Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Challenging misconceptions in nursing education

M. Bennet Broner, PhD
Policy
November 10, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

Regressive legislators in a Southwestern state discovered that doctoral-level nursing students, future nurse practitioners at the state university, were receiving education in human sexuality. As watchdogs of public morality, and with a conviction that these students were being educated to “groom” children to become transgender individuals, they did not pause to verify the information, review course materials, or speak with the instructors. Instead, they immediately began complaining to the media about the “wokeness,” “liberal agenda,” and “sinfulness” of the training at a state-funded institution.

The students were required to have prior nursing experience for program acceptance. Did the legislators believe that before entering the doctoral program, the nurses led lives that were entirely sheltered from reality? Were they home-schooled through their BSN, without internet or TV, and whose only human contact was with equally cloistered individuals? Did they ignore or fail to comprehend what the students’ prior work experience included or what their future employment would entail?

These legislators, and far too many others like them at both state and federal levels of government, reside in a fantasy world constructed on three misconceptions. They desire to make this illusionary world a reality, with the certainty that it will make our country a better place to live.

Their first belief is that pre-Revolutionary, North American, religiously-based colonies were rigidly controlled communities of piety and clean living. However, this belief requires either ignorance or denial of history, even that written by religious leaders of the time (e.g., Cotton Mather, Pieter Stuyvesant).

Another conviction is that the pre-Reformation Christian Church dictated a life dedicated to Heaven in Western Europe. This church was powerful and influential, but the basis of this control was not the furtherance of religion, but the attainment of further dominance and wealth for high-ranking churchmen. They used entry into heaven and one’s reward once there as coercive tools over nobles and royalty to attain these goals. Here too, knowledge of, or acceptance of history would demonstrate the falsity of belief in the devotion of the early church to a higher cause.

The third misconception is that the television portrayal in the late 1950s and early 1960s of the ideal family is factual and biblical, though both history and sociology have demonstrated that this family structure rarely, if ever, existed. Patriarchy and the dominance of women have existed almost as long as humanity, but often if the “little woman” remained at home, families would not have survived, and childhood as we know it did not exist for the same reason.

Let us assume, however, that these arbiters of morality are correct and that nurse practitioners should not be taught human sexuality. Would not the same reasoning apply to physicians and mental health professionals? Perhaps this education should be eliminated altogether as inappropriate and unnecessary in a moral culture?

In 1963, for example, when I was in the 10th-grade honors biology, the entire section of our textbook on human reproduction was blacked out, and a children’s book explained that “when a mommy and a daddy love each other very much, a baby happens.” Would we once again limit birth control to married women with their husbands’ approval and treat abortions as something that only happened to “bad” girls, while never acknowledging post-abortion hemorrhages and infections (and deaths) that arose from poorly performed procedures? The idea that married women might use abortion, as did my grandmother, for child spacing would have been too alien to comprehend! In a few states, these individuals have had to define “male” and “female” by state law, as they have found biological explanations inadequate.

For millennia, the estimated lifespan was ±25 years. There were elderly people, those who lived into their 70s-80s, but the average was drastically reduced by horrendously high infant and early childhood mortality rates. Many women also died young in childbirth or shortly thereafter, and polygamy and serial monogamy were common practices. One regressive legislator has even stated that girls between 12-15 were suitable for marriage and pregnancy!

Many regressives have questioned the value of vaccines; not only the recent ones for COVID but also those for childhood communicable diseases. Perhaps they will do away with these as well, and we could welcome back a multitude of contagions that have been greatly diminished, if not eliminated, in the developed world. How many present-day U.S. physicians have treated Diphtheria or Polio? Could we even see the return of Bubonic Plague? Histrionic, possibly, but who expected potentially endemic Leprosy and Dengue Fever in Florida? To these, we could add increasing STIs and HIV. In a regressive world, not only would there be no education on these, but no specialty clinics and likely fewer treatments as well, that likely could only be accessed clandestinely, while more babies would be born with congenital infections and their associated disabilities.

This just scratches the surface, as other aspects of health care would be curtailed as well. Regressives in Congress have discussed reductions in Medicaid and Medicare, and it is possible that employer-based health insurance could be narrowed or eliminated. Certain lines of research and some medical procedures may be reduced or eliminated as immoral. Together, all of these would result in a “sicker” population and increased mortality at younger ages. We could easily regress health care to the level of the late 19th-early 20th century. All in all, I prefer what we have to this nightmare.

M. Bennet Broner is a medical ethicist.

Prev

Life and death in the trauma unit [PODCAST]

November 9, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

From "reverse" to "self" leadership: a journey of survival and thriving

November 10, 2023 Kevin 0
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Life and death in the trauma unit [PODCAST]
Next Post >
From "reverse" to "self" leadership: a journey of survival and thriving

ADVERTISEMENT

More by M. Bennet Broner, PhD

  • Ethical dilemmas in using unclaimed bodies for medical research

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD

Related Posts

  • Medical trainees need knowledge and education on health care systems and policy

    Daniel Arteaga, MD, MBA and Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA
  • 4 significant misconceptions about universal health care systems

    Niran S. Al-Agba, MD
  • Clinicians unite for health care reform

    Leslie Gregory, PA-C
  • The gender imbalance in nursing

    Cole Edmonson, DNP and Paulette Anest, RN
  • Melting the iron triangle: Prioritizing health equity in dynamic, innovative health care landscapes

    Nina Cloven, MHA
  • Navigating mental health challenges in medical education

    Carter Do

More in Policy

  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • How fragmented records and poor tracking degrade patient outcomes

    Michael R. McGuire
  • U.S. health care leadership must prepare for policy-driven change

    Lee Scheinbart, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From stigma to science: Rethinking the U.S. drug scheduling system

      Artin Asadipooya | Meds
    • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

      Max Rollwage, PhD | Tech
    • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

      Allen Fredrickson | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From stigma to science: Rethinking the U.S. drug scheduling system

      Artin Asadipooya | Meds
    • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

      Max Rollwage, PhD | Tech
    • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

      Allen Fredrickson | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...