Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Should primary care limit its scope of work?

Joshua Freeman, MD
Physician
May 6, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

The shortage of primary care physicians in the U.S. has become a national theme. A common proposed solution to this shortage – and a central component of the patient centered medical home – is team-based care that utilizes various non-physician health care professionals as well as electronic communication. The idea is that many functions carried out by physicians can be done by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and others on the health care team, and many problems that now require trips to the doctor’s office could be addressed by phone, email or web-based visits.

In a recent issue of Health Affairs, Green, et al., use computer simulation models to estimate the number of patients a doctor could care for with the employment of such techniques and by sharing patients among a group of doctors. These statistical models estimate that patients’ ability to access care would be dramatically increased by such policies.

These approaches provide a more efficient model of primary care practice that would help to address the primary care physician shortage. Indeed, these approaches utilize the “crisis” to actually improve both access to and quality of care. There are, however, challenges to implementation of this model. One is payment. While it is possible to restructure practices to achieve these advantages, this is most effective in settings in which the provider is also the insurer, like Kaiser. In parts of the country where this model is less prevalent, where most payment is “fee for service” for face-to-face visits with doctors, there is not only no incentive to change, there is a large financial disincentive since any non-face-to-face care is essentially given out free.

A second challenge is that such models only work where there is a large enough concentration of patients and providers to achieve the benefits of scale. As with most such analyses, Green’s leaves out the needs of rural populations. Some large systems, such as Geisinger in Pennsylvania, have been successful in creating such efficiencies in their clinics in rural areas, but there are not many like Geisinger. Like Kaiser, it is a financially integrated system, and it works in a relatively densely populated rural area of northeastern Pennsylvania, not a vast empty Western frontier county.

It’s interesting that so much of this emphasis on efficiencies, and particularly the use of non-physician professionals, has been on primary care. This is due in part to the need for primary care in all settings, while much specialty care can be centralized in larger cities. There is also not a shortage of many non-primary-care specialists since medical students gravitate to subspecialties in far greater numbers than to primary care. Besides the larger salaries of subspecialists, many argue that the more regular work hours and limited scope of work make subspecialties more attractive.

The limited scope of work – although not, necessarily, less difficult work, especially when considering surgical interventions – also makes subspecialties, in many ways, more appropriate fields in which to use non-physician professionals than primary care. This is the reverse of the usual assumption that sub-specialists see difficult problems, while primary care providers mostly treat colds and check blood pressure. In fact, primary care is complex, as it sees both undifferentiated patients and those with multiple chronic diseases. Most specialty care is more routine, treating a much more limited set of diagnoses with a more limited set of interventions. For the typical subspecialist, fewer than a half dozen diagnoses may account for 80 percent of visits, while for a family doctor, the top 20 diagnoses account for only about 30 percent of visits. Thus, the breadth of knowledge and skills used to make complex decisions and appropriately prioritize problems requires a level of sophistication and training not taught to or developed in most other health care professions – with the exception of family nurse practitioners whose training does provide this to some degree. It is then unsurprising that most of the tasks suggested for nurses and others to increase the efficiency of primary care practices have limited scope: maintaining disease registries, calling for recommended preventive care, screening a small set of diagnoses.

This type of narrow, in-depth scope of work is much more characteristic of subspecialty care, and it is one of the reasons why expanded-scope nurses and physician assistants have found so much use in these practices. They follow people with congestive heart failure for cardiologists or diabetes for endocrinologists; they manage chemotherapy recipients for oncologists; they use algorithms to care for people in intensive care units; they do pre- and post-operative care for orthopedists and other surgeons. And they do not go outside of the set of diagnoses and treatment options with which they are familiar. Following the model of the physicians with whom they work, when a patient’s problem is not in their narrow area, it is referred.

The targeted but limited expertise of such nurse specialists explains why they function so well in subspecialties. What explains why it works financially is that the doctors, hospitals, or health systems that employ them are reimbursed at subspecialist physician rates for work that is done by others; thus, they can afford to pay such “physician extenders” relatively well compared to folks working in primary care. Reimbursement for “teams” follows the model of reimbursement for physicians: care for a limited set of diagnoses in a detailed way, especially when it involves procedures, is paid much better than management of complex sets of interactive diagnoses.

Unfortunately, the challenge with such practice is that the same person often has multiple conditions, and interventions that help one may make another worse. While efforts to build teams, and have each professional work at the top of his or her license, are important, so is payment. As long as primary care is reimbursed at lower rates, it will continue to face challenges in recruitment of physicians, nurses, and other team members.  Yes, we need to develop and implement great strategies for team-based care, but we also need to dramatically decrease the ratio of income for subspecialists and their subspecialist teams relative to those working in primary care.

This is adapted from a post that originally appeared on Dr. Freeman’s blog, Medicine and Social Justice.

Joshua Freeman is chair, Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine.  He blogs at Primary Care Progress.

Prev

Female feticide: The ethical issues of ultrasound in India and China

May 6, 2013 Kevin 21
…
Next

Reflections on medical education, medical practice and the underserved

May 6, 2013 Kevin 16
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Female feticide: The ethical issues of ultrasound in India and China
Next Post >
Reflections on medical education, medical practice and the underserved

ADVERTISEMENT

More in Physician

  • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why working in Hawai’i health care isn’t all paradise

    Clayton Foster, MD
  • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • How veteran health care is being transformed by tech and teamwork

      Deborah Lafer Scher | Conditions
    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Should primary care limit its scope of work?
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...