As physicians, regardless of our specialty, we share a singular, defining orientation: a fiduciary commitment to the patient sitting in front of us. Whether we are operating on a heart, managing complex diabetes, or counseling a family through a life-altering diagnosis, our patients grant us extraordinary latitude. They do so based on a deeply held understanding that our clinical judgment will be exercised solely in their best interests. This sacred trust is the foundation of the medical profession.
Yet, across all disciplines of medicine, that bedrock feels increasingly unsteady.
We are practicing in an era of rapid, unprecedented health care consolidation. Hospitals increasingly operate as massive corporate enterprises, and productivity, often measured strictly in relative value units (RVUs), governs the cadence of our daily lives. As a cardiothoracic surgeon, I feel this compression of time and risk acutely in the operating room. But I know my colleagues in primary care, emergency medicine, oncology, and hospital medicine feel these exact same pressures just as deeply in their clinics and wards.
The resulting moral distress and burnout are threatening the sustainability of our entire health care workforce. However, as we look for solutions to this crisis, we must move past the well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed idea that burnout can simply be “wellnessed away” with resilience seminars, meditation apps, and yoga modules. Physicians are already among the most resilient professionals in society; our distress is not a failure of individual grit. It is a predictable symptom of flawed system design.
Real physician voices, twice a week
Free, and one click to unsubscribe.
If we want to heal our profession, we need to redefine leadership as a collaborative effort to redesign our systems from the ground up. When we actively align our clinical realities with the operational goals of our hospitals, we create a profound “win-win” that benefits hospital stability, physician well-being, and, above all, patient care. Here is what that collaborative system design looks like in practice.
Curing administrative harm together
Every physician knows the acute pain of “administrative harm.” This is the tangible patient risk created by bureaucratic processes that delay, distort, or fragment medical care. When previous authorizations, peer-to-peer reviews, or rigid documentation burdens delay a necessary MRI, a critical biologic medication, or a life-saving surgery, the patient suffers physically and emotionally. Simultaneously, the physician experiences intense moral distress, the crushing feeling of knowing exactly what the patient needs but being structurally prevented from delivering it.
It is easy to view health care administrators as the adversaries in this dynamic, but the reality is that administrators do not want bottlenecks any more than we do. They are often just as constrained by external payer requirements and inefficient legacy software.
True collaborative leadership involves bringing clinical and administrative leaders to the same table to track these administrative harms as rigorously as we track clinical complications like infection rates or 30-day readmissions. By working together to measure metrics such as “time-to-authorization” or “time-to-surgery,” we can proactively streamline workflows. Removing this friction is the ultimate win-win: It increases the hospital’s operational efficiency and throughput, while giving physicians back the time they desperately need to spend at the bedside.
Making psychological safety a core organizational metric
In high-stakes environments, whether a chaotic emergency department, a busy outpatient clinic, or an operating room, psychological safety must be operational, not aspirational. Psychological safety is the lived ability of any team member (a nurse, a first-year trainee, or a seasoned attending) to speak up and say, “We need to pause,” or “I see a risk here,” without the fear of reprisal, humiliation, or career damage.
The data on this is unequivocal: Teams with high psychological safety report concerns earlier, catch medical errors before they ever reach the patient, and engage in more robust, creative clinical deliberation. Building this environment requires cultivating a “just culture,” one that distinguishes honest human error from reckless, at-risk behavior. It allows hospital systems to learn and evolve without defaulting to reflexive blame.
When hospital leadership actively embraces and measures psychological safety, the financial and clinical returns are immense. Nursing and physician turnover drops significantly, saving the institution millions in recruitment costs. Team cohesion skyrockets, and patient outcomes reliably improve. In modern health care, a strong, psychologically safe culture is quite literally good business.
Reimagining how we measure professional value
Currently, RVU-based compensation models subtly but powerfully privilege procedural throughput over thoughtful deliberation. If we only measure and reward volume, we unintentionally erode the art of medicine. Pure productivity metrics inherently undervalue time-intensive patient conversations, complex shared decision-making, preventative care, and the vital mentorship of the next generation of doctors.
Forward-thinking health care organizations are realizing that this volume-only approach is entirely unsustainable for long-term program health. The new, strategic win-win is adopting compensation and evaluation frameworks that look beyond the RVU. We must incorporate quality outcomes, safety behaviors, teamwork, and protected, compensated time for teaching and administrative leadership.
When hospital leadership visibly rewards physicians for stewardship, continuity of care, and program building, it changes the entire calculus of medical practice. It cultivates a deeply loyal, highly engaged workforce and builds a legacy of institutional excellence that outlasts any single financial quarter.
A shared path forward
We are entering an era that will judge us not only by our clinical outcomes and survival curves but by whether the systems we build remain worthy of our patients’ trust. Reclaiming our professional joy does not mean fighting the system, nor does it mean quietly resigning ourselves to the status quo. It means stepping up to lead the system. By partnering across the clinical-administrative aisle to reduce friction, build psychological safety, and reward true holistic value, we can transform our hospitals. Together, we can create environments where physicians are proud to practice, where hospitals thrive operationally, and where our patients are safe to heal.
This essay is cited in the KevinMD records on physician burnout and physicians and administrators.
Jeffrey Shuhaiber is a cardiovascular surgeon.
