Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Patient autonomy is held to be sacrosanct. A doctor reconsiders this view.

Anonymous
Conditions
September 26, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

The refusal of blood products by the Jehovah’s witnesses has often been cited as a great example of patient religious freedom triumphing over the traditional paternalism of medicine. Patients are free to refuse transfusion even at the risk of death. Many hospital-based physicians have, at one time or another, been witness to the demise of a patient refusing blood products, perhaps a preventable demise. Patient autonomy is held to be sacrosanct. My recent experiences, however, have led me to reconsider this view.

A 21-year-old male of African-American descent, a Jehovah’s Witness, with a history of sickle cell anemia presents with diffuse pain and weakness. His admission hemoglobin is 6. His admitting diagnosis is sickle cell crisis. He is treated with fluids, IV opiates, and empiric antibiotics. His blood counts continue to fall. He is asked if he would accept transfusion. He seems uncertain, until his mother indicates the entire family are Jehovah’s witnesses and under no circumstances would any of the family accept blood. The patient quietly refuses transfusion. Church officials start to spend a considerable amount of time in the room and waiting area. They approach multiple health professionals and attempt to hand them literature with recommendations for care of patients without transfusion. The president of the hospital is called when the recommendations are not hewed to. His hemoglobin continues to fall and reaches a nadir of 4. He becomes more tachycardic and tachypnic, but continues to decline transfusion.

The traditional way health care providers have been educated to view and treat Jehovah’s Witness is through the lens of religious liberty. Our constitution, through the establishment clause, bars the state from establishing any specific religion as the state religion. This frees the individual to practice any faith-based system. All medical treatment requires patient consent and individuals are free to base their consent on both science and faith. Jehovah’s witnesses are assumed to base their lack of consent to blood products on their faith. We as a society protect the right of the individual to refuse treatment based on religious grounds. The state’s interest in preserving life does not trump (a good word now besmirched) the individual’s religious liberty. We are free to knowingly refuse treatment.

Perhaps patients who are Jehovah’s Witnesses are not making decisions based on faith but instead are making decisions based on fear. The practice which medical professionals would likely find disturbing is called shunning or in the words of the church, “disfellowshipping.”  This punishment is used for members of the church who have committed a serious sin. As a consequence of disfellowshipping or shunning other church members may no longer associate with the person. Not even a hello is permitted. These result in the individual being isolated from those he/she loves, a strong form of social coercion. If school children were to engage is such behavior we would call it bullying. And yes, receiving blood products is one of the sins that in the eyes of the church can merit disfellowshipping.

It is this type of coercion, which distinguishes religion from cults. The definition of cult can be problematic, and the term is certainly loaded with negative connotations. Two features that distinguish cults from mainstream religions. One is the beliefs that may result in harm to the individual or others. Giving up a productive career to beg for alms in an airport is mildly harmful. Drinking Kool-Aid with cyanide, as occurred in Jonestown lies at the other end of the spectrum. The other feature of cults is the use of social controls to influence the behavior of members. Cults will often strongly discourage members from out-group socializing. This makes the practice of shunning a strong form of social control.

In most mainstream Judeo-Christian belief, sin is contextual. An observant Jew or Muslim may accept a porcine valve but refuse bacon post op. A porcine valve may be lifesaving outweighing the concern over its origin. A Christian in wartime may steal a loaf of bread, but the sin is forgiven. The greater good is survival in the time of war; the sin of thievery is forgiven in this context. The belief blood transfusion is sinful may have scriptural basis but the response is not consistent with Judeo-Christian tradition. In many instances, the transfusion of blood products is life saving. Contextualizing this type of sin does not usually result in a punishment as severe as shunning, but instead it is seen as a sin requiring forgiveness. The practice of shunning rather than forgiveness places Jehovah’s Witnesses out of the mainstream and into the realm of cults.

