Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

“Studies show”: It’s time to ban the term

Brian J. Secemsky, MD
Education
September 19, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

We’ve gone through four dreadful pre-medical years of learning everything from the composition of atoms to how an apple exerts force when falling off a tree.  We’ve taken a massive exam full of content mostly unrelated to our future field only to be put through four more years of intense medical education (and several additional massive exams).  We’ve managed to receive a medical degree and have gone through at least some postgraduate training.

We’ve gone through too much academic rigor to sell ourselves short.

So when I hear medical trainees in passing debating clinical management or listen in on a young clinic doc explaining treatment options to a mutual patient, I cannot help but cringe every time I overhear the phrase “studies show.”

Said together, these two words should be banned from medical vernacular.

The problem

When using this lackluster phrase, the clinician is declaring the following: “There may be a study out there that I haven’t read or critically analyzed that may or may not pertain to you and your specific health issues.”

Simply put, it’s poor form.

Medical professionals in our field need to do better in communicating our confidence (or lack thereof) when questioned on why we decide to do the things we do.  If a patient or colleague questions a clinical assessment, we should be clear on how we have come to our conclusions.

If we’ve read evidence supporting our management decisions, let’s own it by truly referring to the literature.  But if we are only vaguely aware of research that supports a questioned decision without first taking time to read the evidence and/or supporting editorials and guidelines, let us not sugar-coat our lack of due diligence.

For not all evidence is good evidence.

Published clinical studies may have poor methodology, relate to a different cohort than the patient being cared for or may be superseded by more compelling evidence that demonstrates different outcomes.

By simply declaring that “studies” support our clinical decisions, we run the risk of being misleading to both our patients and our colleagues.

The solution

There are simple and much more honest ways of communicating our clinical reasoning when being questioned by those around us.

Whether we like it or not, many medical decisions made daily by clinicians are not evidence-based but rather learned through training and experience.  When patients or colleagues question a medical decision of mine that has not been subject rigorously study, I often refer to my medical training as the guiding source of my clinical judgment.  More seasoned clinicians may similarly use their extensive clinical experience as reasonable justification.

It is impossible to read every journal article, and excessive for one to expect all physicians to be reputable experts in critically appraising clinical research.  So when I have skimmed an abstract of a specific study published in a highly regarded medical journal, I am not afraid to bring up its existence and the possibility of it supporting my medical decisions.  But I am equally careful not to overstate the extent of my knowledge, and often will return to the literature before furthering a discussion with a patient or colleague.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take home point

Those of us in the medical field have worked incredibly hard to get to where we are today.  We’ve successfully tackled an entire new language full of medical jargon and have crammed our heads full of medical knowledge.

We are good at what we do, but we are not experts in every aspect of clinical research.

So let us all stay candid when defending our clinical reasoning by knocking out ambiguous and potentially misleading phrases such as “studies show.”

Brian J. Secemsky is an internal medicine resident who blogs at the Huffington Post.  He can be reached on Twitter @BrianSecemskyMD and his self-titled site, Brian Secemsky MD.  This article originally appeared LeadDoc.

Prev

Two women, two cancers, two different pathways

September 19, 2014 Kevin 0
…
Next

Ebola needs an ice bucket challenge

September 19, 2014 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Medical school

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Two women, two cancers, two different pathways
Next Post >
Ebola needs an ice bucket challenge

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Brian J. Secemsky, MD

  • Discussing the side effects of medications: How can doctors do better?

    Brian J. Secemsky, MD
  • Why physicians should be trained for in-flight emergencies

    Brian J. Secemsky, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The challenge of evidence-based medicine to the new physician

    Brian J. Secemsky, MD

More in Education

  • Why doctors need emotional literacy training

    Vineet Vishwanath
  • A simple 10-10-10 tool to prevent burnout through mindfulness

    Annabelle Bailey
  • How racism and policy failures shape reproductive health in America

    Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta
  • Imagining a career path beyond medicine and its impact

    Hunter Delmoe
  • What is professional identity formation in medicine?

    Adrian Reynolds, PhD
  • How Filipino cultural values shape silence around mental health

    Victor Fu and Charmaigne Lopez
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • IMGs are the future of U.S. primary care

      Adam Brandon Bondoc, MD | Physician
    • From nurse practitioner to leader in quality improvement [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The crushing bureaucracy that’s driving independent physicians to extinction

      Scott Tzorfas, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Healing from medical training by learning to trust your body again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How tragedy shaped a medical career

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A doctor’s guide to preparing for your death

      Joseph Pepe, MD | Physician
    • Coconut oil’s role in Alzheimer’s and depression

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How policy and stigma block addiction treatment

      Mariana Ndrio, MD | Physician
    • Unused IV catheters cost U.S. hospitals billions

      Piyush Pillarisetti | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • IMGs are the future of U.S. primary care

      Adam Brandon Bondoc, MD | Physician
    • From nurse practitioner to leader in quality improvement [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The crushing bureaucracy that’s driving independent physicians to extinction

      Scott Tzorfas, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Healing from medical training by learning to trust your body again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How tragedy shaped a medical career

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A doctor’s guide to preparing for your death

      Joseph Pepe, MD | Physician
    • Coconut oil’s role in Alzheimer’s and depression

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How policy and stigma block addiction treatment

      Mariana Ndrio, MD | Physician
    • Unused IV catheters cost U.S. hospitals billions

      Piyush Pillarisetti | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

“Studies show”: It’s time to ban the term
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...