Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Bottom up: How grassroots input shapes ACP policies

Yul Ejnes, MD
Policy
September 11, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

acp new logoA guest column by the American College of Physicians, exclusive to KevinMD.com.

This month, the American College of Physicians’ Board of Governors (BOG) will meet in Chicago. One of the items on the agenda is the discussion of resolutions that will help to shape ACP policy. The resolutions process, which looks at proposed policy changes and directives to the Board of Regents (BOR) submitted by ACP Chapters and Councils, is a major part of the BOG’s work. Resolutions are a way of providing grassroots input to the BOR.

One of my biggest frustrations when I served on the BOR was battling the perception that ACP policy was developed “top-down.” I sometimes wondered whether people really thought that old men in robes and powdered wigs sat around a table in an ivory tower making decisions, without the benefit of input from the membership. This is hardly the case — ACP’s policy-making procedure is inclusive and well informed as a result of the resolutions process.

ACP has 70 chapters representing every state (some of the larger states have multiple regions, each with their own Governor), the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Uniformed Services, and international chapters in Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Saudi Arabia. Governors are elected by the members in their geographic region. ACP Chapter Governors are a diverse group. Almost 60% of members of the BOG are general internists, the rest internal medicine subspecialists. Over half spend 50% or more of their time in direct patient care, while only 10% provide no direct patient care. They practice in academic and private settings, and a large portion does so in primarily outpatient practices.

Resolutions submitted to the BOG can be on any topic. Chapter Governors and their Councils often write them, but any member may submit resolutions to their Chapter for approval. Once approved by the sponsoring Chapter, the resolution is referred for consideration at the next BOG meeting. Four months before the BOG meeting, the resolutions are posted on the BOG web page for online comment by the Governors, Regents, and other leaders, as well as on ACP’s website for comment by members.

Resolution topics range from national issues such as health care policy, medical education, reimbursement, and recertification to internal ACP matters such as dues, membership development, and communication. They can call for changes in ACP policy or direct the BOR to take a specific action, such as support legislation or develop a position paper on a topic.

The list of resolutions that the BOG will deliberate at its next meeting is a good example of the variety of subjects covered. The BOG will consider resolutions on eliminating co-payments for medications used for common chronic conditions, climate change, maintenance of certification, communication with ACP leadership, and registration fees for student poster presenters.

At the BOG meeting, a “Reference Committee” of Governors hears testimony on the resolutions. The Reference Committee is a mechanism for streamlining the process of carefully considering and refining the resolutions. Based on the live testimony and the online comments, the Reference Committee produces a report to the BOG with recommendations on which resolutions it should adopt as originally written, adopt with amendments, adopt as a reaffirmation of existing policy, or not adopt. At its business meeting, the BOG discusses the Reference Committee’s report in a parliamentary process where BOG members can accept, reject, or amend the Reference Committee’s recommendations.

Resolutions adopted by the BOG are transmitted to the BOR. Most of them are implemented as submitted. The BOR occasionally refers resolutions to committees for further study with a report back to BOR recommending whether to adopt the resolution in its original or an amended form, or not adopt. It is extraordinarily rare for a resolution from the BOG to be rejected by the BOR.

In summary, ACP Chapters can submit resolutions to the BOG calling for changes to ACP policy or action to be taken by the BOR. This is not the only way that ACP develops policy, but it is the most important one.

Of course, in an organization as large and diverse as ACP, members will not agree with every policy, but ACP members (and other physicians) should be aware of how the policies are developed and how they can participate in the process. For more information, contact your local Governor. Also, be sure to check ACP’s website for the call for member comments on BOG resolutions and ACP Internist for updates on the BOG’s actions on the resolutions.

Yul Ejnes is an internal medicine physician and a past chair, board of regents, American College of Physicians. His statements do not necessarily reflect official policies of ACP.

Prev

The ice bucket challenge: A poor way to allocate your donations

September 10, 2014 Kevin 6
…
Next

CVS removes tobacco products: Did they go far enough?

September 11, 2014 Kevin 6
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The ice bucket challenge: A poor way to allocate your donations
Next Post >
CVS removes tobacco products: Did they go far enough?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Yul Ejnes, MD

  • Different perspectives but the same goal: providing the best possible care to patients

    Yul Ejnes, MD
  • Rising premiums, high deductibles, and gaps in coverage before the ACA

    Yul Ejnes, MD
  • Improving physician satisfaction by eliminating unnecessary practice burdens

    Yul Ejnes, MD

More in Policy

  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • How fragmented records and poor tracking degrade patient outcomes

    Michael R. McGuire
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Bottom up: How grassroots input shapes ACP policies
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...