Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The vaccination dilemma: Protecting patient rights or caregiver freedom?

M. Bennet Broner, PhD
Conditions
March 10, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

Recently, I heard a news report regarding several state attorneys general suing the federal government to eliminate the requirement that health care providers be immunized against COVID. They argued that as fully immunized individuals still contract COVID, and that allowing unimmunized people to be rehired would relieve provider shortage, the regulation was unhelpful.

Initially, I agreed, as rehiring these individuals would generate some relief for those staff members who have worked overtime for many months; and would help reduce burnout, depression, resignations, and suicide. All laudable goals.

Subsequently, several questions came to mind: If I was hospitalized for a non-COVID condition, would I want to be cared for by an unimmunized nurse; would the hospital have a fiduciary duty to inform me of the caregiver’s vaccination status and allow me to request an immunized caregiver; if I contracted COVID from an unimmunized employee and required intensive care or died, could the hospital be liable; and does the employee’s right to non-immunization supersede my right to a safe hospital environment? And from these thoughts, I concluded that re-employing the unimmunized would be a questionable practice.

As an adolescent, my favorite author was Robert Heinlein. Most of his writings were from the 1930s to 1950s, and he was a product of his times, being both a racist and a misogynist and favoring white European men. He was also a strong individualist, and his concept of an ideal society was one in which government was as minimal as possible, that protected the weak and ill, and in which everyone had a responsibility to, including sacrificing their lives, to maintain and protect this government.

Major colonization of North America began with those who wished to be free of royal caprice and religious persecution. After the Revolutionary War, the Articles of Confederation attempted to balance individual autonomy and government control by creating a weak central authority but strong state governments, with the belief that by giving more power to the latter, individuals would be accorded the greatest liberty.

This approach to administration was not new but was borrowed from the Greeks, who formed a cooperative of independent city-states over two millennia earlier with much the same goal. The Greek system proved unworkable and collapsed. The states were more prescient and convened a committee to develop a more functional form of governing.

The Constitutional Convention sought to strengthen the federal government while maintaining maximal rights for states and individuals. The meetings were exceedingly contentious and resulted in a document constructed of compromises that were most likely to be ratified by sufficient states to become the country’s foundation.

If one examines national history, there have been necessary but temporary instances when individual rights have been limited. Still, these rights have been expanded overall, though shrinkage of individual rights has occurred over the last 10 to 15 years. In part, this has resulted in the Supreme Court awarding a select group of people rights exceeding those supported by the Constitution while eliminating rights provided to others provided by the document. The Court and the individuals who had their rights expanded perceive a society different from that which presently exists: a society that supports them but does not require them to have corresponding social responsibilities, and in doing so, they are molding the nation into an oligarchy, rather than maintaining a republic.

People who fulfill specialized roles in society often, and by choice, forgo specific individual rights: a concept Mr. Heinlein heartily supported. Ministers cannot endorse specific candidates from the pulpit or as representatives of a specific church; those who enter the military cannot selectively obey orders; most children, unless specific criteria are met by their parents, must be inoculated against specific contagious diseases to enter public school (recent minor relaxation of these regulations have been causative of recent outbreaks of measles and polio amongst uninoculated children); and those who work in health care cannot decline most infectious disease precautions (i.e., washing hands or sterilizing reusable instruments); a point recently reinforced by NIH, when they reemphasized in-patient safety.

Multiple analyses of today’s vaccine refusers differentiate them from vaccine acceptors in that refusers: have a greater level of generalized suspicion/mistrust, interpret the actions of others more negatively, are more likely to accept information from biased sources, are resistant/fearful of change, are more likely to use emotion in decision making, and have a low opinion of science and scientists; and these factors are not related to intelligence, financial station, or level of education.

It would be reasonable to assume that individuals who enter patient-care professions wish, on some level, to help those who are ailing. If so, why would uninoculated professionals want to care for patients they could possibly infect with COVID, adding to their disease burden and possibly killing them (aside from not believing that COVID vaccination works)? Does their right to be unvaccinated confer a right to potentially spread contagion? We are left with a conundrum, as individuals desiring to protect their own rights propose a government that reduces the individual rights of others.

Of course, a remedy to protect non-COVID patients and employ non-inoculated caregivers would be to limit these caregivers to working with COVID patients. In this manner, these professionals would only risk exposing themselves (and their families), but not their patients, to infection.

M. Bennet Broner is a medical ethicist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

Empowering physicians to lead: the benefits of physician leadership [PODCAST]

March 9, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

Breaking the cycle of addiction treatment scams: a physician's guide

March 10, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: COVID, Infectious Disease

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Empowering physicians to lead: the benefits of physician leadership [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Breaking the cycle of addiction treatment scams: a physician's guide

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by M. Bennet Broner, PhD

  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • Why shared decision-making in medicine often fails

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • How corporate greed and politics are destroying health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD

Related Posts

  • The caregiver’s mantra: doing the best I can

    Patricia Williams
  • A universal patient medical record

    Michael R. McGuire
  • A patient waits. And waits.

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Treating the patient’s body is not synonymous with treating the patient

    Steven Zhang, MD
  • Physicians are trapped between patient satisfaction and unnecessary prescribing

    Richard Young, MD
  • Every patient has a story

    Michele Luckenbaugh

More in Conditions

  • Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

    American College of Physicians
  • Hope is the lifeline: a deeper look into transplant care

    Judith Eguzoikpe, MD, MPH
  • From hospital bed to harsh truths: a writer’s unexpected journey

    Raymond Abbott
  • Bird flu’s deadly return: Are we flying blind into the next pandemic?

    Tista S. Ghosh, MD, MPH
  • “The medical board doesn’t know I exist. That’s the point.”

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • When moisturizers trigger airport bomb alarms

    Eva M. Shelton, MD and Janmesh Patel
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • How conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why young doctors in South Korea feel broken before they even begin

      Anonymous | Education
    • Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden chains holding doctors back

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • Why does rifaximin cost 95 percent more in the U.S. than in Asia?

      Jai Kumar, MD, Brian Nohomovich, DO, PhD and Leonid Shamban, DO | Meds
    • How conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why young doctors in South Korea feel broken before they even begin

      Anonymous | Education
    • Measles is back: Why vaccination is more vital than ever

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • Physician job change: Navigating your 457 plan and avoiding tax traps [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden chains holding doctors back

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The vaccination dilemma: Protecting patient rights or caregiver freedom?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...