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • The hidden incentives driving frivolous malpractice lawsuits

    Howard Smith, MD
  • How doctors can stop frivolous lawsuits before they start

    Howard Smith, MD
  • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Major medical groups back mandatory COVID vaccine for health care workers

    Molly Walker
  • What makes health care workers superhuman

    Eric Tian
  • The unspoken skill of touch in health care

    Natalie Enyedi
  • Medical trainees need knowledge and education on health care systems and policy

    Daniel Arteaga, MD, MBA and Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA
  • The role of medical education in perpetuating health care disparities

    Anonymous
  • The rural health care crisis and medical education

    Nick Richwagen, Evan Chen, and Jacob Riegler

More in Physician

  • How women physicians can go from burnout to thriving

    Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH
  • Why more doctors are choosing direct care over traditional health care

    Grace Torres-Hodges, DPM, MBA
  • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

    Neil Baum, MD
  • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

    Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD
  • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Why listening to parents’ intuition can save lives in pediatric care

    Tokunbo Akande, MD, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How women physicians can go from burnout to thriving

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

      William J. Bannon IV | Conditions
    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How women physicians can go from burnout to thriving

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

      William J. Bannon IV | Conditions
    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...