Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Roe v. Wade: questions that need to be addressed in the near future

Tejas Sekhar
Policy
May 4, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

On May 2, 2022, news broke that Roe v. Wade would be overturned according to an initial draft majority opinion released by Politico. In the political economy that we find ourselves in, this news has had the immediate consequence of furthering divisions between Americans — those in favor of the ruling and those against. While much rhetoric about the morality of the underlying subject matter already exists given the intense debate this topic has garnered over the nearly half-century since the 1973 landmark decision, such a momentous decision is additionally impacted by “real-world” considerations and its pertinence to the health care industry.

A 2017 research study indicates that nearly 25 percent of American women are expected to get an abortion at some point during their lifetime. Additional studies indicate that nearly 630,000 abortions were documented in the United States in 2019. With such a high number of abortions occurring annually in the country each year, many argue that this statistic will likely be unchanged even after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. States that decide to restrict or ban abortions may see a fewer number of abortions, but other states where abortion is still accessible will compensate. This effect was seen in 2021 during the six-week implementation of the Texas Heartbeat Act, which banned abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity. Data from Planned Parenthood reported a nearly 800 percent increase in Texan abortion patients seeking care in surrounding states during the short-lived lifetime of the Heartbeat Act. While Texan abortion patients may have still been able to reliably access care in neighboring states, it would have likely been more costly for abortion patients to get their abortions outside of the state, prompting the consideration of both the financial cost to the patient involved and the available capacity of health care clinics and centers.

The social gradient of health contends that poorer and lower SES populations tend to have worse aggregate health and health outcomes. Following this social gradient of health, the reversal of Roe v. Wade would consequently affect marginalized communities the greatest, which compounds upon concomitant lower rates of contraceptive use. In states with restricted or banned abortions, at-risk individuals would likely incur additional immediate and latent expenses with out-of-state travel and time off of work. Additionally, those unable to pay increased costs now associated may be more vulnerable to engaging in practices that have reduced patient safety and worse patient outcomes. Existing data even indicates that banning abortion does not reduce the number of abortions occurring annually, but rather results in a greater number of unsafe abortions performed, contributing to an unfortunate increase in a preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality.

As seen with the Texas ruling, the consequence of certain states restricting or banning abortion may lead to increases in abortions-seeking patients receiving care in neighboring states. Given that there are 26 states that are reported to restrict or ban abortion in the case that Roe v. Wade is overturned, this would lead to redistribution of the nearly 630,000 abortions in just 29 remaining states — a less than half capacity. What might this mean for remaining practices, clinics, and centers that will continue to perform abortions? How might they need to adjust to adequately anticipate increases in abortion-seeking patients at their doorstep? And what would this mean for medical training for residents in states that have restricted or banned abortions, especially those going into allied fields that may require this knowledge and procedural understanding and competency? Should Roe v. Wade be overturned, we can expect these questions and more will need to be addressed in the near future.

Tejas Sekhar is a graduate student.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Protecting Black women's maternal health is urgent

May 4, 2022 Kevin 2
…
Next

Dislocations: an exception to the rule

May 4, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Protecting Black women's maternal health is urgent
Next Post >
Dislocations: an exception to the rule

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Tejas Sekhar

  • Inhaler nonadherence and social determinants of health

    Tejas Sekhar
  • Are we opening everything too quickly?

    Tejas Sekhar

Related Posts

  • Roe v. Wade: Share our experience and be part of the solution

    Segen E. Smith Chase, MD
  • Private equity in gastroenterology: Is it the future?

    Praveen Suthrum
  • This doctor will be running for the legislature in the future

    Anonymous
  • Reclaiming the future of health care

    Philip A. Masters, MD
  • For future physician-activists: This is our lane

    Jake Fox, Alec Feuerbach, and Jordan Rook
  • Women’s mental health in an America without Roe

    Susan Hatters Friedman, MD, Nina Ross, MD, Jacqueline Landess, MD, JD, and Aimee Kaempf, MD

More in Policy

  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • Do Jewish students face rising bias in holistic admissions?

      Anonymous | Education
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • ER threats aren’t rare anymore—they’re routine

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • JFK warned us about physical fitness. Sixty years later, we’re still not listening.

      Alexandre Bourcier, MD | Conditions
    • The silent threat in health care layoffs

      Todd Thorsen, MBA | Tech
    • Why true listening is crucial for future health care professionals [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Love on life support: a powerful reminder from the ICU

      Syed Ahmad Moosa, MD | Physician
    • Surviving kidney disease and reforming patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • My journey from misdiagnosis to living fully with APBD

      Jeff Cooper | Conditions
    • Do Jewish students face rising bias in holistic admissions?

      Anonymous | Education
    • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
  • Recent Posts

    • ER threats aren’t rare anymore—they’re routine

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • JFK warned us about physical fitness. Sixty years later, we’re still not listening.

      Alexandre Bourcier, MD | Conditions
    • The silent threat in health care layoffs

      Todd Thorsen, MBA | Tech
    • Why true listening is crucial for future health care professionals [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Love on life support: a powerful reminder from the ICU

      Syed Ahmad Moosa, MD | Physician
    • Surviving kidney disease and reforming patient care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...