Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Remember the psychological harms of cancer screening

Kenneth Lin, MD
Conditions
March 25, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

Several years ago, a few colleagues and I performed a systematic evidence review to help update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s recommendations on screening for prostate cancer. One of our key questions asked about the harms associated with prostate cancer screening, other than the overdiagnosis (and resulting unnecessary treatment) of clinically insignificant tumors. Since routine prostate-specific antigen screening had been going on for nearly two decades by then, we expected to find plenty of studies measuring anxiety and other mental health changes caused by false positive or indeterminate screening results.

In fact, after sifting through more than four hundred citations, we only found four articles describing three studies. Only one of the studies followed men for as long as one year. Here’s what we wrote about that study:

[The authors] compared 167 men who had an abnormal screening result but a benign biopsy specimen with 233 men who had a normal PSA level. After six weeks, 49 percent of men in the biopsy group reported thinking about prostate cancer “a lot” or “some of the time,” compared with 18 percent of the control group. In addition, 40 percent of the biopsy group worried “a lot” or “some of the time” about developing prostate cancer compared with 8% of the control group … Statistically significant differences between the biopsy and control groups in anxiety related to prostate cancer and perceived prostate cancer risk persisted six months and one year later.

One might think that men with normal biopsies following an elevated PSA level should have been reassured that they had dodged a bullet and been pronounced prostate cancer-free. In fact, exactly the opposite occurred. And that’s hardly surprising, since prostate biopsies, unlike breast biopsies, usually don’t aim for a particular location of concern, leaving open the worrisome possibility that the biopsy needle just didn’t sample the cancer if it was there. (How uncommonly cancer cells found in the prostate spread and lead to symptoms or death is another issue entirely.)

In the seven years since that review was published, the USPSTF has recommended against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer and recommended for low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in selected patients. There has been a major shift in how scientists view cancer screening and more interest in studying previously undescribed harms. In a review of psychological harms of screening published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, Dr. Jessica DeFrank and colleagues assessed the literature on the burden or frequency of psychological harm associated with screening for prostate cancer (42 studies), lung cancer (11 studies), osteoporosis (6 studies), abdominal aortic aneurysm (8 studies), and carotid artery stenosis (1 study). They observed that for most screening tests, there remain large gaps in the evidence about the magnitude and frequency of such harms in populations representative of those receiving the tests. (I hasten to add that neither the USPSTF nor any other legitimate medical organization recommends ultrasound screening for carotid artery stenosis.)

Causing someone needless worry about cancer or another absent health condition can seem trivial compared to the prospect of saving a life. But increasing recognition of the limitations of screening for cancer and disease in general and the nearly nonexistent effect of these tests on all-cause mortality, have altered the equation. If more than 96 percent of initially positive screens turn out to be false positives (as is the case for lung cancer screening), just how much anxiety and worry are we as a society willing to inflict to merely exchange one cause of death for another?

Kenneth Lin is a family physician who blogs at Common Sense Family Doctor.

Prev

Coping with a move: A medical marriage Q&A

March 25, 2015 Kevin 1
…
Next

The obsession with numbers in medicine: It's time to stop

March 25, 2015 Kevin 8
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Coping with a move: A medical marriage Q&A
Next Post >
The obsession with numbers in medicine: It's time to stop

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Kenneth Lin, MD

  • How to recruit more students into family medicine

    Kenneth Lin, MD
  • When should you prescribe statins for older adults?

    Kenneth Lin, MD
  • Clinical practice guidelines have problems, but they’re not broken

    Kenneth Lin, MD

More in Conditions

  • A physician’s tribute to respiratory therapists

    Zoran Naumovski, MD
  • How to protect your voice like a professional

    Carly Bergey, CCC-SLP
  • Is Alzheimer’s an infectious disease?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Life after GLP-1s: How to sustain weight loss

    Ricky Bloomfield, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    A new framework for depression recovery

    Elias Dejesus, RN
  • Why health self-advocacy is an essential life skill

    Alan P. Feren, MD & Joyce Griggs
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The stoic cure for modern anxiety

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are losing the health care culture war

      Rusha Modi, MD, MPH | Policy
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The difference between a leader, a manager, and an innovator

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The ignored clinical trials on statins and mortality

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • Why medicine needs a second Flexner Report

      Robert C. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • A physician’s tribute to respiratory therapists

      Zoran Naumovski, MD | Conditions
    • A cancer doctor’s warning about the future of medicine

      Banu Symington, MD | Physician
    • How to protect your voice like a professional

      Carly Bergey, CCC-SLP | Conditions
    • How physicians can use faith, family, friendship, and fulfillment to combat burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Is Alzheimer’s an infectious disease?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • Life after GLP-1s: How to sustain weight loss

      Ricky Bloomfield, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The stoic cure for modern anxiety

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are losing the health care culture war

      Rusha Modi, MD, MPH | Policy
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The difference between a leader, a manager, and an innovator

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The ignored clinical trials on statins and mortality

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • Why medicine needs a second Flexner Report

      Robert C. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • A physician’s tribute to respiratory therapists

      Zoran Naumovski, MD | Conditions
    • A cancer doctor’s warning about the future of medicine

      Banu Symington, MD | Physician
    • How to protect your voice like a professional

      Carly Bergey, CCC-SLP | Conditions
    • How physicians can use faith, family, friendship, and fulfillment to combat burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Is Alzheimer’s an infectious disease?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • Life after GLP-1s: How to sustain weight loss

      Ricky Bloomfield, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Remember the psychological harms of cancer screening
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...