Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Exploring the Angelina Jolie effect in breast cancer screening

Alan Cassels
Conditions
September 26, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

Up to this point, it had only been a hypothesis: That celebrity firepower can definitively drive consumer health behavior in a certain direction. The case here concerns whether women wish to embark on a genetic hunting expedition to see if they are at high risk of developing a particular disease such as breast cancer, and the motivator in this case is Angelina Jolie.

The actress underwent genetic testing for mutations related to genetic abnormalities (BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes) which increases a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer. Coming from a family with a history of breast cancer, Jolie was considered to be in the higher risk category than average and she was likely among the small numbers of women who would benefit from such testing.

Later, after hearing she carried the mutations, Jolie went ahead with a double mastectomy — a full surgical removal of both breasts.  Not only did this generate a lot of media attention — including her own opinion piece in the New York Times — but it also drove a lot of women to get tested.

Researchers at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Hospital presented a study at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium looking at the Angelina Jolie effect.  The researchers compared the number of referrals for genetic counseling made six months before and after Jolie’s story came out, and those who were qualified for genetic testing for the BRCA gene mutation. Their results showed that the referrals almost doubled, and the number of those who qualified for genetic testing more than doubled.

This is a good news story for a few reasons.  It confirmed that low-risk women were not bugging their doctors unnecessarily.

What we expected from the publicity around Angelina Jolie’s story was that many women, fearful of their breast cancer risk (yet at low risk themselves), would be flooding their doctors’ offices asking for the genetic test.   In fact, predicting this, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF),an independent group of scientists making recommendations on medical screening, issued a warning last year saying that BRCA testing to find gene mutations associated with breast cancer should not be sought by women at low risk and unlikely to benefit.

Telling women not to seek routine genetic counseling or testing is undoubtedly controversial.

Certainly women are driven to ask about genetic testing given a strong fear of breast cancer and a strong belief that early testing saves lives, but USPSTF feared many of the new customers lining up for the test would be classified as the “worried well” who would be unlikely to carry the rare genetic mutation and hence would receive no benefit from being screened.  Obviously for those low-risk women, the prophylactic removal of one’s breasts is an extreme measure that carries risks in itself.

There have been other times when public health authorities have taken note of health advice coming from celebrities.  The term, “Katie Couric effect” was coined, referring to the public impact of her having a colonoscopy performed live on the Today Show.   Bringing high-powered attention to any kind of cancer screening is certainly one way to get people off the couch and heading to their doctors to do something they would not otherwise do.

At the end of the day, people seeking screening of any kind, whether it is for breast, lung or prostate cancers or signs of heart disease, should have a frank discussion with their doctors of what their risk is likely to be given their unique family and disease history.  If it is considered high, then your chances of benefiting from screening are also higher  than if you are at low or moderate risk to start with.

In the case of those who are likely to carry the genetic anomalies leading to increased breast cancer risk, somewhere between two and three in one thousand women will carry the same genetic anomalies as Angelina Jolie — and if a high number of those carrying the gene seek screening, that’s a good thing.

But at the same time we shouldn’t be too dazzled by celebrity magnetism and dive into screening for the sake of screening.  Screening of any kind carries risks of false positives (being told you have a disease when you don’t) and false negatives (being told you are disease-free when you’re not).

The teaching mantra from Angelina Jolie’s story should not be “the early bird gets the worm,” but rather, get informed and look before you leap.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alan Cassels is a health policy researcher, University of Victoria, British Columbia Canada and the author of Seeking Sickness: Medical Screening and the Misguided Hunt for Disease.  He is an expert advisor, Evidence Network.

Prev

A palliative care dilemma on the first day of the job

September 25, 2014 Kevin 30
…
Next

Physician assistants: 5 predictions in the era of health reform

September 26, 2014 Kevin 47
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A palliative care dilemma on the first day of the job
Next Post >
Physician assistants: 5 predictions in the era of health reform

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Alan Cassels

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Drug treatment for female sexuality not about equality but profits

    Alan Cassels

More in Conditions

  • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

    Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed
  • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

    Adeel Khan, MD
  • Apprenticeship reshapes medical training for confident clinicians

    Claude E. Lett III, PA-C
  • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

    Dr. Vishal Parackal
  • My improbable survival of stage 4 cancer

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Exploring the Angelina Jolie effect in breast cancer screening
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...