Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

As cancer patients wait, states play favorites

Jaimie Cavanaugh, JD and Daryl James
Policy
July 5, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

Cancer patients soon will have new treatment options in Connecticut. Health care providers recently received regulatory approval for a joint venture that will allow them to open the state’s first proton therapy center.

The lifesaving technology, which uses laser beams as a safer and more effective alternative to chemotherapy, is urgently needed. So the announcement was a big deal. But what the partners failed to mention in their news release is that a competitor could beat them to market with a similar facility 45 miles away—except the state is running interference.

The rival project already has the necessary medical expertise, financing, zoning permits, and community support lined up. The only thing missing is a “certificate of need” (CON), a government permission slip to launch, expand or terminate any health care venture in the state.

The rival project, led by a group of independent doctors and investors, has tried to get a CON for two years. But the oversight agency with veto power recently issued a preliminary denial. Two weeks later, the same agency approved the joint venture.

The protectionism was not lost on the losing side, which has warned about higher health care costs due to a potential monopoly. An appeal is pending, but if the state sticks with its preliminary decision, Connecticut cancer patients will find themselves with less choice and less access to proton therapy.

The case shows a clear example of the government picking winners and losers. Two applicants submitted viable proposals. But rather than letting them compete on a level playing field—or coexist in separate cities—state regulators tipped the scales in favor of only one bid.

To make matters worse, Connecticut allowed the winning side to testify against its potential rival at a CON hearing, despite a clear conflict of interest. Something similar would happen if Connecticut allowed The Home Depot to participate in decisions about new hardware stores—or if the state allowed McDonald’s to say who could sell burgers.

Our public interest law firm, the Institute for Justice, has no connection to either proton therapy project, but supports the rights of all health care providers to invest their own money without unreasonable or excessive government interference.

Unfortunately, the Connecticut case is not unusual. “Conning the Competition,” a nationwide analysis of state laws from the Institute for Justice, identifies 38 states—plus Washington, D.C.—with some form of CON legislation. Overall, 34 of these jurisdictions allow competitors to intervene in the application process and object to applications that could reduce their revenue.

CON laws purport to lower health care costs, increase patient access and ensure quality by managing the distribution of private resources, but none of these gains has materialized. A joint report from two federal agencies—the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department—finds no evidence that CON laws achieve any public benefit.

A supermajority of studies agrees. More importantly, decades of real-world experience show that CON laws do not work as advertised. Recognizing the policy error, Congress reversed itself in 1986 and repealed CON mandates it had imposed just 12 years earlier.

Since then, California, Texas, and 10 other states, which contain nearly 40 percent of the U.S. population, have canceled their CON laws entirely. Most recently, New Hampshire joined the list in 2016. Each time, the American Hospital Association and local affiliates predicted disaster, but negative effects never materialized.

The opposite happened instead. At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, states without CON laws had more hospitals and surgery centers per capita, along with more hospital beds, dialysis clinics, and hospice care facilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

Recognizing its disadvantage, Connecticut scrambled to suspend CON requirements for mental health care facilities through June 2026 in response to a bed shortage. The legislation, which Gov. Ned Lamont signed on May 23, 2022, represents a step in the right direction. But additional psychiatric hospitals already could be open without CON constraints.

Proton therapy also could be available today if providers did not have to spend years begging for permission to serve patients. Lifesaving technology should not have to wait. Rather than playing favorites, states should repeal their CON laws and let doctors work.

Jaimie Cavanaugh is an attorney. Daryl James is a writer.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

The forgotten crisis: a shortage of geriatric doctors in the U.S.

July 4, 2022 Kevin 2
…
Next

A hospice doctor's advice on getting your finances in order

July 5, 2022 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The forgotten crisis: a shortage of geriatric doctors in the U.S.
Next Post >
A hospice doctor's advice on getting your finances in order

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Jaimie Cavanaugh, JD and Daryl James

  • The impact of certificate of need laws on rural health care

    Jaimie Cavanaugh, JD and Daryl James
  • Patients lose when states block independent doctors

    Jaimie Cavanaugh, JD and Daryl James

Related Posts

  • Cancer patients who want to take unproven supplements

    Marc Braunstein, MD, PhD
  • Obstruction of medical justice: How health care fails patients with cancer

    Miriam A. Knoll, MD
  • Are patients using social media to attack physicians?

    David R. Stukus, MD
  • You are abandoning your patients if you are not active on social media

    Pat Rich
  • We must help patients recognize how important their opinions are

    Karen Sepucha, PhD
  • Physicians who don’t play the social media game may be left behind

    Xrayvsn, MD

More in Policy

  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Third-party litigation funding threatens access to health care

    The Doctors Company
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden impact of denials on health care systems

      Diana Ortiz, JD | Finance
    • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Why it’s time for doctors to become performance coaches

      Michael Day, MD | Physician
    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When asking one more question can change everything

      Zain Abidin | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How to build a culture where physicians feel valued [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • In the absence of physician mentorship, who will train the next generation of primary care clinicians?

      Kenneth Botelho, DMSc, PA-C | Education
    • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

      Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD | Physician
    • What independent and locum tenens doctors need to know about fair market value

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Physician
    • Health care’s data problem: the real obstacle to AI success

      Jay Anders, MD | Tech
    • What ChatGPT’s tone reveals about our cultural values

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden impact of denials on health care systems

      Diana Ortiz, JD | Finance
    • Why no medical malpractice firm responded to my scientific protocol

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • A world without antidepressants: What could possibly go wrong?

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Meds
    • Why it’s time for doctors to become performance coaches

      Michael Day, MD | Physician
    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When asking one more question can change everything

      Zain Abidin | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • The silent crisis hurting pain patients and their doctors

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How to build a culture where physicians feel valued [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How the CDC’s opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients

      Charles LeBaron, MD | Conditions
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating physician non-competes: a strategy for staying put [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • In the absence of physician mentorship, who will train the next generation of primary care clinicians?

      Kenneth Botelho, DMSc, PA-C | Education
    • Fear of other people’s opinions nearly killed me. Here’s what freed me.

      Jillian Rigert, MD, DMD | Physician
    • What independent and locum tenens doctors need to know about fair market value

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Physician
    • Health care’s data problem: the real obstacle to AI success

      Jay Anders, MD | Tech
    • What ChatGPT’s tone reveals about our cultural values

      Jenny Shields, PhD | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

As cancer patients wait, states play favorites
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...