Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Hospitals should recognize and address administrative harm

Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, MPH
Policy
October 16, 2024
Share
Tweet
Share

“Administrative harm is destroying American medicine” is the title of a provocative article published in the July 13, 2024, issue of KevinMD by Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA. He references business entrepreneur and billionaire Michael B. Kim, who said: “Leadership without ethics is a body without a soul.” As examples of administrative harms, Dr. Lazarus cites “unrealistic staffing models, burdensome regulations, out-of-touch administrators, lack of frank feedback to leaders, and unhelpful consultants.” He states that such harm is “manifest in excessive paperwork, rigid protocols that do not allow for individualized patient care, and resource limitations that prevent timely and adequate treatment.”

On June 24, 2024, “Identifying and measuring administrative harms experienced by hospitalists and administrative leaders” was published online by JAMA Internal Medicine. The 13 co-authors from seven states indicate administrative harm is important because “the adverse consequences of administrative decisions within health care that impact work structure, processes, and programs are pervasive in medicine, yet poorly understood and described.” They assert these consequences “influence patient care and outcomes, professional practice, and organizational efficiencies regardless of employment setting.”

The article includes specific comments from 32 individuals responding to a 12-question survey. Representative responses were:

1. “Months into the pandemic, we had gotten very good at all the things to do to deal with surges. Someone in the risk management department at the health system said they wait a minute; we do not have evidence that the physicians and APPs have completed the required training as they do for hand hygiene and sharps, injury prevention, etc. And so, there was an urgent email that went out basically saying you have 72 hours to complete this one-hour-and-15-minute training on COVID safety or your credentials will be suspended.”

2. “We had a new CEO come in, and we already have a strained emergency room, but he really wanted to ramp up accepting transfers into the hospital, which just further burdened us, and everybody wants to please the new CEO. So now we have a pipeline of people coming from states away to just sit in our emergency room in the hall ….”

3. “We couldn’t get echos on the weekend … and the way that administration solved that problem was if someone really needed an echo, there is always a cardiology fellow who can just come in and work extra hours for free and do that. I’ve seen many examples where inadequate staffing is tolerated by administration because we know that thing needs to be done, and we will get it done somehow and you can always get an underpaid trainee to do the work. Administration really has no particular reason to change that if patients are still getting the care they need.”

4. “It was a business decision made by business folks without any clinical input … Where does that come from? It’s folks not understanding, not being at the bedside, not engaging frontline workers, not having a clinical background, and not reaching out to understand, ‘If I made this decision, yes, it fixes my budget, but what ramifications does it cause downstream?’ That’s where I think a lot of these decisions happen—because people are making them in a silo.”

Numerous studies have suggested burnout and moral distress among health care professionals seem ubiquitous, resulting in more absenteeism, increased turnover, people working part-time, and earlier retirement. The research reported in the JAMA Internal Medicine article is somewhat unique because administrative harm represents a new label for the assortment of factors negatively affecting staff, patients, and organizations.

The authors determined that such harm affected writing clinical orders, scheduling personnel, discharging patients, and providing resources. The perception of administrative harm ranged “from an inevitable byproduct of decisions (an acceptable status quo) to recognizing it as a symptom of a dysfunctional management system that can be rectified (reversible or avoidable harm).”

Among the concerns highlighted were the difficulty of measuring administrative harm, a lack of an avenue to report harm, a fear of possible retribution, ineffective collaboration between administrators and clinicians, and an absence of leadership responsibility and accountability.

Coincidentally, on July 31, 2024, STAT News reported a remarkable example of administrative harm. The article’s title was “Mount Sinai mounted aggressive campaign to stifle debate over revelations about its controversial brain research.” The article’s author, Katherine Eban, stated, “Mount Sinai, a leading hospital network in New York City, has mounted an extraordinary behind-the-scenes campaign to blunt the fallout over revelations about its controversial research project in which brain biopsies are taken from patients undergoing deep brain stimulation.” She wrote that an FDA review “concluded that Mount Sinai researchers were misleading patients and using a false justification to obtain the biopsies.” Not surprisingly, Ms. Eban noted several medical ethicists agreed the consent process was unethical.

