Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How a systems approach can revolutionize pain and depression treatment

Richard A. Lawhern, PhD
Conditions
January 19, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

As a health care writer and patient advocate for over 27 years, I have interacted with thousands of patients who experience chronic severe pain, caregivers who support struggling family members, and clinicians who treat painful conditions. Depression and anxiety are very common in these patients and may significantly complicate treatment.   Untreated depression – or under-treated pain – can cause increases in healing times, suicidal ideation, and even suicide itself.

On the other hand, we know patients’ expectations that a treatment will help them and may improve some patients’ symptoms even when they are given an inert sugar pill (“placebo effect”). Positive doctor-patient relationships and mutual respect tend to promote better outcomes. Negative relationships are associated with worse outcomes (“nocebo effect”).

Interactions of the human psyche and soma (mind versus body) are a subject of controversy between lay people and clinical professionals. Among pain patients and their health care providers, an important question is, “Does pain cause depression, or is it the other way around?” By extension, “Can pain be reduced by also treating depression or anxiety?” Finally, “Do childhood adverse experiences or emotional trauma cause physical pain in adult life?”

I have found over the decades of my public advocacy that answers to these questions tend to amount to “sometimes for some people …” There is no one-size-fits-all “holistic” therapy for either pain or depression. We’re still learning.

That being said, psychosomatic medicine has come to be recognized in recent years as having a degree of positive validity even while the medical evidence is mixed.   High levels of stress and emotional upset clearly influence physical symptoms and cause observable neurological changes. Sustained high levels of pain may cause sleep disturbances and disrupt family relationships, promoting both chronic depression and higher levels of pain in a spiral of negative effects.

Treatment of pain and depression is complicated by inadequacies in doctor training. One survey of medical school curricula found that the average medical student is exposed to only nine hours of instruction on diagnosis and treatment of pain. Expansion of this exposure must wait for rotations during internship or fellowship programs. And even there, much of what doctors learn about pain, depression, and the risk of painkiller addiction will need to be unlearned later in clinical practice.

I propose that a concept from engineering may offer doctors an organizing framework for better understanding many questions about integrated treatment of pain, depression, and anxiety. This concept is one of “closed-loop control systems.” The mathematics underpinning the concept dates from the late 1860s. Few clinicians are deeply exposed to this approach, though many engineers will immediately recognize it.

In health care systems, the “input” to the system is a multi-element program of therapy intended to treat a disease, disorder, or symptom. The plant” is the mind and body of the patient. “Outputs” are the results of treatment.

What is unique in this concept is the “controller,” the “feedback elements,” and the fact that these elements directly influence the results of treatment in ways that few doctors are taught to recognize. Medical school education, for the most part, addresses only the right-facing arrows in this diagram and often neglects details of the controller block.

The “controller” in pain treatment is a kind of “translator.” For pharmacological treatments, the controller metabolizes pharmaceutical chemicals into simpler sub-components that cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the pain processing centers of the brain. Metabolism also transforms treatments into physical effects felt not only in nerves or the brain but also in hormones, organs, and soft tissues.

A program of psychosomatic medicine or psychological therapy might also pass through its own translator to produce effects in “the plant” (mind, body, or both).

“Feedback elements” are multi-dimensiona,l and observations of the doctor and patient are major components. Is the treatment working? Has the patient’s level of pain or quality of life improved?   If treatment isn’t working, what else can be tried?

The transfer relationships of the controller and plant are not constant.   These functions change both in response to treatment and independently due to the life experiences of the patient and doctor. Some elements of both controller and plant may not be observable; we can only guess what they are and how they operate. Arguably, the best outcomes of both patient-centered medicine and evidence-based medicine are realized when all parties embrace these elements.

ADVERTISEMENT

Note to doctors: hang in here with us. This is complex reading, but there really is a bottom line to the discussion.

To return to the diagram: It cannot be overemphasized that patients themselves are often highly accurate observers of their own outcomes.   What they observe is “fed back” as information to doctors or in their willingness to comply with clinician proposals. Even when the patient is mistaken in their observations, a few questions by the clinician may clarify what is going on. And incidentally, the term “non-compliant” should be avoided at all costs in patient records. It can be a “kiss of death” for effective treatment.

For clinicians, what this means is that you must listen and accord credibility to what the patient says. You can assist them in articulating what they are experiencing. But you discount or distrust their observations to your own and their peril.

When a patient tells us that a past treatment for their pain has been effective — or ineffective — then we need to respect their input unless there is evidence that they misunderstand or are misrepresenting what they experience. When a patient tells us that they are very depressed or anxious, then we need to treat those symptoms aggressively and monitor the patient’s progress not only for pain but also for depression.

Pain and depression are not “fire and forget” targets. Both require ongoing management.

I offer a final thought from my own interactions with patients and caregivers. In 27 years, I have never heard a patient say that their pain was “caused” by their own mental attitude or by early childhood emotional traumas. Even when such factors exist, they do not “cause” pain (although, in some patients, early traumas may complicate later treatment). By contrast, I have many times heard that the refusal of a physician to hear and trust their patient has made the patient’s life much worse.

The systems model for medical treatment offers much value, particularly by reminding us to listen to what patients say and to acknowledge them as participants in their own treatments. Systems thinking also informs us that “It’s all in your head” is never an ethically or clinically correct response to pain.

Richard A. Lawhern is a patient advocate.

Prev

States have the power to influence health care

January 19, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

The heart of family medicine: a doctor's journey of compassion and care

January 19, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Pain Management, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
States have the power to influence health care
Next Post >
The heart of family medicine: a doctor's journey of compassion and care

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Richard A. Lawhern, PhD

  • From Civil War tales to iPhones: a family history in contrast

    Richard A. Lawhern, PhD
  • Why chronic pain patients and doctors are both under attack

    Richard A. Lawhern, PhD
  • The hidden battle of weight loss: Why dieting alone isn’t enough

    Richard A. Lawhern, PhD

Related Posts

  • Think twice before prescribing opioids as a first-line treatment for pain

    Gary Call, MD
  • Merging the wisdom of pain medicine and addiction medicine to optimize outcomes

    Julie Craig, MD
  • Are clinicians complicit in the Fentanyl epidemic?

    Janet Tamaren, MD
  • The preference for insurance coverage of opioids over non-pharmaceutical options explained

    Amy Baxter, MD
  • Cannabis compounds in fracture pain relief and healing

    L. Joseph Parker, MD
  • Why doctors risk jail time to treat pain and addiction

    L. Joseph Parker, MD

More in Conditions

  • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

    Adeel Khan, MD
  • Apprenticeship reshapes medical training for confident clinicians

    Claude E. Lett III, PA-C
  • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

    Dr. Vishal Parackal
  • My improbable survival of stage 4 cancer

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • The truth about sun exposure: What dermatologists want you to know

    Shafat Hassan, MD, PhD, MPH
  • How a South Asian nurse challenged stereotypes in health care

    Viksit Bali, RN
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How hospitals can prepare for CMS’s new patient safety rule

      Kim Adelman, PhD | Conditions
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Apprenticeship reshapes medical training for confident clinicians

      Claude E. Lett III, PA-C | Conditions
    • How American medicine profits from despair

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Policy
    • How market forces fracture millennial physicians’ careers

      Shannon Meron, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How hospitals can prepare for CMS’s new patient safety rule

      Kim Adelman, PhD | Conditions
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Apprenticeship reshapes medical training for confident clinicians

      Claude E. Lett III, PA-C | Conditions
    • How American medicine profits from despair

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Policy
    • How market forces fracture millennial physicians’ careers

      Shannon Meron, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...