Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How the IPAB takes policy and puts it in the hands of health care experts

Shadowfax, MD
Policy
April 29, 2011
Share
Tweet
Share

Everyone knows that the excess growth in health care costs is driving the fiscal crisis in our country.

The problem is that while everybody wants to somehow cut the cost of Medicare/Medicaid, in theory, when it comes time to actually make cuts, the courage of our politicians fails in the face of unrelenting public opposition to cuts in Medicare.

In a recent poll, the Washington Post found that a staggering 78% of respondents opposed cuts to Medicare, 65% strongly. Surprisingly, despite the fact that it’s a “welfare” program with limited constituency, 69% opposed cuts in Medicaid. And this is despite the fact that the poll question was slightly loaded, phrased to trigger the respondents’ awareness of the national debt. Gallup found that even of Republicans, only 14% favored an overhaul of these popular entitlement programs, and 61% favored either no change or minor changes.

So while we all see the train heading off the cliff, we all know that something needs to be done, it’s hard and politically scary to tinker or roll back such popular programs. You can see that with the fact that Obama’s HHS has granted hundreds of “Quality Bonus” payments to the Medicare Advantage plans that he opposes. And now some in Congress are trying to roll back the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that was included in the PPACA.

This is disheartening, especially in light of the fact that the critics of ObamaCare are those who often complain that it does to little to contain costs. Yet they are trying to repeal what is probably the single most effective cost-control provision in the health care reform. Apparently it’s “rationing” or possibly a “death panel.”

I should explain what the IPAB is, before I go any further. Established in the PPACA, it grew out of the MedPAC, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. MedPAC made recommendations to Congress regarding what services Medicare should pay for, and how much it should pay. However, Congress often (read: usually) ignored those recommendations, especially for medical devices or other services with well-connected lobbyists, and MedPAC has been a very weak influence on controlling the growth in Medicare expenditures. IPAB is a bit different. It will consist of 15 appointed members who are to be experts in health care, economics, research and insurance. Some, but no more than half, are to be health care providers. The president is to consult with Congressional leaders before appointing them, and the chair will have to face Senate confirmation.

The IPAB will have powers more expansive than MedPAC. If HHS determines that the growth of medicare is expected to exceed a certain index (inflation-based till 2020, GDP-based after that), the IPAB is required to submit a plan which would restrict that growth by a certain percent.

IPAB is explicitly prohibited from making any recommendation that would ration care, raise out-of-pocket expenses from beneficiaries, or restrict eligibility in Medicare. It also cannot reduce hospital reimbursement rates till 2020. Any recommendation IPAB makes will become law (or, technically, a rule) unless Congress acts to replace that recommendation with one which can save as much money. Congress may, with 60 votes in the Senate, choose to block the IPAB recommendations altogether. (Interestingly, 60 votes are also required to repeal or disband IPAB.)

This body was created basically because Congress failed to act, and shows every likelihood of continuing that gridlock on the hot-button item of health care cost control. And when Congress has in the past tried to put health care cost controls into law, it hasn’t worked out so well. (See: SGR) So the PPACA took the initiative away from Congress and creates a dynamic in which health care experts, including doctors, will be making recommendations that will automatically go into effect. This takes the “default” mode from “nothing happens” to policy changes which will happen unless Congress can rouse itself to block them. Is that a possibility? Sure! (See again: SGR) Will it happen routinely, if the rules proposed are limited in scope and well-targeted? Hard to say. We won’t know that until IPAB is actually constituted and has made some recommendations. There are as yet no appointees.

The advantage of this is that it takes policy and puts it into the hands of actual health-care experts, including doctors and nurses, patient advocates, and other industry experts, instead of our venal and corrupt politicians. The disadvantage of this is that it takes policy and puts it into the hands of unaccountable bureaucrats instead of our democratically-elected representatives. In the end, I think this is a good thing. Something need to change. Costs need to be controlled. Congress does not seem able to manage this problem. Peter Orszag described the IPAB as “the largest yielding of sovereignty from the Congress since the creation of the Federal Reserve.” That was in praise of the IPAB, by the way.

So why is the IPAB being opposed in Congress now? I think there are a variety of reasons. Some legislators may be regretting the cessation of that power to an outside agency. The GOP has a vested interest in opposing everything about ObamaCare, both ideologically and electorally. And Republicans have never been comfortable with bureaucrat-run, centralized decision-making bodied in the first place. There are electoral advantages to members of both parties in posing as defenders of Medicare. Some of both parties may be influenced by the financial support of the health care industry. (Industry sources have a vested interest in health care costs not being controlled — remember that one man’s waste and abuse is another’s paycheck.)

In the end, I think Congress will leave the IPAB alone, and they’ll be glad they did. When the time comes for the cuts we all know are needed, IPAB can do the hard work and the politicians won’t have to get any blood on their hands. They can decry the cuts as misguided and lament their inability to block them. Everybody gets to evade responsibility, and the policy can actually be set by experts. Whether they will get it right, or whether they will have the scope of authority to bend the curve of health care costs is at this point still an unknown. But changes are needed, and at this time the IPAB is the only credible mechanism we have in place or under consideration.

“Shadowfax” is an emergency physician who blogs at Movin’ Meat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

Prev

Doctors find incentives elusive for meaningful use of electronic records

April 29, 2011 Kevin 5
…
Next

The war on pubic hair must end

April 29, 2011 Kevin 32
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Doctors find incentives elusive for meaningful use of electronic records
Next Post >
The war on pubic hair must end

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Shadowfax, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The SGR is dead! Hooray?

    Shadowfax, MD
  • Don’t pay specialists for being on call. Here’s why.

    Shadowfax, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The truth about admissions from the emergency department

    Shadowfax, MD

More in Policy

  • How the One Big Beautiful Bill could reshape your medical career

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • Why the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is essential to saving lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Brooklyn hepatitis C cluster reveals hidden dangers in outpatient clinics

    Don Weiss, MD, MPH
  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Innovation is moving too fast for health care workers to catch up

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How pediatricians can address the health problems raised in the MAHA child health report

    Joseph Barrocas, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Could ECMO change where we die and how our organs are donated?

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Could ECMO change where we die and how our organs are donated?

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Conditions
    • Every medication error is a system failure, not a personal flaw

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Meds
    • From Civil War tales to iPhones: a family history in contrast

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Reframing self-care as required maintenance for physicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden dangers of over-the-counter weight-loss supplements

      STRIPED, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health | Conditions
    • Implementing value-based telehealth pain management and substance misuse therapy service

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Could ECMO change where we die and how our organs are donated?

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Could ECMO change where we die and how our organs are donated?

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Conditions
    • Every medication error is a system failure, not a personal flaw

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Meds
    • From Civil War tales to iPhones: a family history in contrast

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Reframing self-care as required maintenance for physicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden dangers of over-the-counter weight-loss supplements

      STRIPED, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health | Conditions
    • Implementing value-based telehealth pain management and substance misuse therapy service

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How the IPAB takes policy and puts it in the hands of health care experts
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...