Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

Howard Smith, MD
Physician
May 6, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

Doctors are plagued by medical malpractice lawsuits. Every year, there are 85,000 lawsuits filed, of which 66.6 percent are frivolous. Each doctor has an 8.5 percent chance per year of being sued.

In the course of my efforts to make a difference, I personally contact 50 of the nation’s most prestigious medical malpractice law firms, both plaintiff and defense firms. I make it known that I developed a risk management process and that I would like to explore the possibility of collaborating with them in some capacity.

Most of these firms represent themselves as having years of experience in medical malpractice litigation. In fact, collectively, they represent over 2,000 years of experience and expertise. Collectively, they all retain thousands of qualified, preeminent, board-certified medical expert witnesses in virtually every medical specialty and subspecialty; in fact, they each have a stable full of them, and many are redundant.

Defense firms acquire cases from malpractice insurance companies, with which they do business, and are paid billable hours. They always get paid.

Plaintiff firms seek out clients and are paid a contingency fee. Some plaintiff firms unabashedly claim millions of dollars of settlements and verdicts on their websites. They advertise, “If we don’t win, you don’t pay.”

In my contact with both, I ask one question, which I would expect any attorney to be able to answer and which is never addressed on any of their websites: “What do expert witnesses, who they retain, do, which sets them apart from other medical experts?” By this question, I do not mean “what do medical experts do?” I know what they do. At best, medical experts are nonpartisan. At worst, they are “hired guns.”

I express that, in my humble opinion, because all medical experts are scientists, they should do what scientists do, not what lawyers who hire them tell them to do. According to Dr. Paul Brouardel, the father of forensic science, “If the law has made you a witness, remain a man of science … bear testimony within the limits of science.” Bearing witness within the limits of science follows four general principles.

1. Because the standard of care is the benchmark for competence, it stands to reason that any associated complication is a random error of nature and not an actionable medical error. This acknowledges that there are no medical errors with excellence, and random errors of nature “just happen.” Even standards of care are not immune to one.

2. Medical interventions should be facsimiles of standards of care. Both are separated into 10 counterpart phases; each phase represents a particular duty. Depending on circumstances, it stands to reason that a difference between the standard of care and the medical intervention does not necessarily represent a breach of duty. Sometimes, a “calculated risk” is necessary and a risk/benefit ratio needs to be objectively considered in this determination.

3. Because of the quantitative nature of the risk/benefit ratio, when the standard of care is compared to the medical intervention in a systematic way, the two are either the same or are different. Differences between a phase in the standard of care and the corresponding phase of the medical intervention are objective, quantitative, and measurable. Even when there is a difference, it stands to reason that, by following a properly executed calculated risk, the medical intervention is not a breach of duty. There may be a difference from the standard of care, but the difference is not statistically significant. Any complication that follows is an error of nature until proven otherwise.

4. “Until proven otherwise” is proving statistical significance. These differences from the standard of care represent the medical intervention. There is a sample of 10 quantitative measures. The sample is scrutinized using statistical analysis. If there is a statistical difference, there is a medical error, and the medical intervention departs from the standard of care. If there is no statistical difference, the opposite is true. The burden of proof corresponds to 50 percent probability plus a scintilla. Scintilla has a discretionary value. In statistical analysis, scintilla is 45 percent. Hence, the level of confidence is 95 percent, which is “the sine qua non” of science.

Understanding that this is what a medical expert, who is a scientist, should do, I ask: “Can any one of the hundreds, if not thousands, of medical experts, who these attorneys retain, differentiate a medical error from a random error of nature with this same competence?”

I go on to explain that I doubt so. I, alone, adapt the scientific method and I make this distinction. My protocol is peer reviewed. Even though their medical experts are not able to make this distinction, I am willing to share my protocol.

ADVERTISEMENT

If I spark just a scintilla of intellectual curiosity, any one of these attorneys should want to discuss this further to explore the possibility of promoting my protocol to their medical experts. It only takes a phone call, and they all have my contact information.

After three months, not a single law firm, who I contact, responds. Interpret this as you may, but to me it speaks volumes. What underlies their silence remains to be seen, but these attorneys, regardless of the side they represent, could not care less about the merit of a case. This is pathetic.

Howard Smith is an obstetrics-gynecology physician.

Prev

Avoiding leadership pitfalls: strategies for success in health care [PODCAST]

May 5, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

America, our health care workforce training isn’t evolving alongside our needs

May 6, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Avoiding leadership pitfalls: strategies for success in health care [PODCAST]
Next Post >
America, our health care workforce training isn’t evolving alongside our needs

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Howard Smith, MD

  • The shocking silence of top law firms on frivolous medical lawsuits

    Howard Smith, MD
  • The medical malpractice system is broken: Who really benefits?

    Howard Smith, MD
  • How to hold ambulance chasers and hired guns accountable for frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits at little to no cost

    Howard Smith, MD

Related Posts

  • Medical malpractice is a lot like running a marathon

    Christine Zharova, Esq
  • Medical malpractice: Don’t let the minority define us

    Shah-Naz H. Khan, MD
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • Medical school gap year: Why working as a medical assistant is perfect

    Natalie Enyedi
  • End medical school grades

    Adam Lieber
  • Navigating mental health challenges in medical education

    Carter Do

More in Physician

  • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

    Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD
  • What independent and locum tenens doctors need to know about fair market value

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • How one simple breakfast question can transform patient care

    Dr. Damane Zehra
  • Nurses are the backbone of medicine—and they deserve better

    Matthew Moeller, MD
  • How to change the world: Start by making your bed

    Neil Baum, MD
  • From rejection to resilience: my journey through emergency medicine residency

    Dr. Syed Hasan
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When doctors die in silence: Confronting the epidemic of violence against physicians

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Doctors speak out: Why we’re saying no to burnout

      Aisha Quarles, MD | Physician
    • Avoiding leadership pitfalls: strategies for success in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How to build a culture where physicians feel valued [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • In the absence of physician mentorship, who will train the next generation of primary care clinicians?

      Kenneth Botelho, DMSc, PA-C | Education
    • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

      Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD | Physician
    • What independent and locum tenens doctors need to know about fair market value

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Physician
    • Health care’s data problem: the real obstacle to AI success

      Jay Anders, MD | Tech
    • What ChatGPT’s tone reveals about our cultural values

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When doctors die in silence: Confronting the epidemic of violence against physicians

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Doctors speak out: Why we’re saying no to burnout

      Aisha Quarles, MD | Physician
    • Avoiding leadership pitfalls: strategies for success in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How to build a culture where physicians feel valued [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • In the absence of physician mentorship, who will train the next generation of primary care clinicians?

      Kenneth Botelho, DMSc, PA-C | Education
    • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

      Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD | Physician
    • What independent and locum tenens doctors need to know about fair market value

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Physician
    • Health care’s data problem: the real obstacle to AI success

      Jay Anders, MD | Tech
    • What ChatGPT’s tone reveals about our cultural values

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...