Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The financial ramifications of medical school

Cory Michael, MD
Education
December 19, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

I thought long and hard about the financial ramifications of medical school before I started. I already had a job in the medical field that I enjoyed, and I was happy with my level of compensation at the time. After running the numbers, I knew that the choice to pursue medicine would result in a delayed economic benefit that would take at least 15 years to recover, and only through student loans would the immediate enormous pay cut allow me to tread water during the training.

A little historical perspective is in order. Had I entered medical school immediately after college, my in-state tuition rate would have been under $10,000 per year. The rate I paid some years later was roughly double that near the $17,000 mark, and the in-state rate today at the same school is approximately $24,000 which actually makes it one of the most affordable medical schools in the country. In contrast, private medical school enrollees and those paying out-of-state tuition are typically charged well over $50,000 per year. With the ability to borrow for living expenses factored in, it is common to see students borrowing more than $200,000 over 4 years with several sources endorsing an average debt of between $160,000 and $190,000 among those who borrow. At the same time, physician salaries in many specialties have plateaued or dropped in recent years.

Why has tuition risen so sharply? It’s relevant to point out that tuition comprises only a few percent of the operating budget at most institutions, so the answer seems to be that we are simply willing to pay it. It’s no secret that all college tuition has inflated in recent years, and a big reason is because students so often simply borrow the money from the federal government to pay the school. Medicine is no different. I am admittedly an expert in this process, having taken out my first student loans during the Clinton administration at the advent of the direct lending process in the 1990s.

The repayment process, it turns out, has also grown more complex since my college days. There used to be a clause that many medical residents (those people in 3 to 8 years of supervised practice after medical school) often took advantage of called the “20/200 pathway.” The rule held that those employed full time could defer loans (avoid payments and subsidized interest) if debt burden was greater than 20 percent of annual income and income minus debt burden was less than 220 percent of the federal poverty level. The College Cost Reduction Act (CCRA) of 2007 abolished this pathway and instituted new income-based repayment options (which have also grown more complex in the past 10 years) and loan forgiveness mechanisms while fixing graduate-level lending at a 6.8 percent interest rate.

In medicine, the most controversial aspect of the CCRA has become the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF) which is slated to forgive federal loan balances after 10 years of income-based monthly payments for those working in the public or not-for-profit sector over the course of the 120 payments. Borrowers who graduated in 2007 will begin applying for forgiveness in 2017. In the interest of brevity, I will explain this program from the standpoint of a radiology resident who graduated from medical school in 2008 with $250,000 of debt. The training path for her was five years residency followed by two 1-year fellowships that she had to take because the radiology job market tanked horribly in 2013. She decided to forgo a lucrative private practice position because she enjoyed teaching and signed on as a medical school faculty member at a pay rate which was roughly 60 percent of private practice income. Assuming she made income-based payments during the seven years of training working for a nonprofit center of graduate medical education or university, her loans will be forgiven three years into practice. If the PSLF remains unchanged, the government may wind up forgiving $200,000 or more.

There are a lot of conditions which have to be met for participants to partake in this system, and in fairness, the terms of the plan are spelled out when the borrower signs the promissory note. Doctors who participate are not gaming the system. They are actually fulfilling the terms as written and approved by the government during the George W. Bush presidency while keeping with the spirit of the law and in many cases forfeiting considerable revenue. Truth be told, there is really not much benefit in PSLF for physicians spending only a few years in residency, and the availability of programs like this may be necessary in areas where physicians are otherwise unwilling to teach. Nonetheless, many can’t see how this system will be sustainable for any length of time, and recent budget proposals have toyed with capping PSLF forgiveness to prevent abuse.

I have recently switched from the traditional income-based repayment plan (15 percent of disposable income) to the revised pay as you earn plan (10 percent of disposable income). Despite a long history of student loan research, I remained unaware of the complex conditions required to make the transition including a month of sitting out of the PSLF. For those seeking refuge in one of the new programs created during the Obama administration, do your homework. I’ve had many problems with the loan servicer including multiple unrequested forbearances and automatic payment snafus, but in the end, I hope that the aggravation will make the process worthwhile. Regardless, I’m of the opinion that paying off student loans should never be a priority in the face of other debt and a financial plan that can yield more investment-related income than the cost of student loan interest. Income-based repayment plans will thus remain a constant for me with or without forgiveness.

At the end of the day, someone will have to deal with the problem of medical student debt in a more sound way. The system cannot absorb the cost of increasing medical education costs by simply forgiving debt generated by exorbitant charges. The days of guaranteed physician wealth are dwindling.

Cory Michael is a radiologist.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

The loss of a pregnancy is never taken lightly

December 18, 2016 Kevin 2
…
Next

How the press coverage of the WHO Zika designation change hurt us

December 19, 2016 Kevin 14
…

Tagged as: Medical school

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The loss of a pregnancy is never taken lightly
Next Post >
How the press coverage of the WHO Zika designation change hurt us

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Cory Michael, MD

  • Inequity contributes to burnout among new academic physicians

    Cory Michael, MD
  • Missouri and Texas: a tale of 2 COVID cultures

    Cory Michael, MD
  • The coronavirus vaccine is not a political or social issue

    Cory Michael, MD

Related Posts

  • The financial barriers of applying to medical school

    Shin Mei Chan and Jamieson O’Marr
  • End medical school grades

    Adam Lieber
  • The medical school personal statement struggle

    Sheindel Ifrah
  • It’s time to learn the basics of financial management in medical school

    Aashish Shah
  • Why medical school is like playing defense

    Jamie Katuna
  • Promote a culture of medical school peer education

    Albert Jang, MD

More in Education

  • Moral courage in medical training: the power of the powerless

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Medical education’s blind spot: the cost of diagnostic testing

    Helena Kaso, MPA
  • Why almost nobody needs a PhD anymore: an educator’s perspective

    Richard A. Lawhern, PhD
  • Health advice vs. medical advice: Why the difference matters

    Abd-Alrahman Taha
  • Pediatric care barriers in West Africa: a clinician’s perspective

    Maureen Oluwaseun Adeboye
  • AI in medical education: the risk to professional identity formation

    Vijay Rajput, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • Women in health care leadership: Navigating competition and mentorship

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Senior financial scams: a guide for primary care physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • Women in health care leadership: Navigating competition and mentorship

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Senior financial scams: a guide for primary care physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The financial ramifications of medical school
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...