Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

A clarion call about medical malpractice to leaders in health care

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
January 8, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

There are one million physicians practicing medicine in the United States. No medical intervention they recommend is immune from a complication. The exact number of complications is unknown. Some are medical errors inherent to the intervention, while others are random errors of nature caused by external factors.

When you add to this the fact that there are more lawyers in the United States today than ever before, something has to give. There are approximately 64,000 personal injury law firms. Of the unknown number of complications, 85,000 receive their attention—whether from a medical error or an error of nature. Each firm has a financial incentive to adjudicate a complication. It follows that 85,000 practitioners and facilities are sued every year.

This trend has been progressive for 50 years, beginning in 1975. At that time, the School of Health Policy and Management at the University of California foresaw a problem: bias in the system resulting in error-prone findings. Researchers identified two sources of bias: medical experts and the judicial threshold of preponderance of the evidence. Proving or disproving a distinction between a medical error and an error of nature, therefore, becomes scientifically ineffectual.

As a management science principle states, “Whatever gets measured, gets managed.” Measuring preponderance of evidence manages evidence. This serves the financial interests of lawyers but little else. This is the problem in a nutshell.

There is always money. All potential defendants have malpractice insurance to indemnify against medical errors. There is always self-interest. For each plaintiff attorney, there is a defense attorney. Both use preponderance of evidence to validate the merit of a claim. They need to justify their existence and know no other way.

Preponderance of evidence is their legal standard. It is defined as 50 percent probability plus a scintilla. This corresponds to a level of confidence slightly better than a coin toss—50-50. These lawyers retain medical experts—physicians who fill a market need. This is how free markets work. To be hired by a lawyer, these physicians are required to use this same standard. However, this is not how professionalism works. When doctors are obliged by lawyers to betray their own professional standard in favor of a legal standard, they act unprofessionally and threaten validity.

Indeed, there is a professional standard for doctors: the scientific method. Ordinarily, this is how physicians make decisions. It determines cause and effect by measuring differences between a desired result and an undesired one with a level of confidence of 95 percent. This is what doctors do. There is no better way to distinguish a medical error from an error of nature. If the difference is measured, the difference can be managed.

The same principle applies to accountants and actuaries working for malpractice carriers. Preponderance of evidence is not an accounting standard. They use cost drivers, such as dollars per error-prone opinion. When error-prone opinions are measured, error-prone opinions are managed.

The solution is obvious: measure the right thing. Return to the scientific method. It has been around since the days of Sir Francis Bacon. Ultimately, it is the one standard that underlies professional norms for doctors, actuaries, other decision-makers, and even lawyers. I adapt the scientific method for medical malpractice by using preponderance of evidence with scintilla at 45 percent. This adaptation has been published and peer-reviewed.

Anyone claiming to be a leader in health care and organized medicine knows—or should know—how to use the scientific method. If they do not or are oblivious to it, as far as I am concerned, they are “pretenders.” They feather their own caps. This is not what leaders do. I have their number, and soon so will everyone else because they expose themselves.

They stage a coup in management science. No matter your capacity—whether as a patient, lawyer, hospital administrator, practitioner of any sort, medical expert, health care administrator, or politician—you are, have been, or will be involved in medical malpractice litigation. There is no escaping it. Indifference is no longer an excuse. Either step up or step out.

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]

January 7, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

January 8, 2025 Kevin 1
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The shocking silence of top law firms on frivolous medical lawsuits

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The medical malpractice system is broken: Who really benefits?

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Major medical groups back mandatory COVID vaccine for health care workers

    Molly Walker
  • What makes health care workers superhuman

    Eric Tian
  • The unspoken skill of touch in health care

    Natalie Enyedi
  • Medical trainees need knowledge and education on health care systems and policy

    Daniel Arteaga, MD, MBA and Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA
  • The role of medical education in perpetuating health care disparities

    Anonymous
  • The rural health care crisis and medical education

    Nick Richwagen, Evan Chen, and Jacob Riegler

More in Physician

  • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

    Pamela Adelstein, MD
  • When rock bottom is a turning point: Why the turmoil at HHS may be a blessing in disguise

    Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD
  • How grief transformed a psychiatrist’s approach to patient care

    Devina Maya Wadhwa, MD
  • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

    Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Alzheimer’s and the family: Opening the conversation with children [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • AI in mental health: a new frontier for therapy and support

      Tim Rubin, PsyD | Conditions
    • What prostate cancer taught this physician about being a patient

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why fearing AI is really about fearing ourselves

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Alzheimer’s and the family: Opening the conversation with children [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • AI in mental health: a new frontier for therapy and support

      Tim Rubin, PsyD | Conditions
    • What prostate cancer taught this physician about being a patient

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why fearing AI is really about fearing ourselves

      Bhargav Raman, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...