The inconsistent academic peer review process
I check the submission website again. And again. Sometimes in the middle of the night, I find myself refreshing the page, hoping for a small update (a new status, a change in wording, a sign that my manuscript has moved from “under review” to “decision in process”).
For early-career researchers, this waiting game is familiar. We pour months, sometimes years, of effort into designing a study, collecting data, writing, revising, and …










![How should kratom be regulated? [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/Design-2-190x100.jpg)