Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

More is not always better with fertility treatment

Claire Jones, MD and Eileen McMahon, NP
Conditions
February 18, 2020
Share
Tweet
Share

The fertility clinic waiting room is a space where many people will find themselves at some point in their lives. In spite of cheery music, shared success stories, infertility awareness weeks, and positive media campaigns, this can be a challenging and sensitive time.

About one in six Canadians experience fertility problems — these range from difficulties getting pregnant to difficulties staying pregnant and experiencing pregnancy loss.

As fertility specialists, we know that most of our patients have a very specific goal: having a baby and growing their families. They are very motivated and focused and make sacrifices of their time, resources, relationships, and well-being to achieve it.

Fertility treatments can be intensive and disruptive to the lives and routines of our patients. Our protocols often involve invasive testing and examinations that need to be done on nearly a daily basis for periods of time. These can include frequent internal (transvaginal) ultrasound alongside daily injection medications and blood work. These tests and treatments are timed to our patients’ menstrual cycles, which can sometimes be difficult to predict or plan ahead of time.

But not all tests, medications, and treatments offer clinical value. And more is not always better when it comes to fertility treatment.

To help ensure fertility patients aren’t offered options that are not clinically beneficial, the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS), which represents over 800 reproductive specialists, scientists and allied health professionals working in the field of Assisted Reproduction in Canada, has joined with the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign, to urge both clinicians and patients to talk about what interventions they need and what will not benefit them.

We have developed a list of recommendations showing that sometimes in reproductive medicine, more interventions may be unnecessary, wasteful, and sometimes harmful. While our patients are looking for hope and good outcomes, we shouldn’t try to meet these expectations with unnecessary medications, procedures, and tests. This wastes precious health care resources, our patients’ time, and, most importantly, can cause harm.

Patients undergoing fertility care spend a lot of time in our waiting rooms, but fertility doctors need to do better as a profession to ensure that it is time well spent.

One of the recommendations on our list has to do with the overuse of medications; specifically, patients should avoid high doses of gonadotropins during ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

Gonadotropins are injectable hormones patients are taught to self-inject during IVF cycles in order to grow multiple follicles, each of which contains an egg. The goal is to have multiple mature eggs, which can be assisted by these medications. However, too much of this medication can have very harmful side effects, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, causing bloating, pain, fluid in the abdomen and lungs, and other harmful side effects.

Another recommendation on our list is about unnecessary testing, such as avoiding routine genetic testing on embryos prior to IVF. While this testing can be beneficial for certain patients, it should not be recommended for all, especially since the testing carries a risk of misdiagnosis and is expensive, which can add undue stress to an already stressful experience.

Reducing unnecessary testing and treatments in reproductive medicine is a powerful way to demonstrate respect for those undergoing the procedures: their time, bodies, and well-being.

Instead of asking patients to come to clinic for a redundant test or treatment that won’t help achieve a pregnancy, fertility specialists could give patients a day off. Sometimes a conversation with our patients about their hopes, fears, expectations, and challenges is the best medicine and can make this challenging time less stressful.

ADVERTISEMENT

As fertility specialists, we encourage both patients and colleagues to start a conversation about what they need and what they don’t. To start that conversation, Choosing Wisely Canada has four critical questions to kick off a conversation:

1. Do I really need this test, treatment, or procedure?
2. What are the downsides?
3. Are there simpler, safer options?
4. What happens if I do nothing?

Claire Jones is a gynecologic reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialist and co-chair, Choosing Wisely working group for the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Eileen McMahon is a nurse practitioner and president, Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

My patient isn't doing well. Is it my fault?

February 18, 2020 Kevin 0
…
Next

What to do with the extremely defensive doctor

February 18, 2020 Kevin 2
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
My patient isn't doing well. Is it my fault?
Next Post >
What to do with the extremely defensive doctor

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Stop stigmatizing medication-assisted treatment

    Brandon Jacobi
  • Hospital administrators thinking about no-cost treatment which really helps patients

    John Corsino, DPT
  • Cutting the red tape with buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder

    Christina Kinnevey, MD
  • How to avoid treatment you don’t need

    Marshall Allen
  • Treating depression with ketamine: We need incremental treatment for depression

    Shaili Jain, MD
  • An expensive treatment may be a victim of its own widening use

    Julie Appleby

More in Conditions

  • Mpox isn’t over: A silent epidemic is growing

    Melvin Sanicas, MD
  • How your family system secretly shapes your health

    Su Yeong Kim, PhD
  • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

    Thomas Amburn, MD
  • Inside the high-stakes world of neurosurgery

    Isaac Yang, MD
  • Why I left the clinic to lead health care from the inside

    Vandana Maurya, MHA
  • One injection dropped LDL by 69 percent. Should we celebrate?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why your clinic waiting room may affect patient outcomes

      Ziya Altug, PT, DPT and Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • The backbone of health care is breaking

      Grace Yu, MD | Physician
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • Why transplant equity requires more than access

      Zamra Amjid, DHSc, MHA | Policy
    • The ethical crossroads of medicine and legislation

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • How robotics are transforming the next generation of vascular care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The high cost of gender inequity in medicine

      Kolleen Dougherty, MD | Physician
    • Mpox isn’t over: A silent epidemic is growing

      Melvin Sanicas, MD | Conditions
    • How your family system secretly shapes your health

      Su Yeong Kim, PhD | Conditions
    • Women physicians: How can they survive and thrive in academic medicine?

      Elina Maymind, MD | Physician
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why your clinic waiting room may affect patient outcomes

      Ziya Altug, PT, DPT and Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • The backbone of health care is breaking

      Grace Yu, MD | Physician
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • Why transplant equity requires more than access

      Zamra Amjid, DHSc, MHA | Policy
    • The ethical crossroads of medicine and legislation

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • How robotics are transforming the next generation of vascular care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The high cost of gender inequity in medicine

      Kolleen Dougherty, MD | Physician
    • Mpox isn’t over: A silent epidemic is growing

      Melvin Sanicas, MD | Conditions
    • How your family system secretly shapes your health

      Su Yeong Kim, PhD | Conditions
    • Women physicians: How can they survive and thrive in academic medicine?

      Elina Maymind, MD | Physician
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...