Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Surprise! When it comes to a vaginal hysterectomy, this insurance company gets it right.

Jennifer Gunter, MD
Conditions
March 16, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

The preferred route for a hysterectomy is vaginal. This means the entire surgery is done through the vagina with no incisions in the abdomen of any kind. The joke among surgeons is that it is a bit like taking a car apart through the muffler. While doing surgery entirely through the vagina may sound highly complex, it’s really just like any surgery. A vaginal hysterectomy done correctly it is an elegant, neat procedure with excellent safety and very quick recovery. If I needed a hysterectomy and I was a candidate (most women are) I would choose a vaginal hysterectomy.

But don’t take my word for it. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also says that vaginal hysterectomy is the route of choice (for noncancer surgery). They also agree with the science that says not only is it the safest (or as safe) as any other route but also the least expensive. Most patients who have vaginal hysterectomy are able to go home the next day and the recovery is typically very smooth. In my personal experience patients are amazed at how quickly they recover.

Despite the mountain of evidence-based medicine supporting vaginal hysterectomy and the recommendations from ACOG many hysterectomies are not performed this way. A lot of surgeons opt for the far more expensive approach using laparoscopic surgery (operating telescopes), some also use a robot to assist with their laparoscopic technique (even more expensive), and a few still opt for traditional open surgery (think big scar, like a C-section).

Why would surgeons choose a more expensive and not better by any medical metric approach?

Some of it is because they were swayed by the manufacturers of laparoscopic equipment or the DaVinci gang (the laparoscopic robot folks). Once you exclusively do a surgery one way for many years, you lose skills.

Some doctors never learn to do vaginal hysterectomies. Don’t really know why that happens, but it’s probably a failing of many residencies. I had done far more than 100 when I finished my 5-year residency, today’s graduates (for a variety or reasons) are probably lucky to have done 10. Most urogynecologists (gynecologists who do an additional three years of training) are very skilled in vaginal hysterectomy.

Some doctors never master laparoscopic surgery without the aid of the robot and often these surgeons never mastered vaginal surgery either, or they abandoned vaginal surgery because they were desperate to accumulate laparoscopic cases to practice with the robot.

Some (most) hospitals push their robot, after all they have to pay for it. Robots add a lot of expense to gynecologic surgery with zero return. But hey, marketing departments love robots. They are so cool. And a lot of doctors start to believe their own hype that robots + them = awesome.

Some doctors erroneously think that leaving behind the cervix after a hysterectomy confers some health advantages (the cervix has to come out with a vaginal hysterectomy). Sigh.

Whatever the reason for not being able to do a vaginal hysterectomy, skills or a failure to understand the medical evidence or the lure of cool toys or fancy marketing, some surgeons don’t want to refer to a surgeon who can do a vaginal hysterectomy because of lost money or a perceived loss of prestige.

It really doesn’t surprise me that UnitedHealth announced they plan to preferentially pay for vaginal hysterectomies which are less expensive and at least as good if not better than other approaches. A hysterectomy not done vaginally after April 6th under their health plan will require prior authorization. How smoothly that will go remains to be seen.

Some of this may be a backlash against power morcellators (devices that used through an operating telescope that chop the uterus into tiny pieces so it can be removed laparoscopically), but regardless of the reason I applaud the decision (and am frankly a little surprised that it took this long). If your surgeon won’t or can’t do the recommended technique (vaginal hysterectomy), she or he should have to explain why the procedure requires a nonvaginal route. Some reasons are legitimate (for example, a uterus the size of a 30 week pregnancy can’t really be done vaginally), however, if you take cancer out of the picture more often than not a hysterectomy can be done vaginally by a surgeon who is well-trained to do the procedure.

If gynecologists can’t do the right thing and their professional society can’t convince them to do the right thing they should not be surprised when a third party steps in and helps to point them in the right direction.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s just a sad day for gynecology when doing the right thing requires nudging from an insurance company.

Jennifer Gunter is an obstetrician-gynecologist and author of The Preemie Primer. She blogs at her self-titled site, Dr. Jen Gunter.

Prev

Patient expectations lead to unhealthy relationships with doctors

March 16, 2015 Kevin 90
…
Next

A phrase as a metaphor for dying itself

March 16, 2015 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Patient expectations lead to unhealthy relationships with doctors
Next Post >
A phrase as a metaphor for dying itself

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Jennifer Gunter, MD

  • The Ellen Show broadcasts potentially harmful information about ovarian cancer screening

    Jennifer Gunter, MD
  • Dear science: an appreciation

    Jennifer Gunter, MD
  • Are there too many female OB/GYNs?

    Jennifer Gunter, MD

More in Conditions

  • Why our health system fails chronic disease patients

    Kinan Muhammed, MD
  • AI moderation of online health communities

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Why doctors must fight misinformation online

    Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed
  • A urologist’s perspective on presidential health transparency

    William Lynes, MD
  • The science of hydration: milk vs. sports drinks

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Why caring for a parent is hard for doctors

    Barbara Sparacino, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A doctor’s letter from a federal prison

      L. Joseph Parker, MD | Physician
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • A surgeon’s view on RVUs and moral injury

      Rene Loyola, MD | Physician
    • The link between financial literacy and physician burnout

      Hayley Gates & Ketan Kulkarni, MD | Finance
    • A doctor’s tribute to her father

      Manisha Ghimire, MD | Physician
    • How early intervention and team-based care can change kidney disease outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • The silent disease causing 400 amputations daily

      Xzabia Caliste, MD | Conditions
    • The measure of a doctor, the misery of a patient

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How early intervention and team-based care can change kidney disease outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why our health system fails chronic disease patients

      Kinan Muhammed, MD | Conditions
    • AI moderation of online health communities

      Kathleen Muldoon, PhD | Conditions
    • Why physicians need a personal CFO and how tax mitigation fits in

      Erik Brenner, CFP | Finance
    • Why doctors must fight misinformation online

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • A urologist’s perspective on presidential health transparency

      William Lynes, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A doctor’s letter from a federal prison

      L. Joseph Parker, MD | Physician
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • A surgeon’s view on RVUs and moral injury

      Rene Loyola, MD | Physician
    • The link between financial literacy and physician burnout

      Hayley Gates & Ketan Kulkarni, MD | Finance
    • A doctor’s tribute to her father

      Manisha Ghimire, MD | Physician
    • How early intervention and team-based care can change kidney disease outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • The silent disease causing 400 amputations daily

      Xzabia Caliste, MD | Conditions
    • The measure of a doctor, the misery of a patient

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How early intervention and team-based care can change kidney disease outcomes [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why our health system fails chronic disease patients

      Kinan Muhammed, MD | Conditions
    • AI moderation of online health communities

      Kathleen Muldoon, PhD | Conditions
    • Why physicians need a personal CFO and how tax mitigation fits in

      Erik Brenner, CFP | Finance
    • Why doctors must fight misinformation online

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • A urologist’s perspective on presidential health transparency

      William Lynes, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Surprise! When it comes to a vaginal hysterectomy, this insurance company gets it right.
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...