Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The word “provider” dehumanizes any person who cares for patients

Janice Mancuso
Physician
December 15, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

“Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind.”
– Rudyard Kipling

I read Drs. Dhand’s and Carbone’s post with great interest: Physicians are not providers: An open letter to the AMA and medical boards. I began writing a comment; it turned into an essay.

I support Drs. Dhand and Carbone in this endeavor. The word “provider” diminishes the people who cure, treat, and heal, whether they’re physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, etc.

The dictionary definitions were all similar. A provider can be a person, organization, or business that provides a good or service. But, we know a physician, etc., cannot be a business or an organization.

“Physician” is defined as a person who is qualified to practice medicine, and also a person skilled in the art of healing. There’s no mention about providing a good or service.

A service is a helpful activity, and the definitions go down from there. Utilities, commodities, maintenance, the supplier of public communication or transportation, the duties performed by or as a waiter or servant.

“Provider” dehumanizes any person who cares for patients (who, by the way, are not “customers”).

The open letter request should be low-hanging fruit for the AMA and state medical boards. I can’t understand why all physicians wouldn’t enthusiastically support this action. It’s not an either-or situation. Unlike the items listed in in this comment, this remedy can happen instantly, and it doesn’t cost dollars. It’s about eliminating (or exchanging) only one word in their lexicon. As the authors suggested, if a generic term must be used, replace “provider” with “clinician”… which, by the way, is defined as “a person (such as a doctor or nurse) who works directly with patients rather than in a laboratory or as a researcher.”

If all of you who submit essays to, comment on, or simply read KevinMD, made that easy fix in your own language, and respectfully corrected persons when they refer to you or your colleagues as “providers” or “mid-level providers,” change would occur.

This isn’t about political correctness; it’s about incremental steps to take back medicine and change the culture of medicine as bloggers or commenters often declare they want to see happen.

I do disagree, though, with one thing in Drs. Dhand and Carbone’s letter. “The word ‘provider’ is a non-specific and nondescript term that confers little meaning.” Oh, it confers meaning all right … just not the meaning one associates with those who dedicate their lives to serving* others by caring for us, often at our most vulnerable times.

* For the record, this is the definition of serve that applies here: “to be useful or of service to; help.”

Janice Mancuso is creator, The Osler Symposia: Weekend Retreats for Doctors & Nurses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

An infectious holiday video: It's beginning to look a lot like sepsis

December 15, 2015 Kevin 2
…
Next

Physicians are jaded, but this is what keeps them in medicine

December 15, 2015 Kevin 13
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
An infectious holiday video: It's beginning to look a lot like sepsis
Next Post >
Physicians are jaded, but this is what keeps them in medicine

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Janice Mancuso

  • Why Sir William Osler is the cure to online cynicism

    Janice Mancuso
  • What does Sir William Osler think about physician burnout?

    Janice Mancuso

Related Posts

  • Are patients using social media to attack physicians?

    David R. Stukus, MD
  • The CDC word ban: an attack on the patients I treat

    Rachel Alinsky, MD
  • You are abandoning your patients if you are not active on social media

    Pat Rich
  • One person’s wasteful medical spending is another person’s income

    Edward Hoffer, MD
  • A love letter to patients

    Marcie Costello
  • Patients are not passengers

    Christopher Noll, RN, MSN

More in Physician

  • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

    Christie Mulholland, MD
  • The moral injury of “not medically necessary” denials

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Is physician unionization the answer to a broken health care system?

    Allan Dobzyniak, MD
  • The decline of professionalism in medicine: a structural diagnosis

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • The patchwork era of medical board certification

    Brian Hudes, MD
  • How neurodiversity in relationships shapes communication

    Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Why insurance must cover home blood pressure monitors

      Soneesh Kothagundla | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Silence is a survival mechanism that costs women their joy [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • FDA loosens AI oversight: What clinicians need to know about the 2026 guidance

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Focusing on outcomes over novelty prevents AI failure in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 47 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Why insurance must cover home blood pressure monitors

      Soneesh Kothagundla | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Silence is a survival mechanism that costs women their joy [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • FDA loosens AI oversight: What clinicians need to know about the 2026 guidance

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Focusing on outcomes over novelty prevents AI failure in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The word “provider” dehumanizes any person who cares for patients
47 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...