Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

A clarion call about medical malpractice to leaders in health care

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
January 8, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

There are one million physicians practicing medicine in the United States. No medical intervention they recommend is immune from a complication. The exact number of complications is unknown. Some are medical errors inherent to the intervention, while others are random errors of nature caused by external factors.

When you add to this the fact that there are more lawyers in the United States today than ever before, something has to give. There are approximately 64,000 personal injury law firms. Of the unknown number of complications, 85,000 receive their attention—whether from a medical error or an error of nature. Each firm has a financial incentive to adjudicate a complication. It follows that 85,000 practitioners and facilities are sued every year.

This trend has been progressive for 50 years, beginning in 1975. At that time, the School of Health Policy and Management at the University of California foresaw a problem: bias in the system resulting in error-prone findings. Researchers identified two sources of bias: medical experts and the judicial threshold of preponderance of the evidence. Proving or disproving a distinction between a medical error and an error of nature, therefore, becomes scientifically ineffectual.

As a management science principle states, “Whatever gets measured, gets managed.” Measuring preponderance of evidence manages evidence. This serves the financial interests of lawyers but little else. This is the problem in a nutshell.

There is always money. All potential defendants have malpractice insurance to indemnify against medical errors. There is always self-interest. For each plaintiff attorney, there is a defense attorney. Both use preponderance of evidence to validate the merit of a claim. They need to justify their existence and know no other way.

Preponderance of evidence is their legal standard. It is defined as 50 percent probability plus a scintilla. This corresponds to a level of confidence slightly better than a coin toss—50-50. These lawyers retain medical experts—physicians who fill a market need. This is how free markets work. To be hired by a lawyer, these physicians are required to use this same standard. However, this is not how professionalism works. When doctors are obliged by lawyers to betray their own professional standard in favor of a legal standard, they act unprofessionally and threaten validity.

Indeed, there is a professional standard for doctors: the scientific method. Ordinarily, this is how physicians make decisions. It determines cause and effect by measuring differences between a desired result and an undesired one with a level of confidence of 95 percent. This is what doctors do. There is no better way to distinguish a medical error from an error of nature. If the difference is measured, the difference can be managed.

The same principle applies to accountants and actuaries working for malpractice carriers. Preponderance of evidence is not an accounting standard. They use cost drivers, such as dollars per error-prone opinion. When error-prone opinions are measured, error-prone opinions are managed.

The solution is obvious: measure the right thing. Return to the scientific method. It has been around since the days of Sir Francis Bacon. Ultimately, it is the one standard that underlies professional norms for doctors, actuaries, other decision-makers, and even lawyers. I adapt the scientific method for medical malpractice by using preponderance of evidence with scintilla at 45 percent. This adaptation has been published and peer-reviewed.

Anyone claiming to be a leader in health care and organized medicine knows—or should know—how to use the scientific method. If they do not or are oblivious to it, as far as I am concerned, they are “pretenders.” They feather their own caps. This is not what leaders do. I have their number, and soon so will everyone else because they expose themselves.

They stage a coup in management science. No matter your capacity—whether as a patient, lawyer, hospital administrator, practitioner of any sort, medical expert, health care administrator, or politician—you are, have been, or will be involved in medical malpractice litigation. There is no escaping it. Indifference is no longer an excuse. Either step up or step out.

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]

January 7, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

January 8, 2025 Kevin 1
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How cognitive biases are sabotaging your wealth-building efforts [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Reviving the emotional flatline: Addressing burnout in health care professionals

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • The hidden cost of malpractice: Why doctors are losing control

    Howard Smith, MD
  • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The shocking silence of top law firms on frivolous medical lawsuits

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Major medical groups back mandatory COVID vaccine for health care workers

    Molly Walker
  • What makes health care workers superhuman

    Eric Tian
  • The unspoken skill of touch in health care

    Natalie Enyedi
  • Medical trainees need knowledge and education on health care systems and policy

    Daniel Arteaga, MD, MBA and Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA
  • The role of medical education in perpetuating health care disparities

    Anonymous
  • The rural health care crisis and medical education

    Nick Richwagen, Evan Chen, and Jacob Riegler

More in Physician

  • How a homeless mathematician taught me the true meaning of success

    Tariq Shaheed, DO
  • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

    Kayvan Haddadan, MD
  • ER threats aren’t rare anymore—they’re routine

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Love on life support: a powerful reminder from the ICU

    Syed Ahmad Moosa, MD
  • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • From basketball to bedside: Finding connection through March Madness

    Caitlin J. McCarthy, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Do Jewish students face rising bias in holistic admissions?

      Anonymous | Education
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • How a homeless mathematician taught me the true meaning of success

      Tariq Shaheed, DO | Physician
    • Registered dietitians on your care team [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • ER threats aren’t rare anymore—they’re routine

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • JFK warned us about physical fitness. Sixty years later, we’re still not listening.

      Alexandre Bourcier, MD | Conditions
    • The silent threat in health care layoffs

      Todd Thorsen, MBA | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Do Jewish students face rising bias in holistic admissions?

      Anonymous | Education
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • How a homeless mathematician taught me the true meaning of success

      Tariq Shaheed, DO | Physician
    • Registered dietitians on your care team [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • ER threats aren’t rare anymore—they’re routine

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • JFK warned us about physical fitness. Sixty years later, we’re still not listening.

      Alexandre Bourcier, MD | Conditions
    • The silent threat in health care layoffs

      Todd Thorsen, MBA | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...