Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

A short term focus on costs is expensive in the long run

Adam Philip Stern, MD
Physician
August 1, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

Mr. D was my patient in the partial hospital program for the chronically and persistently mentally ill, and he was barely maintaining the level of functioning necessary to remain outside of the inpatient unit. A middle aged man with long-term psychotic and depressive symptoms, Mr. D’s care was made even more complicated by an extensive history of alcohol dependence and intravenous drug use that had left him with a severely damaged liver. A combination of hepatitis C viral infection and long-term daily alcohol use had left his body without the tools most of us take for granted in being able to metabolize and excrete the multitude of non-lethal toxins we all ingest and produce on a daily basis.

His long-term prognosis was poor, but in the context of his treatment at the partial hospital even the very short-term health and well-being of this patient remained very much in doubt. The liver disease was contributing all of the symptoms associated with hepatic encephalopathy — confusion, lethargy, difficulty coordinating his movements, impairments in attention and concentration.

The prescribed solution to that point was an old medication called lactulose which helped reduce the amount of ammonia in his blood stream by removing it through excretion in the colon; the consequence of this remedy was frequent diarrhea to the point of fecal incontinence. Mr. D would at times soil himself in the presence of others and became intensely ashamed of this result to the point that he began covertly refusing to take his medications.

It wasn’t long before the ammonia in his body built up to the point that his symptoms were out of control. He was entirely disoriented and was unable to perform even the most basic activities of daily living. He needed to be hospitalized at great expense just to bring him back to his already limited baseline. When he was discharged from the hospital, his discharge paperwork had on it a follow-up appointment with a liver specialist in several days. I tried to imagine Mr. D fully explaining the issues surrounding his treatment and had difficulty feeling comfortable that the necessary information would be conveyed.

With his permission, I decided to join the patient at his appointment not out of the goodness of my heart but rather a thirst for efficacy. Together, he and I were able to piece together all of the problems he had been having in tolerating the lactulose and explained why he found it too difficult to take regularly. The liver specialist appreciated his dilemma and decided to try a different medication called rifaximin, with equal efficacy but many fewer side effects. The medication is not a first-line treatment because it is on patent and very costly. But, the liver doctor assured us, the patient had now officially failed the lactulose and would qualify for the rifaximin with her advocacy.

Within days, Mr. D was taking rifaximin regularly and benefiting marvelously from the improved tolerability. Not only did his physical health improve, but it allowed for him to actively participate in the mental health treatment at the partial hospital day program. It was truly a life-changing intervention for this man.

When thinking about the system in place that nudged Mr. D and me down our common path, I couldn’t help but notice that the fear of increased cost in the short term (the policy dictating lactulose as a first line treatment in this patient over rifaximin) resulted in an increase in systemic costs when he required inpatient hospitalization. It seems in keeping with recent systemic efforts to determine what is the right treatment in the right place at the right time. My own low-tech intervention of escorting Mr. D to his appointment was equally evocative in my mind. It is apparent that relatively simple changes in the way we deliver health care have the potential to make profound changes in the outcomes we achieve.

Adam Philip Stern is a psychiatrist. 

costs_of_care_logo_small

This post originally appeared on the Costs of Care Blog. Costs of Care is a 501c3 nonprofit that is transforming American health care delivery by empowering patients and their caregivers to deflate medical bills. Follow us on Twitter @costsofcare.

Prev

The problematic impact of To Err is Human

August 1, 2014 Kevin 7
…
Next

Measuring the value of emergency department care

August 1, 2014 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Gastroenterology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The problematic impact of To Err is Human
Next Post >
Measuring the value of emergency department care

ADVERTISEMENT

More in Physician

  • What is professional inertia in medicine?

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • The rise of digital therapeutics in medicine

    Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD
  • Paraphimosis and diabetes: the hidden link

    Shirisha Kamidi, MD
  • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

    George F. Smith, MD
  • A doctor’s cure for imposter syndrome

    Noah V. Fiala, DO
  • Small habits, big impact on health

    Shirisha Kamidi, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The difference between a doctor and a physician

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • What is professional inertia in medicine?

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • Ethical AI in mental health: 6 key lessons

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Passing the medical boards at age 63 [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are losing the health care culture war

      Rusha Modi, MD, MPH | Policy
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • A cancer doctor’s warning about the future of medicine

      Banu Symington, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • What is professional inertia in medicine?

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A Huntington’s trial brings hope and grief

      Erin Paterson | Conditions
    • How misinformation endangers our progress against preventable diseases [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The rise of digital therapeutics in medicine

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Lipoprotein(a): the hidden cardiovascular risk factor

      Alexander Fohl, PharmD | Conditions
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 10 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The difference between a doctor and a physician

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • What is professional inertia in medicine?

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • Ethical AI in mental health: 6 key lessons

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Passing the medical boards at age 63 [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are losing the health care culture war

      Rusha Modi, MD, MPH | Policy
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • A cancer doctor’s warning about the future of medicine

      Banu Symington, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • What is professional inertia in medicine?

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A Huntington’s trial brings hope and grief

      Erin Paterson | Conditions
    • How misinformation endangers our progress against preventable diseases [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The rise of digital therapeutics in medicine

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Lipoprotein(a): the hidden cardiovascular risk factor

      Alexander Fohl, PharmD | Conditions
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

A short term focus on costs is expensive in the long run
10 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...