Ask physicians why they don’t hand off more of the paperwork burying their day, and the answer comes fast. No time to train anyone. Not enough staff. The EHR fights it. All fair. Those are the reasons that surface when a practice sits down and asks why everyone’s stretched so thin.
There’s another reason on that list, though. Lower down. The one nobody says with the door open.
When the AMA asked physicians in 2023 what really stopped them from delegating administrative work, the answers ranked about how you’d expect:
- Not enough medical assistants or nurses: 50.1 percent
- Institutional culture or policy: 44.3 percent
- The EHR isn’t built for it: 30.7 percent
- Don’t trust their staff to do the work reliably: 19.3 percent
That last one is a different kind of problem. A staffing gap you can hire against. Not trusting the people already at your front desk is something else entirely.
Real physician voices, twice a week
Free, and one click to unsubscribe.
Where the distrust comes from
The instinct is trained. Medicine teaches you to be the last check on everything, because for years you were the last thing standing between a mistake and a patient. That caution is the point of the training. It just doesn’t switch off when the task stops being clinical.
You can see it in the same AMA data. In roughly two-thirds of practices, prior authorizations get handled by someone other than the doctor most of the time. Entering diagnostic orders? That gets delegated in fewer than one in five.
But prior auth is tedious, judgment-free grunt work, and an order is a couple of clicks after the decision’s already made. Neither needs a medical degree. One gets released and the other gets held, so the sorting isn’t really about clinical judgment. It’s about which tasks sit close enough to a decision that letting go feels like negligence.
So the barrier isn’t distrust of a person. It’s distrust of the distance between yourself and the work. And the caution behind it is the same caution that catches the interaction nobody else flagged, which is why telling physicians to simply delegate more falls flat. You’re asking them to be worse at the part of the job that counts.
What it looks like in a real week
It looks like re-checking a schedule someone already confirmed. Redoing an eligibility check that was probably fine. A note left open because only you can finalize it, and you won’t get to it until the last patient’s gone. A staffer waiting on your sign-off for something routine, because the one time they moved without asking, you wished they hadn’t.
None of it is a crisis. That’s what makes it hard to catch. Each instance is small enough to absorb, so you absorb it, then the next one, and the day ends at the kitchen table with the charts still open. The tasks that pushed your evening back weren’t the clinical ones. They were the ones you couldn’t hand off.
You already trust people you never vetted
And here’s the strange part. Most of the trust you extend in a day, you didn’t build yourself. You trust a partner’s read on a scan because a residency, a board, and years of supervised training already vetted them. You trust a pharmacist’s catch on an interaction for the same reason. You never ran those checks. Someone else did, long before that person crossed your path, and you inherited the trust already formed.
That’s the model that actually works. The proving happens somewhere upstream, done by people whose job is to do it, and what reaches you has already cleared the bar. You’re not extending blind faith. You’re relying on vetting that happened elsewhere.
A new admin hire arrives with none of that. Nobody proved them against your workflows before day one, so the whole job of watching and correcting and confirming lands on you, wedged between patients, which means it lands nowhere. So you check everything yourself, month after month, and file it under “short-staffed” when the headcount was never the issue.
The trap this sets
Here’s why it never breaks on its own. The checking feels responsible; every task you review is one that won’t come back wrong, so holding on always looks like the safe call in the moment. But the proving that would let you loosen your grip takes time you don’t have. So it never happens, so you keep checking, which is the exact bottleneck you were trying to escape. Every safe-feeling choice pulls the knot tighter, and working harder inside it changes nothing.
The question worth asking instead
The usual advice here is to let go and trust your team. It’s useless because it treats a structural problem like a personality one. You don’t have a control issue. You have a setup where the only person who could build the trust is the one with no time to build it.
So the sharper question isn’t how to fit in training for one more hire. It’s whether the proving has to happen inside your clinic at all. Every other kind of trust you rely on was established before the person ever reached you, none of it on your schedule or your patients’ time.
A growing number of practices have started applying that logic to the administrative side. Rather than hire someone raw and prove them out between appointments, they bring in support that’s already been vetted, trained on medical workflows, and managed by someone whose job is holding the quality line. The person arrives past the point of needing to be watched. Whether that fits your practice takes real thought. The compliance piece alone rules out a lot of options, since anyone touching patient data has to sign a BAA and handle PHI correctly.
But the shift underneath is the part worth keeping. The goal was never to get better at watching your staff. It was to stop being the one the watching depends on.
Karan Kanwar is the CEO of Central AI and Wing Assistant. Central AI provides an AI operating system for appointment-driven medical practices, handling calls, texts, web chat, and messages around the clock, qualifying patients and booking appointments directly into a practice’s existing systems. It is HIPAA compliant and designed to complement the tools practices already use.
Wing Assistant pairs that technology with skilled virtual assistants who take on the administrative work that pulls teams away from patient care. Kanwar writes on where automation and human support meet in health care operations, and how practice leaders can adopt both effectively. He shares updates on LinkedIn.
