Deductive reasoning in medical malpractice: a quantitative approach
Conventionally, medical malpractice is argued using inductive reasoning. There is nothing wrong with inductive reasoning. It is a component of critical thinking. However, it is just a component. Inductive reasoning is more subjective than objective and the influences of selection bias, avoidance bias, and confirmation bias are undetectable.
Deductive reasoning is also a component of critical thinking. It is not immune from these same biases; however, deductive reasoning is more robust …
Deductive reasoning in medical malpractice: a quantitative approach











![Politics and fear have replaced science in U.S. pain management [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/11c2db8f-2b20-4a4d-81cc-083ae0f47d6e-190x100.jpeg)