I have witnessed church officials residing at the bedside of our ICU patients with the stated purpose of ensuring no blood products are administered.  No patient needs to fear unwanted procedures being performed without informed signed consent; this is the age in which medicine lives.  Out of the cauldron of sterilization programs, lobotomies, the Tuskegee experiment has emerged a culture of strict adherence to informed consent.  It is guaranteed the forms must be signed before we as medical professionals can act. I raise the question:  What is the role of these church officials? Is their presence to guard the patient against unwanted medical care, or does their presence serve to intimidate the patient? Signing a consent form and agreeing to a sin in the presence of a church official, strikes me as difficult. If a private moment is found to sign a consent, church officials or family with the power to shun may walk in at any moment and see blood hanging. Blood cannot be given quickly and inauspiciously. Might the more realistic fear of church officials be consent given freely, not blood given without consent?

We are free to refuse consent for medical treatments. The ability to exercise our free will requires a non-coercive environment. Our legal system does not allow confessions or testimony that have been obtained through coercion. How are we medical professionals able to provide the liberty to make decisions for all our patients? Is asking to speak alone with the patient without family or church officials enough in the face of what can be seen as bullying? Can we as medical professionals expect reasoned guidance from the legal system? Is it sufficient to assume that Jehovah’s Witnesses are free to leave the church; therefore any of the conduct of the church is moot? I am of the belief our national organizations need to address this situation; individual action on the part of physicians is likely to be counterproductive.

The author is an anonymous physician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Conversations lead to better health, not interrogations

September 26, 2015 Kevin 5
…
Next

Tips to meet challenges of administering and tracking immunizations

September 26, 2015 Kevin 29
…

Tagged as: Critical Care, Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Conversations lead to better health, not interrogations
Next Post >
Tips to meet challenges of administering and tracking immunizations

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Anonymous

  • When the white coats become gatekeepers: How a quiet cartel strangles America’s health

    Anonymous
  • Graduating from medical school without family: a story of strength and survival

    Anonymous
  • Why young doctors in South Korea feel broken before they even begin

    Anonymous

Related Posts

  • Patient autonomy in times of shortage

    Deepak Gupta, MD
  • COVID, paternalism, and the death of patient autonomy

    Garrett Jensen
  • A universal patient medical record

    Michael R. McGuire
  • A patient waits. And waits.

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Treating the patient’s body is not synonymous with treating the patient

    Steven Zhang, MD
  • Physicians are trapped between patient satisfaction and unnecessary prescribing

    Richard Young, MD

More in Conditions

  • Finding healing in narrative medicine: When words replace silence

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Why coaching is not a substitute for psychotherapy

    Maire Daugharty, MD
  • Why doctors stay silent about preventable harm

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

    Safina Adatia, MD
  • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

    David Fischel
  • How the shingles vaccine could help prevent dementia

    Marc Arginteanu, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • In a fractured world, Brian Wilson’s message still heals

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • When your dream job becomes a nightmare [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How doctors took back control from hospital executives

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • When your dream job becomes a nightmare [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Finding healing in narrative medicine: When words replace silence

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Why coaching is not a substitute for psychotherapy

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • When the white coats become gatekeepers: How a quiet cartel strangles America’s health

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Why doctors stay silent about preventable harm

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Conditions
    • Why interoperability is key to achieving the quintuple aim in health care

      Steven Lane, MD | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 85 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • In a fractured world, Brian Wilson’s message still heals

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • When your dream job becomes a nightmare [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How doctors took back control from hospital executives

      Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • When your dream job becomes a nightmare [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Finding healing in narrative medicine: When words replace silence

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • Why coaching is not a substitute for psychotherapy

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • When the white coats become gatekeepers: How a quiet cartel strangles America’s health

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Why doctors stay silent about preventable harm

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Conditions
    • Why interoperability is key to achieving the quintuple aim in health care

      Steven Lane, MD | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Patient autonomy is held to be sacrosanct. A doctor reconsiders this view.
85 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...