The need for an effective action plan to prevent administrative harm

Although the term administrative harm is unfamiliar to most health care executives, the justification for evaluating what practical steps can be taken to minimize such harm is undeniable. The following steps are worth deliberation:

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Discuss the concept of administrative harm with the institution’s governing body and in a senior leadership meeting.
  • Encourage members to offer illustrations of administrative harm.
  • Explore possible options for preventing such harm.
  • Determine how incidents of administrative harm can be identified.
  • Consider how medical staff members can be engaged in examining this topic.
  • Develop an educational program for supervisors and clinicians.

Both employees and physicians must be comfortable in reporting perceived incidents of administrative harm to leaders without fear of retribution. In some cases, it could be appropriate to formally recognize those who report administrative harm to incentivize others to do so. Of course, essential to this process is an organizational culture that promotes collaborative relationships and trust among staff.

Paul B. Hofmann is a health care consultant.

Prev

Understanding and supporting loved ones with celiac disease: a guide from 2 gastroenterologists

October 16, 2024 Kevin 0
…
Next

Why collaboration is the key to solving health care burnout [PODCAST]

October 16, 2024 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Practice Management

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Understanding and supporting loved ones with celiac disease: a guide from 2 gastroenterologists
Next Post >
Why collaboration is the key to solving health care burnout [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, MPH

  • The true value and power of respect is too often undervalued

    Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, MPH
  • Jimmy Carter’s end-of-life decision: Respecting patient autonomy and the importance of hospice care

    Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, MPH
  • Would a Hippocratic Oath for health care executives make a difference?

    Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, MPH

Related Posts

  • We must disrupt harm

    Julie Craig, MD
  • Making America great again with harm reduction

    Mark Leeds, DO
  • To address youth mental health, we must address insurance barriers

    Alex Stavros, MBA
  • Drug prices and fast approvals can harm patients

    Martha Rosenberg
  • Physician well-being: Overcoming administrative hurdles

    Pat Rich
  • How hospitals’ requirements lead to staffing shortages

    Tiffany R. Archambault

More in Policy

  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Innovation is moving too fast for health care workers to catch up

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How pediatricians can address the health problems raised in the MAHA child health report

    Joseph Barrocas, MD
  • How reforming insurance, drug prices, and prevention can cut health care costs

    Patrick M. O'Shaughnessy, DO, MBA
  • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

    AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section
  • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

    Joshua Vasquez, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • How federal actions threaten vaccine policy and trust

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • When the clinic becomes the battlefield: Defending rural health care in the age of AI-driven attacks

      Holland Haynie, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The shocking risk every smart student faces when applying to medical school

      Curtis G. Graham, MD | Physician
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
  • Recent Posts

    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • Why “the best physicians” risk burnout and isolation

      Scott Abramson, MD | Physician
    • Why the Sean Combs trial is a wake-up call for HIV prevention

      Catherine Diamond, MD | Conditions
    • Why real medicine is more than quick labels

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • New surge in misleading ads about diabetes on social media poses a serious health risk

      Laura Syron | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • How federal actions threaten vaccine policy and trust

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • When the clinic becomes the battlefield: Defending rural health care in the age of AI-driven attacks

      Holland Haynie, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The shocking risk every smart student faces when applying to medical school

      Curtis G. Graham, MD | Physician
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
  • Recent Posts

    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • Why “the best physicians” risk burnout and isolation

      Scott Abramson, MD | Physician
    • Why the Sean Combs trial is a wake-up call for HIV prevention

      Catherine Diamond, MD | Conditions
    • Why real medicine is more than quick labels

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • New surge in misleading ads about diabetes on social media poses a serious health risk

      Laura Syron | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...