Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
May 31, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

Risk management has been around for centuries. In ancient times, there were oracles and soothsayers. In the 1950s, risk management became a science. Nevertheless, 75 years later, a medical malpractice lawsuit is still a problem. An unknown number of claims are reviewed by lawyers, but 85,000 lawsuits are represented. Of these, 66.6 percent are frivolous.

It stands to reason that many meritorious cases are reviewed but are never represented. There are 343.6 million Americans, and each stands a 0.025 percent chance per year of being a claimant in a medical malpractice lawsuit. There are 1 million doctors, and each has an 8.5 percent chance per year of being a defendant, which is 340 percent higher. Each lawsuit costs about $654,000.

Medical errors occur during medical interventions. So do random errors of nature. Unfortunately, a random error of nature is clinically indistinguishable from a medical error. For claimants, this is why complications incite suspicions of medical malpractice.

For risk managers, one would think that, because of its evolution over the years into a science, risk management would have impacted medical malpractice. It does not take an oracle or soothsayer to know that any complication, whether from a random error of nature or a medical error, needs to be regarded as a potential medical malpractice lawsuit.

As long as there is a settlement value, plaintiff attorneys could not care less if a complication is an error of nature. This is how they make their money. Neither could defense attorneys. They are paid by malpractice carriers—win, lose, or draw.

Medical experts are retained by both. As long as they are paid for their opinions, they could not care less for whom they opine.

For malpractice carriers, as long as the claims-to-premium ratio keeps them solvent, they, too, could not care less if a claim has no merit.

The health care system is horizontally integrated networks of hospitals, medical institutions, and physician groups. Some networks are self-insured rather than traditionally insured. When a malpractice lawsuit is filed, not only is the network a codefendant as a matter of agency law, but, if self-insured, the network is also the insurance carrier.

The prime objective of the network is cost-effective health care. These networks often require adherence to “resource-based practice guidelines,” also known as “best practices.” A practice guideline is not a standard of care. It is, essentially, a shortcut of the standard of care designed to lower costs. As long as care is cost-effective, networks could not care less if a best practice is a standard of care. Neither could they care less if practitioners are more vulnerable because, as a condition of employment, practitioners comply with “best practices.”

Practitioners have the most skin in the game. They should care. Although usually the first to know of an unfortunate result, they take no action until they are served. Even then, they accede to the interests of defense attorneys, who are paid by malpractice carriers; malpractice carriers, who are paid by networks; and networks, which employ them and pay their premiums. As long as their premium is paid, they could not care less if a complication is an error of nature.

Ultimately, when a culture develops in which there is greater emphasis placed on cost than on quality, a disproportionate number of medical malpractice claims have no merit, and many that do have no representation.

The instinct should be advocacy for the standard of care. Evidence that casts doubt on an allegation of negligence only requires 50 percent plus a scintilla of probability that a complication is an error of nature rather than a medical error. Although a medical error is clinically indistinguishable from an error of nature, there is a distinct characteristic that transcends the clinical. Any complication following a medical intervention, on which this characteristic is, or is not, found, is enough evidence to prove—or to cast doubt on—whether the medical intervention is the same as the standard of care.

The trend, however, is to forego advocacy so as not to jeopardize a network. After all, advocacy asserts competence. Competence points to practice guidelines as departing from standards of care. Accordingly, JAMA recently redefined practice guidelines. In its opinion, the evidence upon which practice guidelines are based is competence. What must they be thinking? This is a complete fallacy; practice guidelines are called “resource based” because they are based on cost. The standard of care is based on competence.

ADVERTISEMENT

In what possible universe would even an oracle or soothsayer in ancient times advise, “A conflict is coming; you must do nothing to protect yourself”? Yet, this is exactly what the AMA has done for us.

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]

May 30, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

May 31, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • How doctors can stop frivolous lawsuits before they start

    Howard Smith, MD
  • How physicians can reclaim control over medical malpractice risks

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The hidden cost of malpractice: Why doctors are losing control

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Medical errors? Sorry, not sorry.

    Iris Kulbatski, PhD
  • Medical malpractice is a lot like running a marathon

    Christine Zharova, Esq
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • The criminalization of true medical errors is a step backwards for patient safety

    Michael Ramsay, MD
  • Medical malpractice: Don’t let the minority define us

    Shah-Naz H. Khan, MD
  • Medical school gap year: Why working as a medical assistant is perfect

    Natalie Enyedi

More in Physician

  • Mastering medical presentations: Elevating your impact

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • Marketing as a clinician isn’t about selling. It’s about trust.

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • How doctors took back control from hospital executives

    Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD
  • How art and science fueled one woman’s path to medicine

    Amy Avakian, MD
  • In a fractured world, Brian Wilson’s message still heals

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Why being a physician mom is harder than anyone admits

    Cynthia Chen-Joea, DO, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why what doctors say matters more than you think [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How Mark Twain would dismantle today’s flawed medical AI

      Neil Baum, MD and Mark Ibsen, MD | Tech
    • Mastering medical presentations: Elevating your impact

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Marketing as a clinician isn’t about selling. It’s about trust.

      Kara Pepper, MD | Physician
    • Graduating from medical school without family: a story of strength and survival

      Anonymous | Education
    • Inside human trafficking: a guide to recognizing and preventing it [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why what doctors say matters more than you think [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How Mark Twain would dismantle today’s flawed medical AI

      Neil Baum, MD and Mark Ibsen, MD | Tech
    • Mastering medical presentations: Elevating your impact

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Marketing as a clinician isn’t about selling. It’s about trust.

      Kara Pepper, MD | Physician
    • Graduating from medical school without family: a story of strength and survival

      Anonymous | Education
    • Inside human trafficking: a guide to recognizing and preventing it [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...