Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The cholesterol debate: Seeking truth where there is no truth

Robert Centor, MD
Conditions
November 25, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

The New York Times recently had one of their periodic debates: When Medical Experts Disagree.

This debate actually centers on the current cholesterol guidelines, but the problem recurs often. Different experts look at the data and develop differing opinions. We see this with prostate screening, mammography, and treatment decisions.

As one reads the varying opinions in this debate, an understanding of the affect heuristic makes the debate transparent. When we like something, we overestimate the value and underestimate the risks and costs. This explains most conflicts of interest, and importantly conflicts of interest are not just pharmaceutical.

The experts writing the cholesterol guideline are heavily invested in the cholesterol hypothesis. The higher the cholesterol the worse the patient will do. Amazingly, the data made clear that only statins have excellent outcome data, so the panel dropped cholesterol goals for primary prevention and high yield secondary prevention (patients between 40-75 with type II diabetes mellitus or very high LDL cholesterol).

The controversy rests then on primary prevention. The experts like lowering cholesterol. They have accepted the data that statins trump every other drug class, and that other drug classes do not have sufficient outcome data to either add to statins or use alone. They know that primary prevention does decrease cardiac events. Because they like preventing cardiac events, they favor an aggressive approach to primary prevention.

Many other physicians worry about treating very large numbers of patients with a drug that both has significant costs and side effects (mostly muscle pain). These physicians are not as enamored with statins, unless the patient has very clear indications.

As one reads the various debaters, one can understand their contributions as resulting from the affect heuristic. One debater sees the pharmaceutical influence as a major evil — thus blames the pharmaceutical conflicts of interest (while apparently ignoring other conflicts). One debater clearly focuses on drug side effects, and cautions against using any new drugs, unless the new drug has proven major benefits.

Seeking truth where there is no truth will always frustrate physicians and patients. We have to balance risks, costs and benefits, and generally make these estimate with incomplete information. For rarely can we have complete information. We want to worship at the altar of evidence-based medicine, but we still must assess values, and values will always contain a subjective component.

Robert Centor is an internal medicine physician who blogs at DB’s Medical Rants.

Prev

Making the decision to be out on a medical school application

November 25, 2013 Kevin 106
…
Next

Doctors who call patients hypochondriacs are committing malpractice

November 25, 2013 Kevin 92
…

Tagged as: Cardiology, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Making the decision to be out on a medical school application
Next Post >
Doctors who call patients hypochondriacs are committing malpractice

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Robert Centor, MD

  • When the problem representation and the illness script do not match

    Robert Centor, MD
  • Think of diagnostic excellence as playing smooth jazz

    Robert Centor, MD
  • When constipation pain was worse than cancer pain

    Robert Centor, MD

More in Conditions

  • Earwax could hold secrets to cancer, Alzheimer’s, and heart disease

    Sandra Vamos, EdD and Domenic Alaimo
  • Why male fertility needs to be part of every health conversation

    Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
  • Why health care must adapt to meet the needs of older adults with disabilities

    Lynn A. Schaefer, PhD
  • 4 traits every new attending physician needs to thrive

    Sarah Epstein
  • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

    Pearl Jones, MD
  • Why local cardiac CT scans could save your life

    Benjamin Cohen, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The hidden incentives driving frivolous malpractice lawsuits

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Why what doctors say matters more than you think [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How Mark Twain would dismantle today’s flawed medical AI

      Neil Baum, MD and Mark Ibsen, MD | Tech
    • Mastering medical presentations: Elevating your impact

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Marketing as a clinician isn’t about selling. It’s about trust.

      Kara Pepper, MD | Physician
    • Graduating from medical school without family: a story of strength and survival

      Anonymous | Education

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The hidden incentives driving frivolous malpractice lawsuits

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Why what doctors say matters more than you think [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How Mark Twain would dismantle today’s flawed medical AI

      Neil Baum, MD and Mark Ibsen, MD | Tech
    • Mastering medical presentations: Elevating your impact

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Marketing as a clinician isn’t about selling. It’s about trust.

      Kara Pepper, MD | Physician
    • Graduating from medical school without family: a story of strength and survival

      Anonymous | Education

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The cholesterol debate: Seeking truth where there is no truth
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...