Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Binary medicine harms our gender-expansive patients

Alexandra Beem
Policy
April 24, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

The first time I saw a preceptor use the American College of Cardiology’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (mercifully, ASCVD) risk calculator, I was hooked. As a first-year medical student, data nerd, and aspiring primary care provider, I love a good diagnostic tool. Watching as he entered our patient’s pertinent medical history, I ran down the list of risk factors for cardiovascular disease we’d just learned in my head: age, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking history, sex —

“Hang on,” I asked, looking at the options for sex: male or female. “What do you enter when your patient identifies as transgender?”

I learned to ask this question working as a clinical research coordinator on a study documenting how stress and stigma impact the health of Black and Latina transgender women living with HIV. Participants explained again and again how our medical system’s binary assumptions about sex and gender harmed their health, their relationships with providers, and their trust in a system that was clearly not designed with gender-expansive people in mind.

“Gender-expansive” is a term that encompasses people whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth, including those who identify as transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming. Recent estimates suggest that 1.6% of the US adult population — 5.3 million people — identify as gender-expansive. That number climbs to 5.1% among those aged 18-29 as younger generations feel increasingly safe to share their gender identity. 

Providers need to recognize that LGBTQ+, and specifically gender-expansive, individuals make up a growing share of our practice. Unfortunately, medical education and screening tools are lagging behind.

Take the ASCVD calculator, for instance. A recent study evaluated the calculator’s predictions for the cohort of transgender women I worked with last year—first calculating each individual’s risk score using their sex assigned at birth (male,) then using their gender (female,) and lastly their current hormone therapy regimen. The results are striking: when all patients were coded as male, the calculator recommended 35% of them be prescribed statins, versus only 18% when all were coded as female – and still just 22% when coded according to their current hormone therapy regimen.

If your patient fell into that gap, would you prescribe the statin?

Currently, the ASCVD calculator’s estimate of a patient’s 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event relies on five landmark cardiovascular health studies, each of which reported only participants’ sex, not their gender identity, gender expression, or hormone use. Similarly, the calculator’s therapeutic recommendations for cholesterol treatment are based on a systematic review of ten randomized controlled trials that only report sex.

When applying these systems to gender-expansive patients, guessing wrong could mean prescribing unnecessary statins to 17% of our study participants—exposing them to an increased risk for diabetes, hemorrhagic stroke, and muscle pain. On the other hand, providers could end up denying potentially life-saving statins to up to half of the people indicated.

Put simply, the ASCVD calculator is built on binary data, so it only works for people who meet binary assumptions about sex and gender. In a world where sex and gender exist on a spectrum, this fundamental flaw represents a systemic failure in medicine that is harming millions of patients.

Underreporting gender identity and sexual orientation is not unique to cardiology; of the 32,500 articles published in top dermatology journals over the past decade, just 0.02% included and discussed these issues. Federal data are also lagging; only 36 states ask their residents the CDC’s standardized sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) questions. This is despite evidence that people are comfortable answering questions about their sex and gender—in fact, preferring it to discussing their income.

Our patients deserve evidence-based care, and we desperately need better data in order to provide it. Recognizing this, the Biden administration has issued the first-ever Federal Evidence Agenda on LGBTQ+ Equity, calling for increased federal SOGI data collection. As researchers and practitioners, it is imperative that we follow suit.

This mission is long overdue, and medicine-wide tasks like updating decision-making tools like the ASCVD calculator– and their underlying bodies of data– require more than day-to-day conversations. However, providers can start small and still make a world of difference. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Providers report feeling uncomfortable asking patients about gender identity, citing lack of training and nowhere to document their findings in electronic health records. In response, the CDC worked with a LGBTQ+-focused clinic in Boston to develop a comprehensive guide to SOGI data collection in clinic. Resources like this give providers an opportunity to educate themselves on the fundamental medicine, terminology, and documentation needed until we can better incorporate LGBTQ+ health into medical school curricula. Beyond the exam room, clinical research studies must incorporate validated SOGI data collection measures, both for the sake of their own results and for the meta-analysis that follows.

Gender-expansive patients deserve better care than our current medical system and diagnostic tools can provide. As providers, researchers, and advocates for the LGBTQ+ community, it is our responsibility to challenge our assumptions about gender identity and our system to do better– only then can we truly do no harm.

Alexandra Beem is a medical student.

Prev

A better future in migraine management: the essential role of primary care

April 24, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

How lack of access to clean water is devastating developing countries

April 24, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Cardiology, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A better future in migraine management: the essential role of primary care
Next Post >
How lack of access to clean water is devastating developing countries

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Close the gender pay gap in medicine

    Linda Girgis, MD
  • Challenging gender bias in the house of medicine

    Barbara McAneny, MD
  • When Western medicine fails patients and clinicians

    Kimberly Rogers, MD
  • How Big Medicine is hurting patients and putting small practices out of business

    John Machata, MD
  • A surprising example of how medicine is learned from our patients

    Aaron Grubner, MD
  • How social media can advance humanism in medicine

    Pooja Lakshmin, MD

More in Policy

  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • How fragmented records and poor tracking degrade patient outcomes

    Michael R. McGuire
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 9 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Binary medicine harms our gender-expansive patients
9 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...