And the plaintiff lawyer isn’t happy:
“A majority of the jurors saw this as a $5- to $7-million case, and I very much agreed with them,” Faison said. “But there was one juror who was out of step and out of touch.”
A single juror brings down a malpractice award
ADVERTISEMENT
Related Posts
More in Uncategorized
Past Week
-
The conflict of interest that discloses as nothing
-
How to reassure patients: 5 steps beyond normal tests
-
Why patients stop trusting doctors who listened to them [PODCAST]
-
AI in prior authorization: 3 contract questions for 2027
-
How to build a dementia care pathway, not a referral sheet
-
Underage online gambling needs more than a checkbox
-
Past 6 Months
-
Why CDC opioid guidelines get the overdose data wrong
-
Retirement isn’t the end of medicine, it’s a second act [PODCAST]
-
Sensory processing in autism and the brain’s volume control
-
What maternity care deserts cost a town
-
Why medicine needs a national physician license now
-
A cold cost $945. The cost of primary care is broken.
-
Recent Posts
-
Why patients stop trusting doctors who listened to them [PODCAST]
-
Blood sugar and brain aging start long before diabetes
-
What did the tirzepatide study actually test?
-
Why is psychic pain treated as a symptom instead of pain?
-
Diagnostic overshadowing and the war in her throat
-
Why do charity commercials leave clinicians uneasy?
-
Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!
Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.
