Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The NIH is under fire: Why public trust in science is fading

Dalia Saha, MD
Physician
March 10, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

Many moons ago, I worked in a forensics lab for a pair of professors who were husband and wife—a chemistry dynamic duo. I had a wonderful time in bench research, learning about different explosives and even doing site visits in Los Alamos, where many of the greatest scientific minds came together to help the U.S. win the war against the Axis powers during World War II. It was a surreal experience, but it was a lasting moment for me because I finally understood that research had a purpose and could really impact society in such an altering and significant manner through sheer determination, genius, hard work, and dedication. The creation of the nuclear weapon was a turning point, made possible once the ability to split the atom was harnessed. The driving force behind the work was a rallying cry for humanity—desperate to end conflict and suffering before all of mankind wiped each other out. The dropping of two nuclear bombs marked the culmination of extensive studying, trial and error, and countless failures until the result was found, replenished, and replicated. The funding provided to scientists like Einstein and Oppenheimer, among others, was given in good faith, hoping that meaningful discoveries would be made. Research had a clearer path of focus, and while the consequences of these discoveries were unclear, the outcome gave rise to an entirely new industry of discovery and engineering, leading to a modern way of life.

Afterward, my interest in the pursuit of translational research grew. I had the opportunity to explore further at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during my time as a medical student on two separate occasions. It was a very enlightening and invigorating environment but also very stressful. The academic purity was the focus, and I witnessed some of the most intellectual conversations I had ever experienced, along with the joy of learning, reading, and applying new concepts. I was in sheer awe of the brilliance of being surrounded by so many incredible minds. However, the darker side of this environment was also present. One of my principal investigators demanded that everyone work every day, including weekends, because true scientists never took days off. The reality, however, was that he was afraid of losing his lab and the funding for it. Getting published was another major source of pressure, and it placed tremendous strain on students and staff to ensure that experiments went smoothly. Staff meetings often became sources of anxiety and occasionally led to berating and humiliation—again, all in the name of science.

Despite being at the forefront of scientific and medical research, the NIH and its government funding have seen a decline in public sentiment. The push for defunding has become a central focus for our country’s leadership, as they aim to reduce government spending by eliminating wasteful expenditures. Herein lies the rub: How much of the research being performed is truly impactful? By objective measures, very little research is making a tangible impact on humanity. Most papers and discoveries will not lead to groundbreaking changes in science or medicine. In fact, some of the most brilliant discoveries, such as those by Isaac Newton and Alexander Fleming, were happy accidents discovered by astute individuals able to recognize patterns. Modern science and medicine have become an industry in itself, often leading to redundancy. Still, it remains something that distinguishes the U.S. from many other countries in its ability to devise new treatments that are potentially curative and cutting-edge. If we start to lose this edge by reducing funding and resources, we may see the effects down the road, with other countries emerging as leaders in scientific discovery and patient care, potentially impacting global health care.

The public opinion of the NIH has also shifted in recent years, particularly during the pandemic. The controversy over the coronavirus vaccine and the NIH’s role in its development has led to a growing distrust among the public. While some jurisdictions have taken steps to halt the defunding of the NIH and its programs, a larger effort is needed to rehabilitate the image of the NIH, to better explain its origins, its purpose, and its vital role in advancing health and science.

The NIH was founded in 1887 as a small laboratory within the U.S. Public Health Service and has since evolved into the nation’s leading medical research agency. Its mission is to improve public health by conducting and supporting medical research, with a focus on understanding human health and diseases. Over the years, the NIH has grown into a network of 27 institutes and centers, supporting a broad range of research that spans from basic science to clinical trials. The NIH not only funds external research but also conducts its own groundbreaking studies, contributing to the development of treatments and cures for diseases like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, as well as addressing emerging health threats such as infectious diseases and mental health disorders. Today, the NIH is an essential part of the nation’s health infrastructure, helping to advance medical knowledge and improve the health of the global population.

If efforts are not made to change the public’s perception of the NIH and its mission, the attempts to corral spending and focus on harnessing resources may ultimately be in vain. The future of innovation and scientific discovery may rest on our ability to reinvigorate public trust in the value of research and its far-reaching impact.

Dalia Saha is a nocturnist.

Prev

How data accuracy failures are costing lives and money in health care

March 10, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Improving type 1 diabetes screening awareness among women [PODCAST]

March 10, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How data accuracy failures are costing lives and money in health care
Next Post >
Improving type 1 diabetes screening awareness among women [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Dalia Saha, MD

  • What worries this physician about the COVID-19 vaccine

    Dalia Saha, MD

Related Posts

  • Our public health efforts depend on flexibility and trust

    John Connolly
  • The Supreme Court must consider science, not pseudo-science, in public health rulings

    Jack Resneck, Jr., MD
  • Take politics out of science and medicine

    Anonymous
  • COVID-19: Here’s how to gain the public’s trust

    Cullen M. Lilley
  • Does the FDA approval of aducanumab mark the return of science-based medicine?

    Robert Trent
  • Street medicine: a lifeline for Florida’s homeless amidst new public sleeping ban

    Jennifer Caputo-Seidler, MD

More in Physician

  • Why more doctors are choosing direct care over traditional health care

    Grace Torres-Hodges, DPM, MBA
  • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

    Neil Baum, MD
  • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

    Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD
  • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Why listening to parents’ intuition can save lives in pediatric care

    Tokunbo Akande, MD, MPH
  • Finding balance and meaning in medical practice: a holistic approach to professional fulfillment

    Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The NIH is under fire: Why public trust in science is fading
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...