Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The public charge rule crosses the line, and doctors need to push back

Susannah Hills, MD
Policy
October 4, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

An impossible choice: your child’s health or your child’s future.

This is the choice being posed to immigrant families with the proposed changes to the public charge rule.  These changes would make those using government aid — such as food stamps, housing assistance, or Medicaid — less likely to be granted a green card.  Under this rule, immigrant families will need to decide whether to choose health care coverage over better chances of citizenship.

Physicians are faced with a choice, too: Speak up or give up.

Give up our right to give the very best care that we can.  Give up our commitment to serve those most in need.  Give up the freedom to be the best versions of our physician-selves.

The public charge rule isn’t just about immigrants; it’s about doctors.  And it’s time to speak up.

As a pediatric airway/ENT surgeon in New York City, over half of my patients come from immigrant families.  Many of them get their health care coverage through Medicaid.

Navigating the health care system is not easy for immigrants.  There are barriers of language, transportation, and finances. Yet the love of migrant parents is ultimately what gets children the health care they need.

The proposed changes to the public charge rule pose a very real risk that fear and confusion will lead families to decline benefits their children are entitled to.  A July 2019 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association states that 0.8 to 1.9 million children are at risk of losing government-supported health care benefits.  Findings were based on the widespread disenrollment that occurred after changes were made to Medicaid eligibility in 1996.

Many parents risk their lives to get their children to this country for a better life.  And they fight tirelessly to give their children the best future possible.

One of my patients — a 12-year-old girl from the Dominican Republic — has recurrent airway tumors that require surgery every few months.  Her father stays up after his night shift has ended to bring his daughter to see me.  She has been in the United States for two years and doesn’t have her papers yet.

If she loses her Medicaid coverage, how will we continue to take care of the tumors before they become so big that she can’t breathe?

But the changes to the public charge rule aren’t a loss just for immigrants.  We all will lose.  Immigrants will lose access to routine primary health care.  This will mean an increased burden for emergency rooms and public hospitals for preventable conditions.

This also means greater risk that immigrant children won’t receive vaccinations.  Immigrants being targeted are currently among the most likely to vaccinate.  According to a CATO Institute analysis of WHO statistics from 2017, many countries in Central and South America, including Mexico, have higher vaccinations rates than we do in the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

Loss of Medicaid could lower vaccination rates among migrant communities, placing unvaccinated immigrants at risk for illness.  Entire communities may be at risk for outbreaks of preventable diseases like the measles.

Failure to vaccinate also means loss of access to education.  All 50 states require vaccination for school entry.  Not only could children’s health be at risk, but their right to education is on the line.

As of August 20, a total of 19 states and Washington D.C. have filed suits against the public charge rule.  Numerous community and advocacy groups have filed suits as well.

There is opposition in medicine also, but we need to do more.  Six national professional organizations on the front lines of primary care — including the American College of Physicians — put out a joint statement opposing the rule on August 13.  We surgeons should follow their example.  And we shouldn’t stop until every professional organization in health care has rejected the public charge rule.

We must stand up for the right of every human being to access health care, and we must stand up for our right as providers to treat those most in need of our care.

The public charge rule crosses the line.  Now it’s our turn to push back.

Susannah Hills is an otolaryngologist.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Why this doctor was so uncomfortable arguing with another physician

October 3, 2019 Kevin 4
…
Next

What it means to be an attending physician

October 4, 2019 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy, Washington Watch

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why this doctor was so uncomfortable arguing with another physician
Next Post >
What it means to be an attending physician

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Susannah Hills, MD

  • Inadequate COVID testing leaves New York City schools vulnerable

    Susannah Hills, MD

Related Posts

  • Why do doctors who hate being doctors still practice?

    Kristin Puhl, MD
  • Doctors: It’s time to unionize

    Thomas D. Guastavino, MD
  • Low income is a neglected public health issue

    Vania Silva
  • Our public health efforts depend on flexibility and trust

    John Connolly
  • Why working at polling locations is good public health

    Rob Palmer, Isaac Freedman, and Josh Hyman
  • The public health solution to gun deaths

    Nancy Dodson, MD, MPH, Jeffrey Oestreicher, MD and Nina Agrawal, MD

More in Policy

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

    Holland Haynie, MD
  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 6 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The public charge rule crosses the line, and doctors need to push back
6 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...