Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Physicians and patients are now pawns in a political game

Nicole M. King, MD
Policy
July 11, 2022
Share
Tweet
Share

This morning I had a migraine. I should have known it was coming. I now have complex migraines and was having word-finding difficulty yesterday, which is a harbinger for me. How could I have known that my soul had known before my mind had, that it had known we were about to rip away a standing protection for half of the U.S. population and dress it up as a state’s right 24 hours after taking the right of states to control concealed weapons away because it violated federal law. The circular argument was enough to explain my migraine and my suffocating sense of doom.

As I moved through the wave of emotions that so many of us have today, I kept landing on one unrelenting concept: control. Knowing that this was in no way about life. It was about a fundamental right being pulled away so that other rights allowing anyone other than cis heterosexual white men to succeed could be dismantled. Control. Power. Privilege.

This brought me to the recognition that those of us in medicine have willingly complied with much of this destruction. Giving money and support to organizations that have been silent in the face of ongoing attempts to take our rights away as sovereign individuals. Knowing that to do our job and maintain our credentials, we all but had to “support” or “give” a fee to these organizations despite not agreeing with their politics or their positions as it related to socioeconomic concerns.

Though I am just as guilty as the next person, my thoughts wandered to those who felt medicine was their calling despite their staunch pro-life opinions and morals. I wondered how many of them understood what happens to a woman’s body while pregnant if she has known peripartum cardiomyopathy or unknown severe pulmonary hypertension. Do they know how to take care of that patient? Do they understand how to prevent killing her and her fetus if she was to be in distress? Would they be willing to induce labor to save the mother’s life even if the fetus was not viable? Would they risk that decision now that it is potentially illegal? Or would they willingly sacrifice likely the mother and the child for their self-righteous and now legally binding commitment to being “pro-life?”

I’ve always recoiled and almost smirked when physicians deny the need to be “political” in our job. Nothing about our job is free of legal jargon and legal ramifications. Everything we do is political. We are constrained within our occupation by our license, credentials, and the state in which we live. If there is a law regarding our job, then it, by virtue of touching the judicial system, is political. Politics dictate our civic duty as physicians. These are facts. This means if you are a “pro-life” physician in a red state, you now have the right to figure out how to save a woman’s life when she needs to be rescued from the state you allowed her to be forced into through your pious privileged position.

Never mind how this slope slips ever closer to full control of a person’s body while pregnant. What happens if you “work too much” and go into premature labor? What if you drink too much caffeine or something that is “bad” during pregnancy and you have a miscarriage? Will there be an investigation? Will we be relegated back to a time when being pregnant meant we could no longer hold jobs or work out or do what we wanted as human beings who are the ones growing the fetus inside our bodies? Who gets to decide that? What about all the physicians who are women of childbearing age? Will they be prosecuted for pregnancy complications because they “choose” to have a demanding career?

What we have left at the end of all of these questions is the one glaring concept, control. If a woman cannot procreate on her terms and is potentially questioned or maligned for things that may happen while pregnant, then women have to consider more closely if and when they get pregnant. This means they are forced to choose between work and potential pregnancy. This means we have forfeited control of our lives over to those who are not capable of becoming pregnant. And are dependent on our employer or partner’s permission on how and when we procreate. As if we are owned. As if we are property. As if the uterus we contain is both an assault on our freedom and a ticket to control us by those already in power. Physicians and patients are now pawns in a game so many were willing to play.

Those physicians, specifically women physicians, who thought this was only about a choice were dead wrong. They, too, are now controlled just as much as the next person with a uterus. And their education and privilege will not protect them from the demise of their career or their lives.

Nicole M. King is an anesthesiologist and intensivist.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

An example of medical-legal consulting [PODCAST]

July 10, 2022 Kevin 0
…
Next

Roe v. Wade: Share our experience and be part of the solution

July 11, 2022 Kevin 4
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
An example of medical-legal consulting [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Roe v. Wade: Share our experience and be part of the solution

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Nicole M. King, MD

  • How medicine is evolving: Bridging generational divides in the profession

    Nicole M. King, MD
  • Navigating COVID: a journey from academic intensity to healing

    Nicole M. King, MD
  • Chiefs fan to gun violence advocate: How football and tragedy reshaped my mission

    Nicole M. King, MD

Related Posts

  • Are patients using social media to attack physicians?

    David R. Stukus, MD
  • Physicians who don’t play the social media game may be left behind

    Xrayvsn, MD
  • The complex expectations of patients toward their physicians

    Michael L. Millenson
  • We need physicians who advocate for patients’ best interests

    Daniel Low, MD
  • Physicians and patients must work together to improve health care

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • The risk physicians take when going on social media

    Anonymous

More in Policy

  • How locum tenens work helps physicians and APPs reclaim control

    Brian Sutter
  • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

    Ilan Shapiro, MD
  • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws

    BJ Ferguson
  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How the shingles vaccine could help prevent dementia

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How to survive a broken health care system without losing yourself [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
    • When the diagnosis is personal: What my mother’s Alzheimer’s taught me about healing

      Pearl Jones, MD | Conditions
    • 2 hours to decide my future: How the SOAP residency match traps future doctors

      Nicolette V. S. Sewall, MD, MPH | Education
    • Key strategies for smooth EHR transitions in health care

      Sandra Johnson | Tech
    • Reassessing the impact of CDC’s opioid guidelines on chronic pain care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why removing fluoride from water is a public health disaster

      Steven J. Katz, DDS | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why we fear being forgotten more than death itself

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Bureaucracy over care: How the U.S. health care system lost its way

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How the shingles vaccine could help prevent dementia

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How to survive a broken health care system without losing yourself [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Physicians and patients are now pawns in a political game
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...