Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Unethical policy: Resuming federal lethal injections during a global pandemic

Charles E. Binkley, MD
Policy
July 21, 2020
Share
Tweet
Share

The United States government has resumed capital punishment after a 17-year hiatus. Even setting aside questions of whether the death penalty is legal, ethical, or humane, the renewal of the practice of lethal injection poses some grave concerns, particularly in the context of the global pandemic. According to Department of Justice documents, the government is using the drug pentobarbital to carry out the executions. The government’s use of medication to cause involuntary death violates essential principles of medical ethics, and inevitably erodes public trust in the institution of medicine itself. Furthermore, it is at best ironic, and at worst inhumane, for the government to affirmatively seek death for some individuals while neglecting to aid thousands of others who are suffering as a result of the ongoing pandemic.

It is well recognized that the tools of medicine can be used to heal but also to hurt. As such, Hippocrates himself bound physicians by oath to use their faculties for the benefit of patients, and to avoid doing anything that is harmful or unjust. For the government to use the power of medicine to bring about involuntary death violates the very oath that the art and science of medicine be directed toward the benefit of humanity, and not humanity’s harm. This duty extends to all who utilize the science of medicine, whether by advising government officials as to the most effective agent, or by placing the intravenous catheter through which the medication is administered. The government itself is also bound by the same obligation as physicians when it comes to how it administers the tools of medicine. It must always be for benefit and never for harm.

Medications are essential elements of the sacred physician-patient relationship. Physicians are identified by their association with medications that are directed to the good of their patients. For the government to use tools of good in order to bring about the involuntary death of its citizens stands in stark contrast to the usual therapeutic expectations. As such, the public may no longer trust that the physician’s tools are solely for the benefit of the patient. If the government can legally kill one patient with medication, what is to keep it from laying claim to medications for harm in other ways, such as extrajudicial enhanced interrogation? It is easy to imagine how the sacred trust that protects the tools of the physician-patient relationship would be easily eroded.

A similar loss of trust occurs when patients see medication used for intentional harm. Medications, and by proxy those who develop and manufacture medications, should have as their purpose to benefit, and not to harm, patients. This accounts for the refusal of drug companies throughout the world to supply the United States with medications to be used for lethal injection. No pharmaceutical company wants the stigma of cooperating with the government by supplying a drug that will be used to kill its citizens involuntarily.

Although most physicians believe it is unethical to participate in capital punishment, some hold that doing so is a form of compassion. Citing previous botched executions where the inmate suffered unnecessarily, these physicians believe that their participation will make the inmate’s inevitable death less painful. This was the rationale of the surgeon Antoine Louis and physician Joseph Guillotin in creating a more humane method of execution in the 18th century. Even today, the device bears Dr. Guillotin’s name.

Despite protests from physicians that the government not use their tools to kill involuntarily, and the refusal of most physicians and drug manufacturers to participate in executions, the United States has decided to push forward. Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Baze v. Rees allowed lethal injection to proceed without physician supervision, physicians’ refusal to participate neither halts executions nor hastens the end of the practice of capital punishment in this country. Drug secrecy laws allow the source of medication for lethal injection to be withheld from the public. The means of medicine, entrusted to physicians who have sworn by oath to use them for benefit, have been usurped by the government and are being used for harm.

Not even a global pandemic, nor the pleas of families of victims and members of clergy, has slowed the march toward execution, despite concerns of contagion by those who must attend. It seems particularly perverse for government-sanctioned executions to occur while so many Americans are dying from COVID-19. The government’s actions are also forcing religious leaders to decide whether to risk contagion and attend the executions, or have these inmates die alone and without spiritual solace. We recoil when we hear similar stories about the manner in which COVID-19 patients are dying. Just as physicians—the people our society has entrusted to wield medicine—swear an oath to benefit and avoid harm, so should our government—which now also wields medicine—be held to the same standard.

Charles E. Binkley is a bioethicist and general surgeon.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Discrimination kills: What to do about implicit bias training

July 21, 2020 Kevin 3
…
Next

Obesity and the diet-microbiome connection: a conversation with a gastroenterologist [PODCAST]

July 21, 2020 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Discrimination kills: What to do about implicit bias training
Next Post >
Obesity and the diet-microbiome connection: a conversation with a gastroenterologist [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Charles E. Binkley, MD

  • The failure of the U.S. government’s physicians to do good, avoid harm, and tell the truth

    Charles E. Binkley, MD
  • It is unethical for the United States to send hydroxychloroquine to Brazil

    Charles E. Binkley, MD
  • Mike Pence and the Mayo Clinic’s moral failure

    Charles E. Binkley, MD

Related Posts

  • Why this physician marched during a pandemic

    Raj Sundar, MD
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for social media training in medical education 

    Oscar Chen, Sera Choi, and Clara Seong
  • Communication with insurers: a pandemic problem the vaccine won’t fix

    Anupama Balasubramanian
  • What makes people defy precautions during a pandemic?

    Ashten Duncan
  • Does federal law violate our right to health care?

    Matthew Dyer
  • Preparing for the next pandemic: Why a one-country approach is needed

    Kelli Todd, MPH and Amy Baruch, MD

More in Policy

  • How locum tenens work helps physicians and APPs reclaim control

    Brian Sutter
  • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

    Ilan Shapiro, MD
  • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws

    BJ Ferguson
  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ legislation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why being a physician mom is harder than anyone admits

      Cynthia Chen-Joea, DO, MPH | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ legislation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The man in seat 11A survived, but why don’t our patients?

      Dr. Vivek Podder | Physician
    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ legislation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why being a physician mom is harder than anyone admits

      Cynthia Chen-Joea, DO, MPH | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ legislation [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The man in seat 11A survived, but why don’t our patients?

      Dr. Vivek Podder | Physician
    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Unethical policy: Resuming federal lethal injections during a global pandemic
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...