Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why a fourth year will not fix emergency medicine’s real problems

Anna Heffron, MD, PhD & Polly Wiltz, DO
Education
May 21, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

The field of emergency medicine (EM) is at a crossroads. Faced with rising burnout, a constantly changing health care landscape, and an evolving trend in unfilled residency positions, the specialty is now grappling with another proposed structural change: A proposed mandatory fourth year. While the idea has been periodically debated over the past two decades, it gained new momentum with proposed changes to the ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Emergency Medicine (EM), including a mandatory 48-month curriculum. EM training should be held to a high standard, but a fourth year of training is unlikely to address the true challenges in our field and may ultimately cause more harm than good.

No evidence of superior outcomes with four-year programs

There is no evidence that graduates of four-year EM residency programs perform better clinically, have improved board pass rates, or achieve better long-term career satisfaction compared to their peers trained in three-year programs. On the contrary, a 2021 study in Western Journal of Emergency Medicine found no statistically significant differences in ABEM board pass rates between three- and four-year program graduates. Similarly, research has shown no consistent outcome advantages in patient care, patient outcomes, procedural competency, or job placement between the two tracks.

Emergency medicine’s broad scope and intensity may tempt stakeholders to “add time” as a catch-all solution to perceived deficiencies, but time alone is not a substitute for targeted curriculum reform. The ACGME has offered no evidence to suggest four-year graduates are better prepared than three-year graduates. In contrast, a 2023 study by the American Board of Emergency Medicine showed graduates of three-year programs actually have a slightly higher board pass rate than graduates of four-year programs. Citing an overall downtrend in board pass rates as a reason to lengthen training is incongruent with the available evidence and will not help identify or solve the real underlying reasons for this change.

Economic and workforce consequences

Expanding residency by an additional year imposes real financial costs — to trainees and the health care system alike. Graduating medical students in 2023 reported median debt loads of approximately $202,000 (AAMC). An extra year of residency translates into delayed earning potential, postponed retirement contributions, and another year of earning a resident’s salary — typically under $70,000. For many, this is an unsustainable proposition.

On a national scale, increasing training time could exacerbate workforce strain, particularly in rural and underserved regions. Though some projections forecast a surplus of emergency physicians by 2030, these models fail to account for persistent geographic maldistribution and the uneven closure of rural emergency departments. Delaying the pipeline of board-certified emergency physicians by a year will not solve these disparities — and may widen them.

A risk to recruitment in a match in recovery

Perhaps most concerning is the potential deterrent effect on future applicants. According to the 2025 National Residency Match, emergency medicine saw substantial improvement in filling EM programs across the country, with only 65 positions going unfilled, achieving a 97.9 percent fill rate (NRMP). This paints a stark contrast to the 2023 Match, where emergency medicine positions went unfilled at an unprecedented rate, with 555 unfilled slots in the initial match, demonstrating that EM’s performance this year is on track to return to the pre-COVID fill rate of 99 percent.

Though multifactorial, this is an optimistic trend reflecting that EM may once again attract a robust applicant pool.

Mandating a fourth year may further dissuade competitive medical students from applying. In an era where students weigh specialty choice alongside debt burden, length of training, and perceived future stability, an additional year may serve as a barrier rather than a benefit. Further, mandating a fourth year may drive some individuals with particularly high debt burdens or familial or health constraints away from applying into emergency medicine — further exacerbating the gap between EM physician need and supply and depriving our field of some outstanding potential candidates.

Focus on the right problems

Emergency medicine does not need a longer training pathway. It needs better post-residency practice conditions, more support for new graduates, and a renewed commitment to addressing burnout and moral injury at their root causes. The call for a mandatory four-year residency may be well-intentioned, but it diverts attention from the urgent reforms that could make a far greater impact. If the goal is to strengthen the specialty, let us focus on what we can improve within training — not artificially extending it.

Polly Wiltz and Anna Heffron are emergency medicine residents.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

May 21, 2025 Kevin 1
…
Next

Antimicrobial resistance: a public health crisis that needs your voice [PODCAST]

May 21, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Emergency Medicine

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails
Next Post >
Antimicrobial resistance: a public health crisis that needs your voice [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Anna Heffron, MD, PhD & Polly Wiltz, DO

  • Stigma and stereotypes have no place in medicine

    Polly Wiltz, DO

Related Posts

  • From online education to frontline medicine

    Diana Ioana Rapolti, Deepika Khanna, Vivian Jin, and Shikha Jain, MD
  • Medicine won’t keep you warm at night

    Anonymous
  • Delivering unpalatable truths in medicine

    Samantha Cheng
  • Trauma: Encountering the past in the present

    Anonymous
  • What medicine can learn from a poem

    Thomas L. Amburn
  • The climate crisis as viewed by an emergency physician

    Elizabeth M. Barreras-Rivest, MD

More in Education

  • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

    Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA
  • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

    Vaishali Jha
  • Residency match tips: Building mentorship, research, and community

    Simran Kaur, MD and Eva Shelton, MD
  • How I learned to stop worrying and love AI

    Rajeev Dutta
  • Why medical student debt is killing primary care in America

    Alexander Camp
  • Why the pre-med path is pushing future doctors to the brink

    Jordan Williamson, MEd
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • Why perinatal mental health is the top cause of maternal death in the U.S.

      Sheila Noon | Conditions
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How the 10th Apple Effect is stealing your joy in medicine

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • Why perinatal mental health is the top cause of maternal death in the U.S.

      Sheila Noon | Conditions
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How the 10th Apple Effect is stealing your joy in medicine

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...