Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Medicare patients should care about the way we pay providers

Kavita Patel, MD
Policy
March 6, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

shutterstock_86514196

It can be difficult to keep up with the jargon, countless proposals and complicated policies that surround the debate over Medicare reform.  Whether you are discussing premium support, changing the eligibility age or Medicare for All, there is one relatively simple concept that patients should make a point to pay attention to – one that directly impacts them – and is the cornerstone of the debate.  This concept has to do with the way Medicare currently pays providers versus the way it should pay providers, and how each of these payment structures influences the practice of medicine.

As most readers are well aware, Medicare currently pays providers on a fee-for-service (FFS) basis, meaning for each individual service they render, providers receive a fixed fee.  Under this payment model providers are not only incentivized to provide more services, no matter their ultimate value to the patient, but their ability to innovate, coordinate across care settings and implement best practices is hindered.  For example, if a physician in Austin, Texas comes up with a creative way to care for her complex patients with chronic conditions (her “hotspotters”) and it ends up reducing high cost visits to the ER, hospital or specialty office, the physician is penalized in a FFS system- her productivity numbers might appear low and she receives less reimbursement. Alternatively, new payment models, many of which are currently being tested or already in place across both public and private sectors allow for doctors and other providers to creatively coordinate care and potentially share in some of the savings that would simply go back to the insurance company.   Additionally, bundled or episode-based payments for multiple services allow providers to work across different specialties and settings to achieve higher quality at a lower cost.

In addition to restructuring the payment system to promote coordination of care, we must also encourage a broader definition of what constitutes care that is worthy of reimbursement.  Many innovative approaches that are adaptive to patient needs and modern demands, such as email or video consultations, co-location of behavioral health and primary care, comprehensive treatment plan development and tracking, and end-of-life counseling are often not reimbursed because it is hard to apply a dollar amount, or a “fee,” for their value.  In the case of Medicare, we have an evaluation and management code for Telephonic visits (99441-3) but rarely reimburse these visits.  Therefore, despite the fact that these practices are proven to improve the patient experience and potentially lower the cost of care, they remain uncompensated by FFS and thus sorely underused.

There are a great deal of promising pilots and efforts underway in Medicare such as the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (which allows multiple payers to come together and reimburse for population –based care as well as a number of Innovation Challenge Award winners who are introducing novel payment mechanisms.  But pilots and initiatives are not enough.

The current FFS reimbursement model is a big problem for providers who want to deliver the best care to their patients, but it is an even bigger problem for patients.  Patients deserve care that is personalized and works to meet their needs.  We are seeing recognition of the need for this type of care with the development of new models such as accountable care organizations, etc.- there have to be complementary payment models that reward the type of care they aim to provide.  This is precisely why the one-size-fits-all approach inherent to the FFS payment model is no longer viable.

Medicare patients may not realize this, but they should have a vested interest in seeing that Medicare move away from FFS to new payment mechanisms that allow providers the flexibility to innovate, not only because this will improve outcomes and better their health, but also because it will help reduce costs and sustain the program into the future.  Sustaining Medicare into the future will undoubtedly require that care be adaptive to patient needs and new demands associated with increased chronic conditions, an aging population and myriad other factors.  As a board member of the Partnership for the Future of Medicare, a bipartisan group dedicated to seeing that true, comprehensive Medicare reform is achieved, I am working with my colleagues to ensure that we begin the transition away from FFS Medicare and that these new payment models be brought to scale.

Kavita Patel is Managing Director for Clinical Transformation and Delivery, Brookings Institution, Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform. She could be reached on Twitter @kavitapmd.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Medical journals that accept stories and essays from physicians

March 6, 2013 Kevin 6
…
Next

Disclosure and offer: Who protects the patient's interests?

March 6, 2013 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Medicare, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Medical journals that accept stories and essays from physicians
Next Post >
Disclosure and offer: Who protects the patient's interests?

ADVERTISEMENT

More in Policy

  • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

    Joshua Vasquez, MD
  • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

    Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James
  • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

    Holland Haynie, MD
  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

      All Levels Leadership | Physician
    • Healing beyond the surface: Why proper chronic wound care matters

      Alvin May, MD | Conditions
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Dear July intern: It’s normal to feel clueless—here’s what matters

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Education
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 15 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

      All Levels Leadership | Physician
    • Healing beyond the surface: Why proper chronic wound care matters

      Alvin May, MD | Conditions
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Dear July intern: It’s normal to feel clueless—here’s what matters

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Education
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Medicare patients should care about the way we pay providers
15 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...