She did not begin with the abuse; she began with sleep.

“I do not know why the news is bothering me so much,” she said. “I cannot turn it off. I feel on edge all the time.”

She was in her late 50s, successful, articulate, and with no prior trauma history documented in her chart. She insisted she was not “overreacting,” just “sensitive to injustice.” At the time, headlines were saturated with renewed coverage of the case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Cable news panels dissected power, corruption, and institutional failure. Social media amplified every detail. She was not watching for politics; she was watching because it felt familiar.

It took three visits before she said it plainly: “When I was 16…”

The mechanism of reactivation

Public scandals involving sexual abuse do not simply inform the public; they reactivate private trauma. Physicians need to be prepared for that. Sexual abuse often goes undisclosed for years, sometimes decades. Shame, fear, family dynamics, and power differentials silence survivors. Many never planned to speak about it. Some believed they never would. But headlines can loosen what was tightly sealed.

Media coverage of high-profile abuse cases often reawakens memories long compartmentalized, anger toward institutions that failed them, distrust in authority, and feelings of invisibility and disbelief. What looks like “news fatigue” may in fact be trauma activation, and the patient may not consciously make the connection.

Disclosures rarely begin with “I was abused.” They present as insomnia, irritability, increased alcohol use, panic symptoms, somatic complaints, or a vague sense of destabilization tied to “current events.” Sometimes the patient appears embarrassed by their own reaction. “I do not know why this is hitting me so hard.” That is the opening.

The physician’s role

Well-meaning physicians sometimes miss it. We redirect the conversation to politics. We minimize the reaction. We move quickly into medication adjustments. We ask investigative questions rather than supportive ones. When a patient tentatively references emotional distress related to abuse headlines, they are not asking for a legal analysis; they are testing whether it is safe to speak. If we move too quickly, the door closes.

The most therapeutic responses are often simple:

“I am noticing this is affecting you deeply.”
“Sometimes stories like this bring up personal experiences.”
“If anything like that has touched your life, we can talk about it here.”

And if disclosure follows:

“I am really glad you told me.”
“I believe you.”
“That should not have happened to you.”

Physicians are not investigators; we are witnesses. Belief and calm presence often matter more than perfectly structured interventions in the initial moment. High-profile abuse cases frequently involve powerful individuals and systemic failure. For survivors, this reinforces a painful narrative: People in authority do not protect the vulnerable.

Anger and addiction as shields

When patients express anger toward institutions, our role is not to debate their perception. It is to understand what that anger represents. Anger often protects something more fragile underneath: shame, grief, helplessness. Anger and compassion cannot share the same space at the same time. Our task is to hold compassion steady until the patient can access it safely.

In addiction medicine, this pattern is familiar. Trauma resurfaces, and substance use increases, not because patients lack willpower, but because alcohol or drugs once served as anesthesia. When public narratives reopen trauma, relapse risk rises. Primary care physicians, psychiatrists, and specialists alike should remain attentive to subtle increases in use during periods of intense media exposure. A relapse during such periods may not be about the present. It may be about something long past.

Creating safety and containment

We do not need to turn a routine visit into a full therapy session. What patients need most in these moments is containment: eye contact, steady tone, nonjudgmental curiosity, and clear boundaries. “This sounds important,” you might say. “We can spend a few minutes now, and if you would like, we can schedule time to explore it further.” Containment communicates safety without overwhelm. Patients often fear losing control if they begin speaking. Our steadiness becomes regulating.

We cannot control the news cycle. We cannot undo institutional failures. We cannot resolve public outrage. But we can control how we respond when a patient hesitates before finishing a sentence. Sexual abuse does not begin with headlines, but headlines can unseal what was buried. As physicians, we are often the first authority figure to respond differently than those who failed them before.

When a patient says, “I do not know why this is bothering me so much,” they may be asking a deeper question: “Is it finally safe to tell the truth?”

Our answer must be steady. Yes. It is safe here.

Barbara Sparacino is a triple board-certified physician in adult and geriatric psychiatry and addiction medicine, and the founder of The Aging Parent Coach. With over fifteen years of clinical experience, she empowers adult children to navigate the emotional, legal, and caregiving complexities that arise when supporting aging parents. Her expert insights have been featured by major outlets, including NBC, Fox News, CBS, Apple News+, Style, Care.com, and Next Avenue.

Through her signature program, The Aging Parent Plan, Dr. Sparacino helps families make confident, values-based decisions about care while preserving their own mental and emotional well-being. She continues to practice psychiatry and teach through her work with the University of Miami and the Veterans Health Administration, advocating for a compassionate, evidence-informed approach to aging and mental health.

Follow her on Instagram, TikTok, or visit The Aging Parent Coach to learn more.