Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Mammograms in younger women: Is the data there?

Margaret Polaneczky, MD
Conditions
September 17, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

A recent study has concluded that women with breast cancer who failed to get annual mammograms are more likely to die from their disease than those who had annual mammograms, and argues that more frequent mammograms are warranted in women under age 40. Unfortunately, despite all the media attention this study is getting, I don’t think the researcher’s conclusions are supported by the study results.

The researchers did a retrospective medical record review on deaths that occurred among breast cancer patients identified from a cancer database at Massachusetts General or Brigham and Women’s Hospitals in Boston between 1990-1999 and followed until 2007. They call this a failure analysis:

Invasive breast cancer failure analysis defined 7301 patients between 1990 and 1999, with 1705 documented deaths from breast cancer (n = 609) or other causes (n = 905). Among 609 confirmed breast cancer deaths, 29% were among women who had been screened (19% screen-detected and 10% interval cancers), whereas 71% were among unscreened women, including > 2 years since last mammogram (6%), or never screened (65%). Overall, 29% of cancer deaths were screened, whereas 71% were unscreened. Median age at diagnosis of fatal cancers was 49 years; in deaths not from breast cancer, median age at diagnosis was 72 years

The authors concluded that because most deaths from breast cancer occur in unscreened women under age 50, initiation of regular mammograms before age 50 years should be encouraged.

Where this failure analysis fails

Despite its strongly worded conclusions, the study raises more questions than it answers, and has a number of severe limitations.

  • The entire analysis is conducted among women who died, either from breast cancer or from other causes. Since death from non-cancer causes is rare in women under age 50, and because they are less likely to die from other causes during follow up, breast cancer deaths will be over-represented in younger women in the sample. Older women not getting mammograms may be not getting screening because they are ill from other causes and are also more likely to die from these other causes during the follow up period, making breast cancer deaths less common in this group.  Who knows which way the data ultimately skewed, but regardless, it is skewing every which way as far as I’m concerned. All of which muddies the conclusions.
  •  The study fails to tell us what percent of women who did not die got annual vs not annual mammograms. This is akin to reporting that 80% of auto accident deaths occur among those who started their trip at home vs a public parking garage, without telling you what percentage of all car trips originate from home.
  • The study did not compare breast cancer treatments between women who died and those who did not die. The researchers just assumed that all women got standard of care at their medical center for their cancer. That’s a huge assumption to make without any proof.  It would have been actually quite easy to review a statistical sampling of charts to determine if this assumption were correct, but the researchers did not do this.
  • Women who don’t get regular mammograms may differ from those who do in other ways that increase the risk for death from breast cancer death, including low socioeconomic status, lack of health insurance. distrust of medical treatments, etc.
  • The researchers try to make the point that among those who died of their cancer, those who had nothad mammograms prior to diagnosis had later stage cancers. Given that this analysis was confined to patients died of their cancer, I’m not sure stage at diagnosis mattered.
  • The study was conducted at a Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital using records from their breast cancer registry. Both these hospitals are referral centers likely to attract younger women with more aggressive cancers for treatment, who may not be representative of the general population of women presenting for mammogram screening or who are diagnosed with breast cancer. Indeed, the study population was over 90% white and of high socioeconomic status, pretty standard for a referral population if I ever saw one.

One thing that is evident is that breast cancers in younger women tend to be more aggressive than those in older women, an idea that would support more aggressive screening in younger women since each life saved carries more years of life saved as well.

However, this is countermanded by the argument that  breast cancer, despite being more aggressive, occurs much less frequently in younger than older women. Add in that mammograms are much better at detecting slower growing, less fatal breast cancers than the more aggressive cancers, and that screening is less effective in younger women, and you have a sense of the screening conundrum we face for this cancer that claims so many women’s lives each year.

Unfortunately, this retrospective analysis is not going to solve the issue.

Margaret Polaneczky is an obstetrician-gynecologist who blogs at The Blog That Ate Manhattan.

Prev

The Affordable Care Act ignores simple issues of human nature

September 17, 2013 Kevin 59
…
Next

A gameplan against this year's flu

September 17, 2013 Kevin 4
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Radiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The Affordable Care Act ignores simple issues of human nature
Next Post >
A gameplan against this year's flu

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Margaret Polaneczky, MD

  • 7 ways patients can help reduce medication errors

    Margaret Polaneczky, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Dense breasts on mammogram? Don’t be afraid.

    Margaret Polaneczky, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    One example where the EMR can really make a difference in outcomes

    Margaret Polaneczky, MD

More in Conditions

  • Why GLP‑1 drugs should be covered beyond weight loss

    Rodney Lenfant
  • When recurrent UTIs might actually be bladder cancer

    Fara Bellows, MD
  • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

    Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed
  • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

    Adeel Khan, MD
  • Apprenticeship reshapes medical training for confident clinicians

    Claude E. Lett III, PA-C
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • A psychiatrist’s 20-year journey with ketamine

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Meds
    • How racism and policy failures shape reproductive health in America

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Education
    • Why GLP‑1 drugs should be covered beyond weight loss

      Rodney Lenfant | Conditions
    • How drug companies profit by inventing diseases

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • How value-based care reshapes kidney disease management for better outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Imagining a career path beyond medicine and its impact

      Hunter Delmoe | Education

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • A psychiatrist’s 20-year journey with ketamine

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Meds
    • How racism and policy failures shape reproductive health in America

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Education
    • Why GLP‑1 drugs should be covered beyond weight loss

      Rodney Lenfant | Conditions
    • How drug companies profit by inventing diseases

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • How value-based care reshapes kidney disease management for better outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Imagining a career path beyond medicine and its impact

      Hunter Delmoe | Education

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Mammograms in younger women: Is the data there?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...