A recent Washington Post article called for earlier detection of atherosclerosis and a shift from “ischemia-centric” thinking to an “atheroma-centric” model. That’s progress, but it’s still missing the most important piece: Plaque isn’t the root cause.

For 50 years, we’ve built a trillion-dollar cardiology machine around the cholesterol hypothesis. Statins, PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, inclisiran, Lp(a) drugs, all circling the same biochemical drain. LDL plays a role, yes. But LDL is …

Read more…

When I tell colleagues that I offer Valtrex (valacyclovir) and low-dose lithium orotate to patients worried about developing Alzheimer’s, the silence in the room thickens. Someone always asks, “Where’s the randomized controlled trial?” That’s exactly the problem. We keep waiting for perfect evidence while the disease eats away at people’s brains.

I’m an internist and lipidologist who’s spent years watching the medical establishment chase the wrong villains, like cholesterol, salt, …

Read more…

When the FOURIER trial was published in 2017, cardiologists and lipidologists everywhere hailed it as proof that lowering LDL with PCSK9 inhibitors “saves lives.” But when you actually read the data, not the press releases, it’s hard not to shake your head.

Over a median of 2.2 years, evolocumab (Repatha) reduced nonfatal heart attacks by about 0.9 percent and had no significant impact on death. The absolute risk reduction for all-cause …

Read more…

A brilliant, like-minded cardiologist recently shared with me “A Reappraisal of the Lipid Hypothesis” by Dr. Robert DuBroff, published in The American Journal of Medicine. It should be required reading for every physician who has ever written “continue statin” without a second thought.

DuBroff’s analysis reviewed 29 randomized controlled trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy conducted after modern trial regulations were adopted. The results were quietly devastating:

• Only two of 29 trials …

  Read more…