Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Observation status and readmissions: The data may surprise you

Ashish Jha, MD, MPH
Policy
March 14, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

Because hospitals are expensive and often cause harm, there has been a big focus on reducing hospital use.  This focus has been the underpinning for numerous policy interventions, most notable of which is the Affordable Care Act’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), which penalizes hospitals for higher than expected readmission rates.  The motivation behind HRRP is simple:  the readmission rate, the proportion of discharged patients who return to the hospital within 30 days, had been more or less flat for years and reducing this rate would save money and potentially improve care.  So it was big news when, as the HRRP penalties kicked in, government officials started reporting that the national readmission rate for Medicare patients was declining.

Rising use of observation status

But during this time, another phenomenon was coming into focus: increasing use of observation status.  When a patient needs hospital services, there are two options: that patient can be admitted for inpatient care or can be “admitted to observation.” When patients are “admitted to observation” they essentially still get inpatient care, but technically, they are outpatients.  For a variety of reasons, we’ve seen a decline in patients admitted to “inpatient” status and a rise in those going to observation status.  These two phenomena — a drop in readmissions and an increase in observation — seemed related.

I — and others — spoke publicly about our concerns that the drop in readmissions was being driven by increasing observation admissions. An analysis by David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler in the Health Affairs blog suggested that most of the drop in readmissions could be accounted for both by increases in observation status and by increases in returns to the emergency department that did not lead to readmission.  Two months later, a piece by Claire Noel-Miller and Keith Lund, also in the Health Affairs blog, found that the hospitals with the biggest drop in readmissions appeared to have big increases in their use of observation status.  It seemed like much of the drop in readmissions was about reclassifying people as “observation” and administratively lowering readmissions without changing care.

New Data

Now comes a terrific, high quality study in the New England Journal of Medicine that takes this topic head on.  The authors examine directly whether the hospitals that lowered their readmission rates were the same ones that increased their observation status — and find no correlation.  None.  If you’re ever looking for a scatter plot of two variables that are completely uncorrelated, look no further than Figure 3 of the paper.  The best reading of the evidence prior to the study did not turn out to be the truth.  It reminds me of the period we were all convinced, based on excellent observational data, that hormone replacement therapy was lifesaving for women with cardiovascular disease.  And that became the standard of care — until someone conducted a randomized trial, and found that HRT provided little benefit to these patients.  That’s why we do research — it moves our knowledge forward.

blog-pic

Where are we now?

So where does this leave us?  Is the ACA’s readmissions policy a home run?  Here’s what we know: the HRRP has, most likely (we have no controls) led to fewer patients being readmitted to the hospital. Second, the HRRP does not seem responsible for the increase in observation stays.

Here’s what we don’t know: Is a drop in readmissions a good thing for patients? It may seem obvious that it is, but if you think about it, you realize that readmission rate is a utilization measure, not a patient outcome.  It’s a measure of how often patients use inpatient services within 30 days of discharge. Utilization measures, unto themselves, don’t tell you whether care is good or bad. So the real question is — has the HRRP improved the underlying quality of care? It might be that we have improved on care coordination, communications between hospitals and primary care providers, and ensuring good follow-up. That likely happened in some places. Alternatively, it might be that we have just made it much harder for that older, frail woman with heart failure sitting in the emergency room to get admitted if she was discharged in the last 30 days. That too has likely happened in some places. But how much of it is the former versus the latter? Until we can answer that question, we won’t know whether care is better or not.

Beyond understanding why readmissions have fallen, we also don’t know how HRRP has affected the other things that hospitals ought to focus on, such as mortality and infection rates. If your parent was admitted to the hospital with pneumonia, what would be your top priority? Most people would say that they would like their parent not to die. The second might be to avoid serious complications like a healthcare associated infection or a fall that leads to a hip fracture. Another might be to be treated with dignity and respect. Yes, avoiding being readmitted would be nice — but for me at least, it pales in comparison to avoiding death and disability.  We know little about the potential spillover effects of the readmission penalties on the things that matter the most.

So here we are — a good news study that says readmissions are down because fewer people are being readmitted to the hospital, not because people are being admitted to observation status. That’s important.  But the real challenge is in figuring out whether patients are better off.  Are they more likely to be alive after hospitalization? Do they have fewer functional limitations? Less pain and suffering? Until we answer those questions, it’ll be hard to know whether this policy is making the kind of difference we want. And that’s the point of science — using data to answer those questions. Because we all can have our opinions — but ultimately, it’s the data that counts.

Ashish Jha is an associate professor of health policy and management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.  He blogs at An Ounce of Evidence and can be found on Twitter @ashishkjha.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Young doctors need to spend time in Veterans Affairs hospitals

March 14, 2016 Kevin 0
…
Next

It takes more than incentives to engage physicians

March 15, 2016 Kevin 27
…

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine, Medicare

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Young doctors need to spend time in Veterans Affairs hospitals
Next Post >
It takes more than incentives to engage physicians

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Ashish Jha, MD, MPH

  • Ranking the world’s health systems: These results may surprise you

    Ashish Jha, MD, MPH
  • How much does it matter which hospital you go to?

    Ashish Jha, MD, MPH
  • Men and women doctors versus correlation and causation

    Ashish Jha, MD, MPH

Related Posts

  • Where’s the big COVID data?

    Anuradha Kolluru, MD and Rakesh Lattupalli, MD
  • The claims data dilemma: 4 things to consider

    Martin Lustick, MD
  • Our laws don’t do enough to protect our health data

    Sharona Hoffman, JD
  • Let’s end surprise billing without a Trojan Horse

    Damian Caraballo, MD
  • A new boon for Big Data and patient care

    Michael R. McGuire
  • Compromise vs. greed in ending surprise medical bills

    Robert Laszewski

More in Policy

  • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws

    BJ Ferguson
  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Why physicians deserve more than an oxygen mask

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Avarie’s story: Confronting the deadly gaps in food allergy education and emergency response [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Avarie’s story: Confronting the deadly gaps in food allergy education and emergency response [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why the physician shortage may be our last line of defense

      Yuri Aronov, MD | Physician
    • 5 years later: Doctors reveal the untold truths of COVID-19

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden cost of health care: burnout, disillusionment, and systemic betrayal

      Nivedita U. Jerath, MD | Physician
    • What one diagnosis can change: the movement to make dining safer

      Lianne Mandelbaum, PT | Conditions
    • Why this doctor hid her story for a decade

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 8 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • Why physicians deserve more than an oxygen mask

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Avarie’s story: Confronting the deadly gaps in food allergy education and emergency response [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Avarie’s story: Confronting the deadly gaps in food allergy education and emergency response [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why the physician shortage may be our last line of defense

      Yuri Aronov, MD | Physician
    • 5 years later: Doctors reveal the untold truths of COVID-19

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden cost of health care: burnout, disillusionment, and systemic betrayal

      Nivedita U. Jerath, MD | Physician
    • What one diagnosis can change: the movement to make dining safer

      Lianne Mandelbaum, PT | Conditions
    • Why this doctor hid her story for a decade

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Observation status and readmissions: The data may surprise you
8 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...