Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why do some health systems fail? There are 2 reasons why.

Marc-David Munk, MD
Policy
October 17, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

Around the country, for every health system that is successfully navigating the early years of value-based health care, there are several others that are failing — even though many don’t yet realize it.   These failing organizationscan’t or won’t restructure themselves to deliver effective, efficient and affordable care.

I’ve come to the conclusion, after observing struggling systems, that two basic characteristics are necessary for systems to transform themselves in response to external pressures: execution and motivation. Successful systems have both of these characteristics in spades: Failing systems suffer from an absence of one or both.

I refer to motivation as a system’s willingness to change: to recognize the need for transformation in the face of external pressures and to move with a sense of urgency.

Execution, on the other hand, is the health system’s ability to get stuff done. It describes how good a company is at setting priorities and accomplishing what it sets out to do. Systems that execute well complete important tasks. Those that execute poorly (or execute the wrong things) stagnate, flailing as they try to get unstuck.

You can plot these two characteristics as a grid.

slide11
Health system responses to health care reform: Successful systems benefit from high motivation and ability to execute. Failing systems fall into three distinct outlier quadrants.

My sense is that most successful systems sit higher than average on both of these two characteristics. These are systems that understand the need for change, are deliberative and thoughtful about planning strategies/ partnerships, and don’t waste time on unimportant work. They know how to prioritize. When they do decide to implement change, their execution is flawless: initiatives are well conceived and they accomplish what they set out to do.

On the other hand, systems that struggle with motivation or execution sit, I think, in three distinct outlying quadrants:

1. “The whistlers at the graveyard” (low in motivation, strong in execution). These are generally systems that are doing well in their daily operations, but are unable to meaningfully embrace long term change. Things are “fine” as they are. Usually these are well reimbursed mega-systems with strong physician cultures. They resist risk contracts and the development of ambulatory or lower-cost service lines because they feel that they have their geographic markets cornered — and can leverage payers to maintain the status quo. Their strategy is to kick the can down the road despite worrisome trends such in the insurance market such as high deductible and employer to worker subsidies.

2. “The too-little-too-lates” (low in motivation, poor at execution). These are often academic medical centers or safety net hospital systems that are paralyzed by infighting and bureaucratic overhead. They are unable to align their academic and clinical missions and struggle to improve care, access or customer satisfaction. They look at health reform as an abstract concern but feel reassured that regardless of what happens, they are too big or important to fail and that they will get a break due to the difficult patients that they serve. These systems are often filled by demotivated staff who regularly launch initiatives that go nowhere.

3. “The wheeler-dealers” (high in motivation, poor at execution). These are usually systems that are very concerned about health reform but are are not large or wealthy enough to build the infrastructure and analytics they need to manage risk. They ultimately spend a lot of time purchasing one-off services from healthcare IT/analytics vendors, cobbling together various back-office components and making deals with independent physicians. They are often trying new limited risk-assumption pilots with insurance companies but are on the razors edge when it comes to keeping an adequately sized risk-pool of patients.  Their Achilles’ heel is the amount of time they spend on small deals rather than the large affiliations that would lead to meaningful progress.

It will be interesting to see how these three outlier groups fare over the next several years. We’ve already begun witnessing an range of mergers and acquisitions, many fueled I think, by outlying quadrant groups integrating with more capable systems. This trend may only grow with time.

Marc-David Munk is chief medical officer, Reliant Medical Group. He blogs at Considering American Healthcare.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

We can make a difference: Lessons from the Buckyballs recall

October 17, 2014 Kevin 0
…
Next

My son depends on herd immunity, so thanks for getting your flu shot

October 17, 2014 Kevin 2
…

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
We can make a difference: Lessons from the Buckyballs recall
Next Post >
My son depends on herd immunity, so thanks for getting your flu shot

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Marc-David Munk, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Patients should not have to advocate for their own safety

    Marc-David Munk, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    What Apple can teach health care: Hire unorthodox applicants

    Marc-David Munk, MD
  • How to improve doctor-administrator relations

    Marc-David Munk, MD

More in Policy

  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why ADHD in women is finally getting the attention it deserves

      Arti Lal, MD | Conditions
    • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Why ruling out sepsis in emergency departments can be lifesaving

      Claude M. D'Antonio, Jr., MD | Conditions
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Rethinking patient payments: Why billing is the new frontline of patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why great patient outcomes don’t protect female doctors from burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why ADHD in women is finally getting the attention it deserves

      Arti Lal, MD | Conditions
    • How a $75 million jet brought down America’s boldest doctor

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Why ruling out sepsis in emergency departments can be lifesaving

      Claude M. D'Antonio, Jr., MD | Conditions
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why do some health systems fail? There are 2 reasons why.
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...