Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

An annual checkup on the Affordable Care Act

David B. Nash, MD, MBA
Policy
December 12, 2011
Share
Tweet
Share

As we approach the end of what has been another roller-coaster year for our country, it seems an appropriate time for an “annual checkup” on healthcare reform in the U.S.

Like many of my colleagues, I have followed the implementation of the monumental Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) with great interest, mild trepidation, and a small measure of optimism.

It’s hard to believe that almost two years have flown by since the passage of this historic, game-changing legislation that will influence how healthcare is delivered and reimbursed in the U.S. for decades to come.

Although debates will continue to rage about the law and its sweeping array of mandates, the ACA and the overwhelming majority of its provisions are likely here to stay.

The popular media tends to focus on the “chief complaints” — a few hot-button issues such as “death panels” and the significant number of state-sponsored challenges to the legality and “constitutionality” of some of the law’s provisions.

However, in the course of a comprehensive “annual physical” exam, it is clear that a surprisingly large number of the law’s provisions have already gone into effect — smoothly and as planned across the entire industry.

Here are just a few …

In the first year (2010), insurers complied with a variety of new requirements, including increased mandatory reporting of administrative data, continued coverage of children under their parents’ policies until the 26th birthday, strict limits on reasons for discontinuing coverage, and free preventive screening services for adults.

Nonprofit insurers faced a new requirement that they maintain a loss ratio of 85% or higher in the large group market and 80% or higher in the small markets in order to take advantage of Internal Revenue Service tax benefits.

Other provisions that went into effect in 2010 included new tax credits available to small businesses (25 or fewer employees) to help with employee premium costs and the expansion of Medicare to small, rural hospitals and facilities.

In January of this year, Medicare beneficiaries began to receive free preventive care as well as a 50% discount on the cost of covered brand-name prescription drugs to tighten the Medicare Part D coverage gap (doughnut hole), and grants became available to states to develop programs aimed at delaying the onset and reducing the prevalence of chronic conditions in their Medicaid populations.

Hospitals also began to feel the impact of ACA this year when the federal government stopped paying states for Medicaid services related to certain hospital-acquired infections – a prelude to the planned reduction in Medicare payments for preventable hospital admissions scheduled to take effect in 2012.

Some of the states that have mounted legal challenges over certain aspects of the law have begun to take action on others; for instance, Pennsylvania’s Republican governor recently got the ball rolling on the insurance exchange component.

On the policy front, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services met its deadline for developing the CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, the body that will oversee testing of innovative payment and delivery models such as bundled payments for care improvement models, the comprehensive primary care initiative, and Partnerships for Patients.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although all of this suggests that the general health of healthcare reform is in pretty good shape, the coming year brings a lot of uncertainty.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide on a course of treatment for at least one nagging problem — the individual mandate – that may include surgical excision.

The 2012 elections could result in power shifts that may affect the law’s “mortality” (i.e., efforts to repeal the entire law) or, at the very least, its “morbidity” (i.e., efforts to limit funding for the implementation of certain provisions).

On Dec. 2, Donald Berwick, MD, left the helm of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and many in the health reform movement mourned the loss of a leader often described as a visionary.

Dr. Berwick has been open about his failures and frustrations as well as his successes in trying to engineer a rapid transformation of the healthcare system while warding off political attacks from various quarters.

What can we expect from his likely successor, Marilyn Tavenner?

Ms. Tavenner has risen through the ranks from nurse to CEO to a regional executive for HCA and the second in command at CMS.

Writing for HealthLeaders Media, John Commins suggests that she might be the “anti-Berwick” – a more “practical-minded,” “consensus-building” leader. But that remains to be seen.

Tune in next year for another update.

David B. Nash is Founding Dean of the Jefferson School of Population Health at Thomas Jefferson University and blogs at Nash on Health Policy.

Originally published in MedPage Today. Visit MedPageToday.com for more health policy news.

Prev

Why the future of the American medical profession is looking good

December 12, 2011 Kevin 19
…
Next

Should you consider genetic testing?

December 12, 2011 Kevin 6
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why the future of the American medical profession is looking good
Next Post >
Should you consider genetic testing?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by David B. Nash, MD, MBA

  • Does the House of God stand the test of time?

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Nonprofit hospitals: The potential for conflict of interest is huge

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Quality measures benefit from quality improvement

    David B. Nash, MD, MBA

More in Policy

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

    Holland Haynie, MD
  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

An annual checkup on the Affordable Care Act
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...